• Title/Summary/Keyword: P형 슈미트해머

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Influence of Material Factors on Estimation of Compressive Strength of Concrete by P Type Schmidt Rammer (P형 슈미트해머에 의한 콘크리트의 압축강도 추정에 미치는 재료요인의 영향)

  • Han Cheon-Goo;Lee Yong-Sung;Han Mn-Cheol
    • Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute
    • /
    • v.16 no.4 s.82
    • /
    • pp.459-465
    • /
    • 2004
  • The present paper is intended to investigate the influence of materials such as cement, mineral admixture and aggregate, on the estimation of compressive strength by P type schmidt hammer. According to the results, the materials of concrete, such as the types of cement, the replacing ratio of mineral admixture, the kinds and maximum size of aggregate, hardly influence on non-destructive test by P type schmidt hammer except for alumina cement, hence, P type schmidt can be applicable to most of the concrete with a wide range. Since the correlativity between the rebound value of P type schmidt hammer and compressive strength is very favorable(above coefficient of correlation 0.96) regardless of materials, it is considered that compressive strength can be estimated comparatively exactly by P type schmidt hammer. The estimating formula of compressive strength by rebound value are derived from this experiment as following. $\cdot$Horizontal strike : Fc = 0.765RH - 5.74 (R=0.965) $\cdot$ Vertical strike Fc = 0.793RV - 8.66 (R=0.959)

Determination of Removal Time of the Side Form in High Strength Concrete (고강도콘크리트 시공시 측면 거푸집 탈형시기의 결정)

  • Han Cheon-Goo;Han Min-Cheol
    • Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute
    • /
    • v.16 no.3 s.81
    • /
    • pp.327-334
    • /
    • 2004
  • In this paper, method for the determination of removal time of the side forms in high strength concrete are discussed using the estimation model of compressive strength development, the development of bond strength and rebound number of P type Schmidt hammer in order to review the validity of existing regulation as to side form removal and offer effective quality control method. According to the results, as W/B increases by $10\%$, the setting time is shortened by about 2 hours. In the scope of the paper, required time to gain 8MPa of compressive strength is determined about 17 ${\~}$20 hours of age and $21{\~}25^{\circ}D{\cdot}D$ of maturity. Bond strength between form and concrete shows the highest value around final setting time, but decreases drastically after that. Amount of concrete sticking on the form is large before setting completed, but after that, its amount shows decline tendency. The rebound value test with P type schmidt hammer can be started faster by 2${\~}$3 hours than compressive strength test. It is also confirmed that the removal of forms is possible when the rebound value of P type schmidt hammer is more than 32. It is found from the results that existing regulation regarding removal time of the side form of high strength concrete provided in KCI needs no revision because required time to gain the strength provided in KCI has no adverse effect on strength development at early age and surface condition during stripping the side form. Effective procedure to decide the removal time of side form can be performed by applying P type Schmidt hammer.