• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2018년도 학술발표회
• /
• pp.437-437
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 댐 후보지에 대한 우선순위 분석이 결측 정보에 따라 다기준 의사결정 방법 및 결측정보 접근방법에 따라 어떻게 달라지는지를 조사하였다. 전략환경평가(Strategic Environmental Assessment, SEA)는 한국의 댐 건설 장기 계획에서 환경 및 생태학적 영향을 기반으로 한 지속가능한 댐 후보지 선정에 적용되고 있다. 그러나 특정 정보가 결측된 경우 SEA는 댐 후보지를 선정하는 데 어려움이 있다. 본 연구에서는 다기준 의사결정 방법으로 AHP, ELECTRE III, PROMETHEE II, Compromise Programming을 적용하였고, 결측 정보 보완을 위해 이항분포와 균등분포형을 사용하였다. 본 연구에서는 전국의 댐 선정 후보지에 적용하여 다중 기준 의사 결정기법과 정보 생성 방법에 의존하여 결과를 비교하였다. 그 결과, 이항분포형을 적용한 결과가 균등분포형을 적용한 결과보다 보다 명백한 우선순위를 보여 주었다. 또한, 다기준 의사결정방법에 따라서는 댐선정 후보지 결과가 달라지지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서, 다기준 의사결정방법 적용시, 결측 정보를 생성하기 위해 이항분포를 사용하면 균등분포 적용시보다 우선순위를 제공하는데 더 효과적이라고 판단된다.

• Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology(JNFCWT)
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.47-58
• /
• 2019

The paper presents the results of a multi-criteria comparative evaluation of 12 feasible Russian nuclear energy deployment scenarios with thermal and fast reactors in a closed nuclear fuel cycle. The comparative evaluation was performed based on 6 performance indicators and 5 different MCDA methods (Simple Scoring Model, MAVT / MAUT, AHP, TOPSIS, PROMETHEE) in accordance with the recommendations elaborated by the IAEA/INPRO section. It is shown that the use of different MCDA methods to compare the nuclear energy deployment scenarios, despite some differences in the rankings, leads to well-coordinated and similar results. Taking into account the uncertainties in the weights within a multi-attribute model, it was possible to rank the scenarios in the absence of information regarding the relative importance of performance indicators and determine the preference probability for a certain nuclear energy deployment scenario. Based on the results of the uncertainty/sensitivity analysis and additional analysis of alternatives as well as the whole set of graphical and attribute data, it was possible to identify the most promising nuclear energy deployment scenario under the assumptions made.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제55권1호
• /
• pp.52-62
• /
• 2023

Various decontamination technologies have been developed for removing contaminated areas in industries. Although it is important to consider parameters such as safety, cost, and time when selecting the decontamination technology, till date their comparative study is missing. Furthermore, different decontamination technologies influence the decontamination effects in different ways. Therefore, this study compares different decontamination techniques for the steam generator using a multicriteria decision-making method. A steam generator is a large device comprising both low- and very low-level waste (LLW, VLLW) and reflects the difference in weights of the standards according to the classification of the waste. For LLW and VLLW decontaminations, chemical oxidizing reduction decontamination (CORD) and decontamination grit blasting were used as the preferred techniques, respectively, considering the purpose of decontamination differs based on the initial state of waste. An expert survey revealed that safety in LLW and waste minimization in VLLW exhibited high preference. This evaluation method can be applied not only to the comparison between each process, but also to the creation of process scenarios. Therefore, determining the decontamination approach using logical decision-making methods may improve the safety and economic feasibility of each step in the decommissioning process and ensure a public acceptance.