• 제목/요약/키워드: Mini Hydro Cyclone Separator

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.017초

3D 프린팅을 적용한 미니 하이드로 싸이클론 분리기의 질량유량을 통한 분리효율 해석 및 평가 (Analysis and Evaluation of Separation Efficiency on Mass Flow of Mini Hydro Cyclone Separator Manufactured by 3D Printing)

  • 이형욱;이여울;이명원;권제영;강명창
    • 한국기계가공학회지
    • /
    • 제20권7호
    • /
    • pp.89-96
    • /
    • 2021
  • In this study, a mini hydro cyclone was designed and manufactured to achieve an inlet flow rate of 2 L/min in the experiment, which was conducted using alumina powder with a specific gravity of 3.97. This hydro cyclone was studied for using in steam and water analysis system (SWAS) of thermal power plant and was manufactured by 3D printing. Numerical analysis was performed with Solidworks Flow Simulation, utilizing the reynolds stress method (RSM) of fluid multiphase flow analysis models. Experimental and numerical analysis were performed under the three conditions of inlet velocity 2.0, 4.0, and 6.0 m/s. The separation efficiency was over 80% at all inlet velocity conditions. At the inlet velocity 4m/s, the separation efficiency was the best, and it was confirmed that the efficiency was more than 90%.

미니 하이드로 사이클론 분리기의 이중배열을 통한 성능특성 평가 (Evaluation of Performance Characteristics by Dual Arrangement of Mini-hydrocyclone Separators)

  • 권제영;김승경;홍준규;이형욱;강명창
    • 한국기계가공학회지
    • /
    • 제20권11호
    • /
    • pp.17-23
    • /
    • 2021
  • A cyclone is a dust-separating mechanism that works on the principle of centrifugal force. The performance of a cyclone is evaluated using pressure loss and collection efficiency. A multi-cyclone arrangement is used to improve the collection efficiency within a limited area. In this study, experiments and numerical analyses were conducted on a dual arrangement of mini-hydrocyclone separators, which was fabricated using 3D printing. The experiment was performed at an inlet flow rate of 0.7 m/s, and alumina powder with a particle size of 0.5, 15, and 50 ㎛. ANSYS FLUENT, was used for the numerical analysis. The reliability of the numerical analysis was verified through a comparison with the experimental results. The errors in the experiment and numerical analysis were confirmed to be 2% at the outlet flow rate.