• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.83-88
• /
• 2006

Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of arthroscopic decompression and miniopen repair that was related with large and massive sized full thickness rotator cuff tear and assess clinical result. Materials and Methods: Twenthy-nine cases of miniopen repaired full thickness tear of rotator cuffs that arthroscopically decompressed were studied. From October 1998 to December 2004 we have analysed 29 repairs of large and massive sized FTRCT, the average age 44 ($32{\sim}71$) years old, mean follow-up was 34 ($12{\sim}84$) months. We analyzed the results statistically by paired t-test. Results: Postoperative VAS of pain improved average 7.0 to 1.7, UCLA score improved 13.7 to 31.9, ADL improved 11.3 to 25.3 respectively (all, P=0.000). Twenty five cases(82.8%) of the patients showed excellent & good results at the final follow-up. The satisfied rate was 26 cases(89.7%). Conclusions: Arthroscopic decompression and miniopen repair in large and massive sized full thickness rotator cuff tears are effective surgical methods.

• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 2002.10a
• /
• pp.87-97
• /
• 2002

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.73-80
• /
• 2004

Purpose: To compare the results of a miniopen repair with those of complete arthroscopic repair in medium and large sized full thickness rotator cuff tears. Materials and Methods: The thirty four(34) patients with medium and large sized complete rotator cuff tear were observed, Group I (complete arthroscopic repair) were 13 cases and group II (miniopen repair) were 21 cases. The tear sizes are from 1cm to 5cm. The average follow up periods are 24(range;12$\~$36) and 28(range; 12$\~$36) months. Subjective pain was evaluated with VAS (visual analogue scale) in rest state. ADL (Activity of Daily Living) and UCLA scoring system were used to evaluate clinical results. Results: At last follow-up periods, pain and functional scores were improved but they had not been shown statistical significance (p>0.05). In the group I and group II, there are no significant difference in VAS, ADL; UCLA score, satisfaction (p>0.05). Conclusions: In medium and large sized full thickness rotator cuff tears, there are no significant clinical results between the arthroscopic and miniopen group.

• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 1998.03a
• /
• pp.52-52
• /
• 1998

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.81-86
• /
• 2004

Objectives: To assess the functional outcome of Bankart repair and rotator cuff repair using miniopen technique in patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation(8 cases) with rotator cuff tears and Bankart lesion of over 40 years. Materials and Methods: From May 1991 to January 2002, twenty two patients were available to participate in the study. Mean age was 52 years old(41-67), Follow-up evaluations averaged 50.5months(10-147). Results: The patients(22 cases) were divided into two groups. Group 1: with recurrent shoulder dislocation(8 cases) with rotator cuff tears and Bankart lesion in patients over 40 years old. Group 2: without Bankart lesion(14 cases). In Group 1, mean average of forward flexion and abduction improved from 122 degrees to 154 degrees at the final follow-up and from 115 degrees to 161 degrees respectively. In terms of University of Pennsylvania patient self-assessment of pain score and VAS, scores improved from 11.0 to 5.5 and from 5.4 to 2.5 respectively. In terms of UCLA score & Constant score, scores also improved from 20.2 to 29.6 and from 48.6 to 69.0 respectively. Functional outcome of Group 1: two patients with excellent, four patients with good, and two patients with fair. Functional outcome of Group 2: two patients with excellent, six patients with good, five patients with fair, and one patient with poor. But they had no statistical significance between the two groups. All cases were improved shoulder pain at the final follow up. And six patients were satisfied with the outcome of shoulder function. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of Bankart repair and rotator cuff repair using miniopen technique in patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation(8 cases) with tears of rotator cuff and Bankart lesion older than 40 years. We recommend Bankart repair and rotator cuff repair at the same time.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.34-39
• /
• 2005

Partial thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) are now a well-established clinical entity, yrt there is no consensus in regards to surgical management. Recommended treatment varies widely from simple debridement of the torn tendon to subacromial decompression to excision of the degenerative tendon and repair. Surgery may be performed using an open, arthroscopically assisted (miniopen), or entirely arthroscopic procedure. The advantages and disadvantages of open and arthroscopic procedures may lie in the balance between precision and morbidity. Visualization of both the articular and bursal surfaces is mandatory to determine the level of rotator cuff disease and formulate a treatment strategy. Because these tear often are secondary finding, recognition of the primary pathology is critical. Treatment of the primary problem usually remedies the partial tear. However, when there is significant PTRCT, an arthroscopic or open repair of the diseased tendon will give the most consistent results.