• 제목/요약/키워드: Peer Assessment

검색결과 151건 처리시간 0.014초

The Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET to Differentiate Subtypes of Dementia: The Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Seunghee Na;Dong Woo Kang;Geon Ha Kim;Ko Woon Kim;Yeshin Kim;Hee-Jin Kim;Kee Hyung Park;Young Ho Park;Gihwan Byeon;Jeewon Suh;Joon Hyun Shin;YongSoo Shim;YoungSoon Yang;Yoo Hyun Um;Seong-il Oh;Sheng-Min Wang;Bora Yoon;Hai-Jeon Yoon;Sun Min Lee;Juyoun Lee;Jin San Lee;Hak Young Rhee;Jae-Sung Lim;Young Hee Jung;Juhee Chin;Yun Jeong Hong;Hyemin Jang;Hongyoon Choi;Miyoung Choi;Jae-Won Jang;Korean Dementia Association
    • 대한치매학회지
    • /
    • 제23권1호
    • /
    • pp.54-66
    • /
    • 2024
  • Background and Purpose: Dementia subtypes, including Alzheimer's dementia (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), pose diagnostic challenges. This review examines the effectiveness of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG PET) in differentiating these subtypes for precise treatment and management. Methods: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted using databases like PubMed and Embase to identify studies on the diagnostic utility of 18F-FDG PET in dementia. The search included studies up to November 16, 2022, focusing on peer-reviewed journals and applying the goldstandard clinical diagnosis for dementia subtypes. Results: From 12,815 articles, 14 were selected for final analysis. For AD versus FTD, the sensitivity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.98) and specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70-0.92). In the case of AD versus DLB, 18F-FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.70-0.92). Lastly, when differentiating AD from non-AD dementias, the sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91) and the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91). The studies mostly used case-control designs with visual and quantitative assessments. Conclusions: 18F-FDG PET exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating dementia subtypes, particularly AD, FTD, and DLB. This method, while not a standalone diagnostic tool, significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in uncertain cases, complementing clinical assessments and structural imaging.