• Title/Summary/Keyword: Newcatle disease virus

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Demonstration of Newcastle Disease Virus Antigens in Paraffin Embedded Tissues of Experimentally Infected Chickens Using Peroxidase-antiperoxidase(PAP) Technique (Peroxidase-antiperoxidaes법을 이용한 실험감염 계의 조직내 뉴캣슬병 바이러스 항원동정)

  • 노환국;신종백;임기재;김병지
    • Korean Journal of Veterinary Service
    • /
    • v.15 no.2
    • /
    • pp.184-194
    • /
    • 1992
  • This study was done to identify Newcastle disease virus(NDV) antigens in paraffin sections of various organs from experimentally NDV-infected chicken using peroxidase-antiperoxidase(PAP) technique. Sections were Incubated with rabbit anti-NDV polyclonal as first antibody, followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugate and peroxidase anti-peroxidase ( PAP ). Positive reactions were often detected in the epithelim of trachea and in the lymphocyte of spleen at 24 hours after virus inoculation. The viral antigen was localized mainly in the cytoplasm of infected cells. The method approved to be highly specific for the indetification of NDV and allowed a precise localization of the viral antigens in infected cells.

  • PDF

Studies on the Immunization Against Newcastle Disease III. Investions on the Immunity of Newcatle Disease with Special Reference to Vaccination Program and Route (뉴캣슬병 면역에 대한 검토 III. 예방접종 프로그램과 접종경노를 중심으로 한 뉴캣슬병 면역능 검토)

  • 이학철;정유열
    • Korean Journal of Poultry Science
    • /
    • v.8 no.2
    • /
    • pp.77-89
    • /
    • 1981
  • The experimental study was undertaken to confirm the effect of vaccination of birds with Newcastle disease (ND) vaccines on the Market by use of th. various vaccination programs. Sixteen groups of birds varying from 2 to f days of age, which were originated from hyper-immunised hens against ND were immunised by three different ways, a live vaccine only, a killed vaccine only, and the combination of a live and killed vaccine according to the each schedule of employed programs. In the administration of a live vaccine only, birds were immunized by one of following methods, the combination of intranasal and intraocular inoculation, intramuscular inoculation, via drinking water and the double inoculation by spray and drinking water application. Except for the double application, all the birds were vaccinated 2,3 or 4 times with two volumes of the virus dose (drinking water application) instructed by the commercial vaccine laboratory, until 21, 28 or 30 days of age, and all the immunized birds 19, 21 or 28 days postvaccination were challenged intramuscularly with 1.0$m\ell$ of 10,000 MLD per $m\ell$ of a virulent ND virus. In the administration of the combination of a live and killed vaccine, birds were immunized 2 or 3 times intranasally at first until 14 or 28 days of age with the same dose of the above experiment of a live vaccine, and then inoculated intramuscularly 1 or 2 times until 60 days of age with 1.0 $m\ell$ of a killed vaccine. And all immunized birds 11 days postvaccination were challenged with the same procedure of the above experiment. In the administration of a killed vaccine only, birds were immunized 3 times intramuscularly until 28 days of age with varied dose (0.2-0.5 $m\ell$) of a killed vaccine and all immunized birds 33 days postvaccination were challenged with the same procedure of the above experiment. The results obtained are summerised as follows: All birds vaccinated by using the combination of a live and killed vaccine program or a killed vaccin only appeared to be refractory. without any sign of illness, to the challenge exposure with 1.0$m\ell$ of 10,000 MLD per $m\ell$ of a virulent ND virus. On the other hand, the survival rates of birds of live vaccine groups immunized by a number of vaccine program such as Salsbury's day old program, 3-3-3 program, the Institute of Veterinary Reserch program and Multiple inoculation program, were 39.58%, 43.7%, 43.75% and 47.80%, respectively. And the survival rates of birds vaccinated with a live vaccine by 4 different ways of administration, i.e., double inoculation by water and aerosol application, intramuscular injection, intranasal instillation and via 4.inking water were 87.50%, 64.06%, 42.18% and 25.00%, respectively.

  • PDF