• 제목/요약/키워드: Moral Mind

검색결과 118건 처리시간 0.022초

"동의보감(東醫寶鑑)"과 "동의수세보원사상초본권(東醫壽世保元四象草本卷)"에 나타난 양생관(養生觀)에 대한 고찰 (A study of preservation of health in the ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Bogam${\lrcorner}$ and ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Soose Bowon Sasang Chobongyun${\lrcorner}$)

  • 이수경;이의주;고병희;송일병;정용재
    • 사상체질의학회지
    • /
    • 제14권2호
    • /
    • pp.25-34
    • /
    • 2002
  • To understand characteristic of preservation of health in Sasang constitutional medicine, 1 first study preservation of health In ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Bogam${\lrcorner}$, and then study preservation of health in the ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Soose Bowon Sasang Chobongyun${\lrcorner}$ particularly Inherent vitality(命脈實數) and Regimen in ordinary life(生息充補之道) which shows early thought of Lee Je-ma. I acquire relation and difference between ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Bogam${\lrcorner}$ and Dongyi Soose Bowon Sasang Chobongyun${\lrcorner}$, and conclude as follows. 1. In preservation of health ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Bogam${\lrcorner}$ says Ups and downs of Qi according to degree, tells congenital health and acquired care of health, grades Jin-In, Ji-In, Seong-In, Hyeon-In according to degree of moral culture, and especially emphasizes managing mind which is based on Taoism. 2. In ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Soose Bowon Sasang Chobongyun${\lrcorner}$ Dongmu divides human being to Sasangin(Taeyangin, Taeumin, Soyangin, Soeumin) according to Large & small of viscera, and regards as determine lift span and rendition of disease & health according to Inherent vitality which is degree of Small viscera. 3. Inherent vitality of Sasangin is supplemented by Regimen in ordinary life. Because Regimen in ordinary life decreases according to age, Dongmu emphasizes managing mind through an autonomic Knowledge Deed to maintain Regimen in ordinary life. 4. In the way of managing mind ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Bogam${\lrcorner}$ says Taoist moral culture, but Dongmu emphasized control of knowledge and Deed by Confucian moral culture and the mind of control others through confucian self-control.

  • PDF

주자학과 양명학, 그리고 '국학'의 형성 - 주체성과 실심(實心)의 계보학 - (Zhuzi Learning, Yangming Learning, and Formation of "Gukhak": Genealogy of Subjectivity and Silsim)

  • 김우형
    • 한국철학논집
    • /
    • 제58호
    • /
    • pp.307-336
    • /
    • 2018
  • 본고는 정인보의 '국학' 사상에 나타나는 주체성과 실심(實心, 참된 마음) 정신의 역사적 계보를 추적하고 그 특징을 조명하였다. 근세 동아시아 사상사에서 주체성과 실심이 주요 화두로 등장하기 시작한 것은 중국 송대(宋代) 신유학(新儒學)에서 비롯된다. 정이(程?)는 주체의식을 강조한 최초의 사상가이며, 주희(朱熹)와 왕양명(王陽明)은 정이의 주체성의 원리에 입각한 사상을 계승하되 방법론에서 차이를 보일 뿐이다. 조선시대 정제두(鄭齊斗)와 강화학파는 신유학의 주체성과 실심의 정신을 발휘한 하나의 사례이다. 정인보(鄭寅普)는 학맥에 있어 강화학파에 속하지만, 양명학이 실심의 자각과 실천에 있어 더 효과적이라고 보았기 때문에 방법론적으로 활용했을 뿐이다. 특히 주목할 점은, 주체성의 원리가 정인보로 하여금 주희 도덕이론(인심도심론)의 골격을 거의 그대로 따르도록 이끌었다는 점이다. 이기적인 욕구(자사심)를 옳고 마땅한 것을 자각한 마음(실심)으로 통제해야 한다는 주장은, 인심(감각욕구)과 도심(도덕심)의 갈등상황에서 도심을 선택하여 인심이 도심의 명령을 받도록 제어하라는 주희의 견해와 일치한다. 이 같은 윤리학은 행위의 내적 동기나 의무감을 중시하는 입장으로서, 사실상 주희와 왕양명에 있어서도 근본적 차이는 없는 것이다. 적어도 이점에서 근현대 한국학을 유교전통과의 단절이 아닌 연속의 관점에서 바라볼 필요가 있다.

'천지공사'의 종교윤리적 의미에 대한 연구 (A Study on the Religious-Ethical Meaning of 'Reorganizing the order of Heaven and Earth' in the Scripture of Daesoonjinrihoe)

  • 류성민
    • 대순사상논총
    • /
    • 제23권
    • /
    • pp.1-36
    • /
    • 2014
  • The purpose of this study is to research the religious-ethical meaning of the scripture (Jeongyung, 典經) of Daesoonjinrihoe, one of religious orders in Korea. It is 'the reorganizing in the order of heaven and earth' (ROHE, 天地公事)that the believers of Daesoonjinrihoe regard as the essence and basis of their religious belief in Jeongyung, and so I focus on it in this paper. And I have applied the method of religious ethics that recognize the relation religion and morality for understanding religious-ethical meaning of moral principles and norms. In the process of this study I have selected a lot of moral principles, norms and activities in ROHE, and sorted them with their social context of ROHE. In this research I have found some characteristics of ethical norms in the ROHE according to three divisions of ethical category such as personal, social and natural ethics. The understanding of mind is an important point of personal ethic in the ROHE. The mind is understood as the subject and object of personal ethical attitude and volition. So one could have ethical attitude by oneself with mind as subject, and reflect and correct on his ethical faults with the mind as ethical object. The distinctiveness of social ethic in the ROHE is special concerns to the weak at that time such as sick person, illegitimate children, shamans, farmhands and etc. This is a logical consequence of the ethical altruism of the ethic of mutual beneficence(相生) and the dignity of human(人尊) in ROHE. And the ethics of mutual beneficence is applied to natural ethic of ROHE. Since natural world including all sort of plants and animals is intimately related to the human worlds, so it is a desirable attitude for to accommodate to the changes of nature. Even if these characteristics of ethics in ROHE are justified by the religious beliefs, the norms from them are available in our religious pluralistic societies, since they have common ethical values of other religious ethics. It is my concluding remark that religious orders or denominations have to offer a lot of moral norms suitable to religious pluralistic situation. Because it is needed for our society to conquer various sort and kind conflicts among religions, and to act harmoniously together for public peace.

Human Genome 시대에 부응하는 사상체질의학(四象體質醫學)의 역할과 치료정신 (The Role and Treatment Mind of Sasang Constitutional Medicine in Human Genome Age)

  • 송일병
    • 사상체질의학회지
    • /
    • 제15권2호
    • /
    • pp.1-8
    • /
    • 2003
  • 1. Objects of Research This research is purposed to find role and treatment mind of Sasang constitutional medicine in human genome age, through summarizing recognition of human and etiology. treatment on diseases proposed in Sasang constitutional medicine 2. Methods of Research It was researched as bibliologically with Dong-mu's chief medical writings such as ${\ulcorner}Dongyi$ Soose Bowon(東醫壽世保元)${\lrcorner}$, ${\ulcorner}$Dongyi Soose Bowon Sasang Chongyun(東醫壽世保元四象草本卷${\lrcorner}$. 3. Results and Conclusions 1. The outlook on human of Sasang Constitutional Medicine was completed in the base on Confusianism and it recognized that human is consisted with congenital element based on 'Human nature-shape' and acquired element based on Knowledge-Acting. Dong-mu emphasised acquired element than inborn element. 2. Sasang Constitutional Medicine is thought that we ran overcome inborn limitation of each constitution through moral culture of aposteriori Knowledge-Acting. and that self-correction is methods which is applied to treatment of disease recovering Essential Qi of each constitution with moral culture of personality 3. Sasang Constitutional Medicine is recognizing Essential Qi by main standard that foretell prognosis of disease and emphasize recovery of Essential Qi through self-correction than way of 'Assisting-Good Qi' and 'Removig-Bad Qi' in treatment of disease. 4. Self-correction can be divided into non-herbal self-correction and herbal self-correction. Non-herbal self-correction is to control greed by aposteriori Knowledge-Acting and herbal self-correction is to recover Essential Qi by herb. 5. It is thought that the present constitutional disease is consisted by accumulating life habit nature of a disease of ordinary times, and Sasang Constitutional Medicine that present constitutional disease is treated through administration of life habit nature of a disease of ordinary times in Sasang Constitutional Medicine. 6. Treatment mind to correct oneself into Golden Mean through controlling Knowledge-Acting in Sasang Constitutional Medicine may get into important treatment guide of gene medicine age.

  • PDF

유가 공부론과 명상 - 퇴계 활인심방(活人心方)을 응용한 수양치료 모형 - (Confucian Cultivation of Mind and Meditation - The Care Model of Cultivation Applied by Toe-gye' 『The Method on Preservation of Human mind (活人心方)』)

  • 이연도
    • 한국철학논집
    • /
    • 제28호
    • /
    • pp.363-386
    • /
    • 2010
  • 이 논문은 유가 공부론과 명상의 관계에 대해 살펴본 것이다. 최근 우리 사회에는 마음의 병에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있다. 흔히 세계관과 인생관, 가치관에 대한 왜곡된 인식에서 비롯된 마음의 병은 정신의학적 방법으로 치료될 수 없다는 점에서 신경정신과적 질병과는 구분된다. 철학을 비롯하여 문학, 예술 등 다양한 인문학을 활용한 대체치료가 주목받고 있는 것도 이러한 이유에서이다. 명상 또한 이들 가운데 하나이다. '명상'은 흔히 불교에서 발전해 온 것으로 생각되지만, 유학과도 밀접한 연관성을 가지고 있다. 불교의 명상은 현실의 삶을 부정하지만, 유가의 명상 철학은 현실과 자아를 인정하는 데서 출발하고 있다. 또한 유가의 수양론과 명상 철학은 방법론적으로 중요한 의미를 지니고 있다. 일반적으로 진행되는 정신치료나 심리치료는 그 방법이 대개 대화를 통해 이루어진다. '대화치료(talking cure)'는 내담자 스스로 자신의 현 상황을 인지하고, 그 문제를 스스로 발견하는 것을 전제로 한다. 일반적으로 현재 인문학을 응용한 치료가 대상으로 삼고 있는 교정기관이나 군부대와 같은 특수기관 수용자에게는 사용하기에도 적합한 방법이 아니다. 이 점에서 '마음 다스리기'를 강조한 유가의 공부론과 명상법은 응용할 만한 충분한 가치가 있어 보인다. 여기에서는 유가 공부론과 명상의 관계가 이론적으로 어떤 관계인가를 살펴보고, 퇴계의 『활인심방』을 응용하여 인문치료의 한 모형을 제시하였다. 동양의 수양론이 '마음의 병'에 대해 의미있는 이론을 제시하고 있긴 하지만, 이를 구체적으로 현장에서 응용하기란 쉬운 일이 아니다. 이는 수양론 자체가 일생을 두고 수행해야 할 지침이며, 그 성격상 일시적인 수행이나 실습을 통한 효과를 기대하기 어렵기 때문이다. 여기에서 제시하는 수양 치료 모형은 이러한 한계를 전제로 한 것으로, 인문치료의 한국적 모형 개발이라는 목적에 따른 시도이다.

Yorick's "besoin de Voyager": Mobility and Sympathy in Laurence Sterne's Sentimental Journey

  • Choi, Ja Yun
    • 영어영문학
    • /
    • 제64권1호
    • /
    • pp.117-133
    • /
    • 2018
  • This article examines Laurence Sterne's Sentimental Journey in the context of eighteenth-century British travel literature. While literary critics generally read Sterne's work as a sentimental novel, contemporary readers initially interpreted the text as a travel narrative. It is my argument that travel writing, particularly the motion entailed in travelling, plays a significant role in Sterne's critical examination of sympathy and its cultural function during this period. By narrating in great detail his narrator Yorick's mobility and the effects it has on his sentimental encounters, Sterne illustrates how sympathy is not only difficult to activate and therefore requires added stimulation in the form of motion, but also does not necessarily result in charitable actions, a moral failure that is dramatized by the literal distance Yorick maintains from the objects of his sympathy. Calling to mind the figurative distance that constitutes an integral part of Adam Smith's formulation of sympathy in The Theory of Moral Sentiments, the distance Yorick establishes through his travels indicates sympathy's failure to bridge the emotional and socioeconomic distance between individuals, thereby highlighting sympathy's limitations as a moral instrument. I argue that by using Yorick's repeated acts of sympathy to explore the problems of sentimentalism, Sterne both draws from and innovates the tradition of employing imaginary voyages to engage in philosophical inquiries.

명재 윤증의 율곡성리학의 수용과 변전(變轉) (A Study on Acceptance and Modification in Yulgok Neo-Confucianism by Myungjae Yoon Jeung)

  • 이영자
    • 한국철학논집
    • /
    • 제42호
    • /
    • pp.39-70
    • /
    • 2014
  • 명재 윤증의 성리학은 율곡의 성리학을 그대로 계승하거나 변형하는 형태로 전개된다. 본고에서는 이를 율곡성리학의 수용과 변전으로 나누어 고찰하였다. 율곡성리학의 수용에서는 율곡성리학의 특징인 '이기지묘(理氣之妙)', '이통기국(理通氣局)', '기발이승일도(氣發理乘一途)'의 측면에서 명재가 이러한 논리를 철저히 계승하고 있음을 밝히었다. 하지만 명재는 율곡성리학을 자신만의 독창적인 설법을 제시하며, 율곡의 학설을 변전 계승하고 있다. 첫째, 명재는 리의 주재성을 강조한다. 이것은 '이용사(理用事)'라는 용어를 통해 도심, 인심, 인욕을 세 단계로 이해하는 데서 분명히 드러난다. 둘째, 명재의 격물치지설(格物致知說)은 주자나 율곡의 격물치지의 큰 틀 안에서 말하고는 있지만, 그 논법에 있어서는 양명학적 요소를 엿볼 수 있다. 셋째, 명재는 도심의 '기발'이나 인심의 '기발', '기용사'를 모두 부정적인 의미로 보지 않는다는 점에서 특징적이다. 그것은 그가 리의 주재성을 고려하여 '기용사(氣用事)'를 이해하기 때문으로 보인다. 결국 명재는 기호유학자로서 율곡의 '기발이승일도'와 '이기지묘'적 입장에서 성리설을 더욱 정합화하고자 하였던 의도로 율곡성리학을 변전하여 계승 발전시키고 있다고 할 수 있다. 그것은 그가 사변적인 성리논변 자체를 꺼리고, 실심에 기반하여 실공을 추구하고자 한 인생철학과, 선현들의 학설은 이미 풍부하므로 그 책들을 읽고 진지를 실천할 일이지, 그와 관계없이 저술에 힘쓰는 것은 무실의 학문이 아니라고 말했던 학문관과 일치한다. 다만 그 성향이 율곡학파 내에서도 '리'의 주재성을 가장 많이 강조한 학자군으로 분류되면서, 기호 소론이라는 새로운 학맥을 형성하게 되었다. 이것이 기호성리학에서 명재성리학이 갖는 가장 중요한 의의이다.

Aesthetic Consciousness and Literary Logic in the Jamesian Transatlantic Perspective: Towards a Dialectic of "a big Anglo Saxon total"

  • Kim, Choon-hee
    • 영어영문학
    • /
    • 제57권3호
    • /
    • pp.367-389
    • /
    • 2011
  • The aesthetic attitude, in general or in particular, represented in matters of taste through aesthetic ideas and value judgments postulates a certain literary logic. And this literary logic reveals itself a sense of morality, philosophy, or moral aesthetic consciousness through the moments of act and thought demonstrated in the characters invented in literary works. Henry James, among many others, offers a very special cultural paradigm for transnational argument because of his diverse ways of shaping transatlantic relations in terms of aesthetic consciousness. And this international paradigm produced varied expressions referring to Henry James as "an American expatriate," "an Anglicized American artist," "a Europeanized aesthete," "a cosmopolitan intelligence," "a bohemian cosmopolitan" to designate his literary career and its characteristics shaped in Europe. Such expressions resonate with Transatlantic Sketches, James's first collection on travel and cultures in 1875 which heralded his long "expatriation" in terms of self-distantiation. James's temperament of mind, far from being always identified with shared values within an ideological framework, never avoided friction with fixed ideas but rather absorbed it fully for another friction which intervenes in his house of fiction. My question arises here regarding his cultural belonging or dislocation: where is the place of his mind or what could be his ultimate destination? In this essay, I'd like to define a place or rather the place of James's literary mind by proving a certain "sympathetic justice" for his literary logic. For this purpose, I'll try to examine: how James used transatlantic perspective, a spatio-temporal assessment to formulate his moral aesthetic consciousness; and how the aesthetic framework functions in assessing his literary logic of aesthetic consciousness. To start with the first argument, I'll analyze some essential aspects of aesthetic attitude of his characters to postulate a persona capable of theorizing James's aestheticism conditioned by the transatlantic context. And for the second argument, I'll examine how the persona functions in formulating a proper cultural stance of James's aesthetic consciousness in transatlantic perspective to illuminate the way of how Jamesian individuality reflects the American mind. This process of theorizing a place of James's own will lead, I hope, to our discovering James's ultimate destination on the assumption that it'll prove or create a certain "sympathetic justice" for his humanist aestheticism, a Jamesian absolute morality.

율곡철학(栗谷哲學)에 있어서 '마음'의 문제 (The Issue of Mind in Youlgok's Philosophy)

  • 이상익
    • 한국철학논집
    • /
    • 제25호
    • /
    • pp.167-196
    • /
    • 2009
  • 율곡의 마음에 대한 논의는 '심성정의일로설(心性情意一路說)'과 '기발이승일도설(氣發理乘一途說)'로 대변된다. 심성정의일로설(心性情意一路說)은 두 의미를 지닌다. 첫째, 마음과 본성 감정 의지는 각각 별도의 존재가 아니라, 하나의 마음에 속하는 여러 차원의 양상들이라는 것이다. 둘째, '인심과 도심, 본연지성과 기질지성, 사단과 칠정' 등을 각각 이원적으로 대립시키지 않고 일원적으로 통합시켰다는 것이다. 기발이승일도설(氣發理乘一途說)은 이(理)의 규범성과 기(氣)의 능동성이라는 관점에서 마음과 본성 감정의 관계를 설명한 것이다. 율곡은 기(氣)(마음)는 '발(發)하는 작용의 주체'이고, 이(理)(성(性))는 '마음의 작용을 통해 발현되는 내용'이라 하였다. 이렇게 마음의 작용을 통해 본성이 발한 결과를 감정이라 한다. 율곡의 '이승(理乘)'은 '기(氣)를 주재한다(기(氣)의 표준이 된다)'는 의미와 함께 '기(氣)에 의해 실현된다'는 의미를 지닌다. 요컨대 마음은 본성을 실현하는 주체이지만, 또한 마음의 작용은 본성에 의해 규제되고 있다는 것이다. 이처럼 이(理)(본성)의 규범성과 기(氣)(마음)의 능동성을 동시에 주목하는 것이 율곡철학의 특징이었다.

후천세계가 지향하는 인간상 탐구- 정역의 지인(至人) 중심으로 - (Consideration on Human in World of Post-Heaven: Focusing on perfect man of Right I Ching)

  • 박혜순
    • 대순사상논총
    • /
    • 제25_2집
    • /
    • pp.103-136
    • /
    • 2015
  • The theory of post-heaven provided Korea's many emerging national religions with spiritual ground. The I Ching originated in China emphasizes the principles of change or static aspects of world, while Right I Ching, which Il-Bu Kim suggested, underlines dynamic aspects of world. Il-Bu Kim is perceived to open a new stage in the history of philosophy of I Ching in this regard. His most remarkable contribution is the view of Great Opening Era of Post-Heaven, according to which the clock of cosmos shows the era of great change from Pre-Heaven to Post-Heaven and in the world of Post-Heaven everything will take its proper place. As to human society, Il-Bu Kim foresaw the change from disharmony to harmony, imbalance to balance and era of xiaoren to that of junzi. The advent of such a new world, however, asks human's moral revolution as a prerequisite. In the tradition of East Asian thought, human is the center of the Samjae, Heaven-Earth-Human and the only being which could participate in the growth of Heaven and Earth. Without the change of human mind, however, human can neither participate in the growth of Heaven and Earth nor expect the right change of Heaven and Earth. Even though the world of nature changes according to the principle of cosmic harmony, as the Right I Ching predicts, the real change of Heaven and Earth can be achieved only with moral change of human. The human in the Right I Ching is a free man who sticks to nothing and communicates with cosmos with empty mind. This is the very image of perfect man(至人). The perfect man in the Right I Ching is the main agent of everything, that's to say, the main agent of the great opening to Post-Heaven Era. This is the reason why most leaders of Koran emerging religions concentrate on the change of human. In this regard, Jeung-San Kang encouraged people to become the perfect man through the purification of mind and body and the great opening of inner man, depending on the metaphysical principle of the Right I Ching. Cheok and Resolution of grievances for the mutual beneficence of all life are what he suggested as a method of the great opening of inner man. Such a view is based on the thought that the accumulated sinful behaviors are obstacles to cosmic change and the time of mutual beneficience opens with the removal of the obstacles. If such religious practices are so effective, as Jeung-San Kang says, that future world could consist of perfect men who have achived the great opening of inner man, moral change, and change of consciousness, we could expect that the activities of xiaoren will be shrinked and junzi will be welcomed, as the Right I Ching predicts.