• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제32권12호
• /
• pp.1127-1130
• /
• 1999

Percutaneous coronary intervention including intracoronary stenting is currently an accepted treatment modality in the treatment of coronary artery disease and is widely performed to treat the patient with multivessel disease with decreased morbidities and less cost compared with conventional coronary rtery bypass grafting(CABG), Repeated interventions due to restenosis even after successful angioplasty are the major disadvantage of the angioplsty especially when the lesion is located inthe left anterior descending artery(LAD) Recently CABG through left anterior small thoracotomy using the left internal thoracic artery to revascularize the LAD territory without cardiopulmonary bypass so called Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass(MIDCAB) was intrduced and performed with comparable early outcomes. In this regard the integrated approach with percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery so called 'Hybrid CABG' was suggested to be an effective treatment in suitable patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. We report three cases of Hybrid CABG.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제39권5호
• /
• pp.399-402
• /
• 2006

스텐트 혈전증은 경피적 관상동맥 중재술의 드문 합병증으로 치명적인 결과를 일으킬 수 있다. 저자들은 스텐트 혈전에 의한 심인성 쇼크와 심실성 빈맥이 동반된 급성 심근경색 환자 1예를 경피적 심폐 순환 보조 요법으로 성공적으로 치료하였기에 보고하고자 한다.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제25권11호
• /
• pp.1273-1277
• /
• 1992

Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty[PTA] was introduced by Dotter and JudKins [1964], using coaxial catheters of increasing diameter. The remarkable advances in vascular catheter technology over the past several decades have permitted the development. But the application of the balloon catheters carries with it the risk of arterial injury, thrombosis, embolism, and loss of life or limb. A 53-year-old man was admitted to other hospital due to a intermittent claudication in his right leg for 10 years. and PTA was performed at that hospital. Thereafter he was transferred to our hospital because of coldness, pulselessness, rest pain, ischemic ulcer, and progressing gangrene at the anterior aspect of left lower leg. The left lower extremity was salvaged by left ilio-femoral bypass and later saphenous in situ femoro-popliteal bypass.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제32권12호
• /
• pp.1123-1126
• /
• 1999

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) technique has been much developed but CABG under cardiopulmonary bypass has the unavoidable deficits such as generalized inflammatory reaction from cardiopulmonary bypass and myocardial ischemia from aortic-cross clamp. There has been remarkable advancement of CABG without cadiopulmonary bypass. We performed CABG successfully without cardiopulmonary bypass. We performed CABG successfully without cardiopulmonary bypass in two patients with multivessel coronary disease who were failed to intervene with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. We herein report the two cases.

• Korean Circulation Journal
• /
• 제53권3호
• /
• pp.113-133
• /
• 2023

Owing to a large-jeopardized myocardium, left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) represents the substantial high-risk anatomical subset of obstructive coronary artery disease. For several decades, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been the "gold standard" treatment for LMCAD. Along with advances in CABG, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has also dramatically evolved over time in conjunction with advances in the stent or device technology, adjunct pharmacotherapy, accumulated experiences, and practice changes, establishing its position as a safe, reasonable treatment option for such a complex disease. Until recently, several randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, and observational registries comparing PCI and CABG for LMCAD have shown comparable long-term survival with tradeoffs between early and late risk-benefit of each treatment. Despite this, there are still several unmet issues for revascularization strategy and management for LMCAD. This review article summarized updated knowledge on evolution and clinical evidence on the treatment of LMCAD, with a focus on the comparison of state-of-the-art PCI with CABG.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제54권2호
• /
• pp.150-153
• /
• 2021

Moyamoya disease (MMD) is characterized by progressive steno-occlusive lesions of the distal or proximal branch of the internal carotid arteries, and cerebrovascular symptoms are its major complications. Extracranial vascular involvement including the coronary artery has been reported, and some case reports have described variant angina or myocardial infarction. However, no report has yet described a case of myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Here, we present a patient with MMD who suffered cardiac arrest caused by myocardial infarction due to a coronary spasm after offpump CABG and who was discharged successfully after treatment with a veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator and percutaneous coronary intervention.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제39권8호
• /
• pp.640-642
• /
• 2006

경피적 관상동맥 중재술 시 사용되는 가이드 와이어의 골절은 드문 합병증이다. 골절로 인하여 관상동맥내에 위치하는 가이드 와이어는 혈관 내막 손상과 혈소판의 응집을 촉발하여 혈전 생성을 야기할 수 있다. 좌전하행지에 위치하여 안정 시 흉통을 유발한 가이드 와이어를 성공적으로 제거하고 관상동맥 우회술을 시행하였기에 보고하는 바이다.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제33권7호
• /
• pp.576-580
• /
• 2000

경심근 레이저 혈류 재건술(transmyocardial laser revascularization, TMR)은 현재 허혈성 심질환 환자에게 널리 사용되고 있는 시술인 경피적 관상동맥 확장술(percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, PTCA)과 관상동맥 우회로술(coronary artery bypass grafting, CABG)에 적응이 되지 않는 환자들에게서 단독 치료 방법으로서 자리를 잡아가고 있다. 본원에서는 관상동맥 우회로술 후에 협심증이 재발한 환자 3 례에서 단독 치료로서 경심근 레이저를 사용하였기에 그 경험을 보고하는 바이다.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.373-378
• /
• 1988

Since the introduction of percutaneous; transluminal coronary angioplasty[PTCA] by Grunt-zig in 1977, this is widely used in some patients with coronary artery disease and is an effective alternative to surgery for many patients. Indications for emergency coronary artery bypass graft[CABG] after PTCA are prolonged chest pain, worsening of coronary artery obstruction, "current of injury" by electrocardiogram, cardiogenic shock, and in a lesser incidence, ventricular fibrillation, coronary artery dissection[without obstruction], heart block, and intractable cardiac arrest. Recently, we have experienced one case of emergency CABG following unsuccessful PTCA. The patient was 54 year-old male and admitted with complaint of angina pectoris. The routine electrocardiogram revealed within normal limit. The treadmill test revealed severe chest pain after 2 min. exercise. Coronary cineangiogram revealed 95% segmental stenosis of the proximal right coronary artery. Our cardiologist was planned PTCA. During PTCA, severe chest pain and ischemic pattern on electrocardiogram were developed. But they were not relieved even by morphine and nitroglycerin till 90 min. So we performed emergency single coronary artery bypass graft from aorta to proximal right coronary artery with great saphenous vein. The patient had an excellent postoperative recovery and was free from anginal attack. He has shown striking improvement in general status[NYHA functional class 1] during 6 months after operation.operation.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제50권4호
• /
• pp.247-254
• /
• 2017

Background: Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) was developed to combine the advantages of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, it is still controversial whether it is more optimal to perform CABG or PCI first. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of these 2 approaches. Methods: Eighty patients who underwent HCR from May 2010 to December 2015 were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. The CABG-first group comprised 12 patients and the PCI-first group comprised 68 patients. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital perioperative factors, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), and the incidence of repeated revascularization, especially for the target vessel lesion. Results: No significant difference was found in the amount of postoperative bleeding (p=0.239). The incidence of MACCEs was similar between the CABG-first and PCI-first groups (1 of 12 [8.3%] vs. 5 of 68 [7.4%], p>0.999). Repeated revascularization was performed on 3 patients (25%) in the CABG-first and 9 patients (13.2%) in the PCI-first group (p=0.376). Conclusion: There were no significant differences in postoperative and medium-term outcomes between the CABG-first and PCI-first groups. Based on these results, it can be inferred that it is safe to opt for either CABG or PCI as the primary procedure in 2-stage HCR.