• Title/Summary/Keyword: Other-Customer's Misbehavior

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Negative Spillover Effects of Other-Customer Failure in Airline Context

  • Kim, Mi-Jeong;Park, Chul-Ju;Park, Jae-Sung
    • Journal of Distribution Science
    • /
    • v.15 no.1
    • /
    • pp.15-20
    • /
    • 2017
  • Purpose - Other customers within the same service environment do influence a customer' attitude and behavior toward a service firm. Specially, other customers' misbehaviour and various service problems stemmed from them could make the other customers suffer some bad experiences. However, there are few studies to answer how the spillover effect of a service failure arisen from other customers' misbehavior. This study is aimed to examine how service failure due to the dysfunctional behavior of other customers has negative effects on customer evaluation with the service provider. Research design, data, and methodology - Data were collected from a survey based on consumers' retrospective experiences in airline service context. The hypothesized relationships were tested conducting structural equation modeling. Results - Our results show that the attribution of a firm responsibility for other-customer failure has a positive influence on customer's recovery expectation, in turn, it is negatively related to customer satisfaction. Furthermore, perceived service provider's efforts positively influence customer satisfaction. Conclusions - Although a service failure was caused by other customer's misbehavior, employees should be able to alleviate any bad feelings of the affected customers. Furthermore, service providers should provide proper recovery efforts for solving problems caused by the other customers for the wounded customers.

Customer Misbehavior in Retail Settings: The Retail Employee Perspective (유통환경에서의 고객 부정행동 고찰: 유통업체 종업원 관점)

  • Park, Kyung-Ae
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles
    • /
    • v.34 no.7
    • /
    • pp.1220-1231
    • /
    • 2010
  • This study examined customer misbehaviors in retail settings by identifying behavioral patterns and exploring behavioral backgrounds and consequences from the employee's perspectives. Qualitative data were collected from an individual interview method, and 222 interviews were analyzed. Customer misbehavior was categorized into unethical returns, problem behaviors in service encounters, unreasonable demands, shoplifting/fraud, ill-mannered behaviors, and selfish behaviors. Behavioral backgrounds included dissatisfaction, unreasonable expectations, actively benefiting of service failures, taking advantage of service standards, illegitimate complaints, monetary gains, transferring responsibility, and demanding special treatment. Employees experienced stress facing misbehaving customers with no other choice except to accept misbehaviors and learned misbehaviors as customers themselves. The study further discusses the implications.

Responses to Customer Anger in the Service Encounter: Retail Employee vs Other Customer Perspectives (서비스접점에서 고객의 화에 대한 반응: 판매원 대 다른 고객의 관점)

  • Park, Kyung-Ae
    • Fashion & Textile Research Journal
    • /
    • v.12 no.5
    • /
    • pp.591-598
    • /
    • 2010
  • Customer misbehavior can affect dissatisfaction and negative behavioral responses of other customers at the service encounter. This study explored other customer and retail employee reponses to customer anger and aggressive behaviors at the service encounter by examining the perceived wrongness of such behaviors under different situations and comparing the two perspectives of retail employees and consumers. Three scenarios were developed representing different situations including firm's responsibility, both of customer and employee responsibilities, and uncontrollable one. Data were collected from individual interviews with 222 retail employees and 149 consumers. The results showed that the consumers' perceived wrongness of customer aggressions were higher comparing to that of employees. The reasons of perceived wrongness were different by three situations implying that responsibility and controllability affected the perceived wrongness. The study further discusses implications.