• Title/Summary/Keyword: Neutropenia

Search Result 202, Processing Time 0.021 seconds

Clinical Response to Etoposide Plus Carboplatin and Topotecan Chemotherapy in Small Cell Lung Cancer (소세포폐암에 대한 Etoposide와 Carboplatin 병합요법과 Topotecan 화학요법의 효과)

  • Park, Kyung Hwa;Cho, Gye Jung;Ju, Jin Young;Son, Chang Young;Wi, Jeong Ook;Kim, Kyu Sik;Kim, Yu Il;Lim, Sung Chul;Kim, Young Chul;Park, Kyung Ok
    • Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
    • /
    • v.54 no.4
    • /
    • pp.415-428
    • /
    • 2003
  • Background : This study assessed the efficacy and toxicity of etoposide and carboplatin(EC) combination regimen as a first line therapy for small cell lung cancer(SCLC), and determined the efficacy and toxicity of topotecan for relapsed SCLC. Methods : One hundred and ten patients with previously untreated SCLC received etoposide($100mg/m^2$ i.v., day 1 to 3) and carboplatin($300mg/m^2$ i.v., day 1) combination chemotherapy every 3 weeks. For patients with relapsed SCLC after EC therapy, topotecan($1.5mg/m^2$) was administered for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Response rate, survival and toxicity profiles were assessed. Response was recorded as CR(complete remission), PR(partial remission), SD(stable disease) and PD(progressive disease). Results : One hundred and one patients were assessed for response to EC. Overall response rate to EC was 57.4%(CR 15.8%, PR 41.6%) with a time to progression of 10.3 months(median). The toxicity was tolerable and there was no treatment-related death. Twenty one relapsed SCLC patients were treated with topotecan. Of those who relapsed within 3 months of EC(refractory relapse, RR), 15.4%(2/13) showed PR, while of those who relapsed after 3 months(sensitive relapse, SR), 25%(2/8) exhibited PR. Grade 4 neutropenia was noted in 9.5% and 14.3% showed thrombocytopenia(G4). Conclusion : The EC regimen showed a moderate response rate for SCLC with minimal toxicity. The use of topotecan for relapsed SCLC warrants further investigation.

Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine as a Combination Chemotherapy for the Second-Line Treatment of Nonsmall Cell Lung Carcinoma (비소세포 폐암 환자의 2차 치료로서 Gemcitabine과 Vinorelbine의 병합 요법의 효과)

  • Lee, EunJoo;Ha, EunSil;Park, SangHoon;Hur, GyuYoung;Jung, KiHwan;Jeong, HyeCheol;Lee, SungYong;Kim, JeHyeong;Lee, SangYeub;Sin, Chol;Shim, JaeJeong;In, KwangHo;Kang, KyungHo;Yoo, SeHwa
    • Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
    • /
    • v.59 no.5
    • /
    • pp.510-516
    • /
    • 2005
  • Backgroud : Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in Korea and the number of lung cancer deaths is increasing. The higher response rates, decreased toxicity and improved performance status of the first-line treatments have resulted in an increased number of patients becoming candidates for second-line therapy. Several new antineoplastic agents, including gemcitabine, docetaxel and paclitaxel, have recently demonstrated second-line activity. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine and vinorelbine as combination chemotherapy for Korean patients with NSCLC as a second-line treatment. Methods : Sixty response-evaluable patients were enrolled from December 2000 to July 2003. We conducted a phase II study of a combination gemcitabine and vinorelbine chemotherapy for patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC that was stage IIIB and IV disease at the time of diagnosis, and the disease had progressed onward or the patients had relapsed after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. They were treated with intravenous gemcitabine $1000mg/m^2$ and intravenous vinorelbine $25mg/m^2$ on days 1 and 8. This chemotherapy regimen was repeated every 3 weeks. Results : A total of 215 cycles of treatment were given and the mean number of cycles was 3.6 cycles. All the patients were evaluable for the toxicity profile. The response rate was 10% according to the WHO criteria. The median progression free survival was 3.8 months and the median survival time was 10.1 months. The 1-year survival rate was 32.9%. Grade III and IV neutropenia were seen in 20 (33.3%) and 7 (11.7%) patients, respectively. Conclusion : The combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine is active and well tolerated as a second-line therapy for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.