• Title/Summary/Keyword: Overall technical efficiency

Search Result 102, Processing Time 0.025 seconds

0.1 MW Test Bed CO2 Capture Studies with New Absorbent (KoSol-5) (신 흡수제(KoSol-5)를 적용한 0.1 MW급 Test Bed CO2 포집 성능시험)

  • Lee, Junghyun;Kim, Beom-Ju;Shin, Su Hyun;kwak, No-Sang;Lee, Dong Woog;Lee, Ji Hyun;Shim, Jae-Goo
    • Applied Chemistry for Engineering
    • /
    • v.27 no.4
    • /
    • pp.391-396
    • /
    • 2016
  • The absorption efficiency of amine $CO_2$ absorbent (KoSol-5) developed by KEPCO research institute was evaluated using a 0.1 MW test bed. The performance of post-combustion technology to capture two tons of $CO_2$ per day from a slipstream of the flue gas from a 500 MW coal-fired power station was first confirmed in Korea. Also the analysis of the absorbent regeneration energy was conducted to suggest the reliable data for the KoSol-5 absorbent performance. And we tested energy reduction effects by improving the absorption tower inter-cooling system. Overall results showed that the $CO_2$ removal rate met the technical guideline ($CO_2$ removal rate : 90%) suggested by IEA-GHG. Also the regeneration energy of the KoSol-5 showed about $3.05GJ/tonCO_2$ which was about 25% reduction in the regeneration energy compared to that of using the commercial absorbent MEA (Monoethanolamine). Based on current experiments, the KoSol-5 absorbent showed high efficiency for $CO_2$ capture. It is expected that the application of KoSol-5 to commercial scale $CO_2$ capture plants could dramatically reduce $CO_2$ capture costs.

In Situ Surfactant Flushing of Contaminated Site (계면 활성제를 이용한 In Situ 토양 세척)

  • 염익태;안규홍
    • Journal of Korea Soil Environment Society
    • /
    • v.2 no.2
    • /
    • pp.9-24
    • /
    • 1997
  • Surfactant-aided in situ soil flushing has been proposed as an alternative for the expensive and time consuming 'pump and treat' technology in remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater Injected surfactants can effectively solubilize contaminants sorbed to the soil matrix or nonaqueous phase liquids(NAPLs) in residual saturation. The contaminants solubilized in groundwater are recovered and treated further. The theoretical background of the technology and the results of the field operations, mostly in the US. were summarized. In addition, the factors crucial to the successful application of the technology were discussed. Cost analyses and technical limitations in current applications were also discussed. In conclusion, it is likely that in situ surfactant flushing become a viable option for soil remediation in limited cases. Currently, further advances with respect to operation cost and to treatment efficiency are required for more extensive application of the technology. However, the current trends in soil remediation, specially the growing emphasis on risk based corrective action and natural attenuation, will increase the competitiveness of the technology. For example, removal of easily washable contaminants by short term soil flushing followed by long term monitoring and natural attenuation can greatly reduce the operation cost and time.

  • PDF