• 제목/요약/키워드: Nitrogen split application

검색결과 102건 처리시간 0.015초

답압(踏壓)으로 훼손(毁損)된 임간나지(林間裸地)의 임상식생복원(林床植生復元)에 관한 연구(硏究)(I) -임상식생복원(林床植生復元)에 미치는 파종(播種), 시비(施肥) 및 표토처리효과 (表土處理效果)- (Studies on Restoration of Forest-Floor Vegetation Devastated by Recreational Trampling (I) -Seeding, Fertilizing and Soil Surface Treatment Effect on Restoration of Forest-Floor Vegetation-)

  • 오구균;우보명
    • 한국산림과학회지
    • /
    • 제81권1호
    • /
    • pp.53-65
    • /
    • 1992
  • 본(本) 연구(硏究)는 자연성(自然性)을 유지(維持)하고 자연생태계(自然生態系)를 보전(保全)하면서 동시에 산림휴양(山林休養)에 이용(利用)하려는 산림지역(山林地域)에서 이용객(利用客)들의 답압(踏壓)에 의하여 훼손(毁損)된 임상식생(林床植生)을 복원(復元)할 수 있는 방법을 구명(究明)하기 위하여 파종(播種), 시비(施肥) 및 표토처리(表土處理)의 요인실험(要因實驗)을 임간나지(林間裸地)에서 4년 동안 (1987~1990) 실시하였다. 경기도(京畿道) 안양시(安養市) 관악산(冠岳山) 수목원(樹木園)에서 임상식생복원실험(林床植生復元實驗)을 위하여 분할구배치법(分割區配置法)(주구(主區): 시비(施肥), 세구(細區): 표토처리(表土處理)${\times}$파종(播種)), 난괴법(亂塊法)(시비(施肥)${\times}$파종(播種))에 의한 요인실험(要因實驗)을 3반복(反復)으로 실시한 바 다음과 같은 연구결과(硏究結果)를 얻었다. 표토(表土)의 연화(軟化)를 위한 굴혈처리후(堀穴處理後) 70% 피복도(被覆度)를 나타내는 볏짚거적 피복처리(被覆處理)가 임간나지(林間裸地)에서 파종(播種)한 종자(種子)의 발아(發芽), 활착(活着) 및 생장(生長)에 미치는 효과(效果)가 가장 크게 나타났으며, 특히 볏짚거적 피복처리(被覆處理)는 표토침식지(表土浸蝕地)의 표토안정(表土安定) 및 치수활착(稚樹活着)에 미치는 효과가 양호하였고, 삽으로 파서 뒤엎은 완전표토연화처리(完全表土軟化處理)는 식생천이계열상(植生遷移系列上) 후기(後期)에 속하는 수종(樹種)들의 발아(發芽), 활착(活着) 및 초기생장(初期生長)에 특히 효과적(效果的)인 것으로 나타났다. 다년간(多年間) 계속적인 답압(踏壓)으로 임상표토(林床表土)의 토괴경도(土壞硬度)가 높아지고, 또 자생식물(自生植物)들의 종자(種子)가 잔류(殘留)할 수 있는 표토(表土)가 유실(流失)된 임간나지(林間裸地)에서 조기(早期)에 임상식생(林床植生)을 복원(復元)할 때에는 식생천이계열상(植生遷移系列上) 초기(初期)에서 중기계열(中期系列)에 속하는 자생수종(自生樹種)들을 파종(播種)하는 것이 효과적(效果的)인 것으로 나타났다. 자생식물(自生植物)들의 종자(種子)가 잔류(殘留)할 수 있는 표토(表土)가 유실(流失)된 임간나지(林間裸地)에서 임상식생복원(林床植生復元)(착생개체수(着生個體數)와 수관면적(樹冠面積))에는 파종(播種), 표토굴혈연화(表土掘穴軟化) 및 볏짚거적피복처리시(被覆處理時)에 약 3년이 소요되었다. 표사연화처리(表士軟化處理)는 처리 후 약 2년 동안 표토연화효과(表土軟化效果)가 지속되었으며 또 파종(播種) 및 표토처리(表土處理)는 활착개체수(活着個體數) 증대(增大)를 통해 표토연화(表土軟化), 낙엽퇴고정(落葉堆固定) 등 표토환경개선(表土環境改善)에 영향(影響)을 미치었다. 실험지표토(實驗地表土)의 열악(劣惡)한 물리적조건(物理的條件) 즉, 낮은 보수능(保水能)과 과건피해(過乾被害), 표토침식(表土浸蝕)으로 인한 치수(稚樹)들의 뿌리 노출과 고사(枯死) 및 양료유실(養料流失) 등으로 임상시비효과(林床施肥效果)는 대체적으로 나타나지 않았다. 그러나, 질소(窒素)와 인산시비(燐酸施肥)는 식생천이계열(植生遷移系列) 후기수종(後期樹種)들의 치수활착율(稚樹活着率)을 증진(增進)시키는 데는 효과적(效果的)이었다.

  • PDF

불량환경하(不良環境下)에서의 제초제(除草劑) 약해(藥害)와 경감기술(輕減技術) (Herbicidal Phytotoxicity under Adverse Environments and Countermeasures)

  • 권용웅;황형식;강병화
    • 한국잡초학회지
    • /
    • 제13권4호
    • /
    • pp.210-233
    • /
    • 1993
  • The herbicide has become indispensable as much as nitrogen fertilizer in Korean agriculture from 1970 onwards. It is estimated that in 1991 more than 40 herbicides were registered for rice crop and treated to an area 1.41 times the rice acreage ; more than 30 herbicides were registered for field crops and treated to 89% of the crop area ; the treatment acreage of 3 non-selective foliar-applied herbicides reached 2,555 thousand hectares. During the last 25 years herbicides have benefited the Korean farmers substantially in labor, cost and time of farming. Any herbicide which causes crop injury in ordinary uses is not allowed to register in most country. Herbicides, however, can cause crop injury more or less when they are misused, abused or used under adverse environments. The herbicide use more than 100% of crop acreage means an increased probability of which herbicides are used wrong or under adverse situation. This is true as evidenced by that about 25% of farmers have experienced the herbicide caused crop injury more than once during last 10 years on authors' nationwide surveys in 1992 and 1993 ; one-half of the injury incidences were with crop yield loss greater than 10%. Crop injury caused by herbicide had not occurred to a serious extent in the 1960s when the herbicides fewer than 5 were used by farmers to the field less than 12% of total acreage. Farmers ascribed about 53% of the herbicidal injury incidences at their fields to their misuses such as overdose, careless or improper application, off-time application or wrong choice of the herbicide, etc. While 47% of the incidences were mainly due to adverse natural conditions. Such misuses can be reduced to a minimum through enhanced education/extension services for right uses and, although undesirable, increased farmers' experiences of phytotoxicity. The most difficult primary problem arises from lack of countermeasures for farmers to cope with various adverse environmental conditions. At present almost all the herbicides have"Do not use!" instructions on label to avoid crop injury under adverse environments. These "Do not use!" situations Include sandy, highly percolating, or infertile soils, cool water gushing paddy, poorly draining paddy, terraced paddy, too wet or dry soils, days of abnormally cool or high air temperature, etc. Meanwhile, the cultivated lands are under poor conditions : the average organic matter content ranges 2.5 to 2.8% in paddy soil and 2.0 to 2.6% in upland soil ; the canon exchange capacity ranges 8 to 12 m.e. ; approximately 43% of paddy and 56% of upland are of sandy to sandy gravel soil ; only 42% of paddy and 16% of upland fields are on flat land. The present situation would mean that about 40 to 50% of soil applied herbicides are used on the field where the label instructs "Do not use!". Yet no positive effort has been made for 25 years long by government or companies to develop countermeasures. It is a really sophisticated social problem. In the 1960s and 1970s a subside program to incoporate hillside red clayish soil into sandy paddy as well as campaign for increased application of compost to the field had been operating. Yet majority of the sandy soils remains sandy and the program and campaign had been stopped. With regard to this sandy soil problem the authors have developed a method of "split application of a herbicide onto sandy soil field". A model case study has been carried out with success and is introduced with key procedure in this paper. Climate is variable in its nature. Among the climatic components sudden fall or rise in temperature is hardly avoidable for a crop plant. Our spring air temperature fluctuates so much ; for example, the daily mean air temperature of Inchon city varied from 6.31 to $16.81^{\circ}C$ on April 20, early seeding time of crops, within${\times}$2Sd range of 30 year records. Seeding early in season means an increased liability to phytotoxicity, and this will be more evident in direct water-seeding of rice. About 20% of farmers depend on the cold underground-water pumped for rice irrigation. If the well is deep over 70m, the fresh water may be about $10^{\circ}C$ cold. The water should be warmed to about $20^{\circ}C$ before irrigation. This is not so practiced well by farmers. In addition to the forementioned adverse conditions there exist many other aspects to be amended. Among them the worst for liquid spray type herbicides is almost total lacking in proper knowledge of nozzle types and concern with even spray by the administrative, rural extension officers, company and farmers. Even not available in the market are the nozzles and sprayers appropriate for herbicides spray. Most people perceive all the pesticide sprayers same and concern much with the speed and easiness of spray, not with correct spray. There exist many points to be improved to minimize herbicidal phytotoxicity in Korea and many ways to achieve the goal. First of all it is suggested that 1) the present evaluation of a new herbicide at standard and double doses in registration trials is to be an evaluation for standard, double and triple doses to exploit the response slope in making decision for approval and recommendation of different dose for different situation on label, 2) the government is to recognize the facts and nature of the present problem to correct the present misperceptions and to develop an appropriate national program for improvement of soil conditions, spray equipment, extention manpower and services, 3) the researchers are to enhance researches on the countermeasures and 4) the herbicide makers/dealers are to correct their misperceptions and policy for sales, to develop database on the detailed use conditions of consumer one by one and to serve the consumers with direct counsel based on the database.

  • PDF