• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.172-177
• /
• 1996

We performed a study of epidural patient controlled analgesia of meperidine with or without 0.08% bupivacaine for 48 hours after Cesarean section. 51 parturients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups : 1) epidural 0.2% meperidine group(n:24) and 2) epidural combined group with 0.2% meperidine and 0.08% bupivacaine(n:27). All parturients used patient controlled analgesia with loading dose, 2 ml/hour continuous infusion, 1 ml bolus infusion and lockout time, 8 minutes. visual analog scales after loading doses were not significantly different in either groups. The total quantity of meperidine consumption and hourly consumption were significantly lower in the combined group than meperidine group(P<0.05). The cumulative amount of meperidine consumption were also significantly lower in the combined group than meperidine group at 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours. In combined group the hourly consumption of meperidien from 3 hours to 12 hours after loading dose was significantly lower than those of meperidine group. Above 90% of parturients were satisfied in both groups. Side effects were: numbness (2), thigh weakness (1), nausea (1), headache (1) and back pain (2) in epidural meperidine group. There were no case needed specific treatment in both groups. We conclude that analgesic effects were similar in both groups, however the amount of meperidine consumption was less for meperiding group than combined group.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.166-171
• /
• 1996

The purpose of this study is to compare the postoperative analgesic effect of morphine and meperidine, employing intravenous patient controlled analgesia after cesarean section. Among fifty nine parturients undergoing cesarean section with general anesthesia, 32 were administered morphine designated as 'morphine group', and 27 parturient administered meperidine as 'meperidine' group, during 48 hours after commencement of PCA. Doses administered, based on potency for this setting, were equivalent to 1 mg morphine or 10 mg meperidine. Loading dose was administered when parturient first complained of pain after cesarean section. This was followed with bolus dose, 1 mg for morphine group and 10 mg for meperidine group, with a lockout interval of 8 minutes between doses wherever parturient requested additional analgesia. Visual analog scale(VAS) pain scores during rest were significantly lower at only 1 and 2 hour for the meperidine group, than morphine group. Loading dose and cumulative dose at 1, 2 and 3 hours were significantly lower for meperidine group than the morphine group. There were no significant difference in total dose and hourly dose for 48 hours and cumulative dose at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours between both groups. More than 90% of the parturients from both groups were satisfied with the analgesic effects of pain relief. Morphine group experienced side effects such as: pruritus, sedation and dizziness. Meperidine group had sedation, dizziness, nausea and local irritation. Neither group required any specific treatment for any of the above side effects. We conclude that meperidine had greater analgesic effect at early stage of post-operative period.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.192-196
• /
• 2006

Background: Epidural opioids are commonly used for postoperative analgesia. However, the side effects of epidural opioids include respiratory depression, sedation, pruritus, nausea, vomiting and urinary retention. Meperidine, due to its intermediate lipid solubility and local anesthetic properties, permits postoperative analgesia. The aim of this study was to compare meperidine alone to meperidine coupled with bupivacaine, and to determine the effects of epidural meperidine without bupivacaine, when used for epidural analgesia following hepatectomy abdominal surgery. Methods: Patients received thoracic epidural analgesia with meperidine alone (3.5 mg/ml in saline) or with additional bupivacaine (0.15%) for 2 days after surgery. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) pain score 2 days after the operation, with the incidence and dose supplementation also evaluated. Postoperative side effects were assessed using a 3 grade system. Results: No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of age and weight, or in the pain scores, side effects, incidence and dose supplementation. Conclusions: 3.5 mg/ml epidural meperidine at a dose of 2 ml/hr provides effective postoperative analgesia.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.257-265
• /
• 1995

Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) has been widely used for postoperative pain relief. Meperidine is useful for PCA and has efficient analgesia, rapid onset, and low incidence of adverse effect. To compare the analgesic effect, total dose and hourly dose, side effect and neonatal status of breast feeding with meperidine via intravenous or epidural PCA for 48 hours after Cesarean Section, 40 parturient women undergoing elective Cesarean Section were randomly divided into two groups. Each respective group of 20 parturient women received meperidine via one of the intravenous PCA after general anesthesia with enflurane (IVPCA group) and the epidural PCA after general anesthesia with enflurane (IVPCA group) and the epidural PCA after epidural block with 2% lidocaine 20ml combined with general anesthesia with only $N_2O$ and $O_2$ (EpiPCA group) when they first complained of pain in recovery room. Following the administration of analgesic initial dose, parturient women of IVPCA group were allowed intravenous meperidine 10 mg every 8 minutes when they felt pain. The EpiPCA group received additional bolus dose of meperidine 2 mg and bupivacaine 0.7 mg were administered every 8 minutes as requested the patients with hourly continuous infusion of meperidine 4 mg and bupivacaine 1.4 mg. Data was collected during the 48 hours observation period including visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, total meperidine dose, hourly dose during 48 hours and each time interval, incidence of adverse effect, satisfaction, and neonatal status with breast feeding. VAS pain scores of analgesic effect in EpiPCA group was significantly lower than in IVPCA group at 2 hours after the initial pain after Cesarean Section. Total dose and hourly dose of meperidine significantly reduced in EpiPCA group. Hourly dose of meperidine at each time interval significantly reduced during first 6 hours and from 12 hours to 24 hours in EpiPCA group. The side effects in IVPCA group were mainly sedation, nausea, and local irritation of skin. And EpiPCA group experienced numbness and itching. The degree of satisfaction of parturient women was 88.2 % in IVPCA group and 85.7 % in EpiPCA group. We did not observe any sedation, abnormal behavior, or seizure like activity in any neonates of breast feeding. From the above results we conclude that epidural PCA was more efficiently analgesic, less sedative, and consumptional, and safer for neonate than intravenous PCA, and could be an alternative method to intravenous PCA.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.262-269
• /
• 2005

본 연구의 목적은 소아 환자의 치과 진료를 위한 진정요법 시 chloral hydrate와 hydroxyzine의 경구 투여와 midazolam과 meperidine의 경구 투여간의 임상적인 진정효과 및 합병증 발생 여부를 비교하는 것이다. 삼성서울병원 소아치과를 내원한 환아 중 ASA I 또는 II에 해당하는 4세 미만의 아동 15명을 대상으로 하여 한 달여 간격으로 두 차례에 걸친 진정요법을 시행하였다. 2회의 진정요법 중 1회는 chloral hydrate (60mg/kg)/hydroxyzine(25mg)을 경구 투여하고 나머지 1회는 midazolam(1mg/kg)/meperidine(1mg/kg)을 경구 투여하였으며 투여 순서는 무작위로 정하였다. 두 차례 모두 $N_2O-O_2$ 흡입진정을 병용하였다. 각 치료과정에 따른 진정효과는 Houpt Scale(수면, 움직임, 울음, 전반적인 행동 지수)로 측정하였고 pulse oximeter를 이용하여 저산소증의 유무를 비교, 평가하고 약물 투여 후 구토의 여부를 함께 평가하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. Chloral hydrate와 hydroxyzine을 경구 투여한 군이 midazolam과 meperidine을 경구 투여한 군보다 전반적인 행동 지수에서 통계학적으로 유의하게 우수한 결과를 보였으며 어느 군에서도 저산소증은 보이지 않았다. 본 연구에서는 chloral hydrate와 hydroxyzine의 경구 투여가 midazolam과 meperidine의 경구 투여보다 우수한 진정효과를 보이는 것으로 판단된다.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.379-386
• /
• 2013

Background: Shivering related to spinal anesthesia may interfere with monitoring and is uncomfortable. The aim of the present study was to investigate low-dose intrathecal meperidine for the prevention of shivering after induction of spinal anesthesia in parturients with cesarean section. Methods: This was a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial including 100 parturients, of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II, scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia who were randomly assigned to a meperidine (0.2 mg/kg) plus hyperbaric lidocaine (5%, 75 mg, n = 50; group M) group or a placebo plus hyperbaric lidocaine (5%, 75 mg, n = 50; group L) group. Demographic and surgical data, adverse events, and the mean intensity for each parturient were assessed during the entire study period by a blinded observer. Results: There were no significant differences between the two study groups regarding the demographic and surgical data (P > 0.05). The incidence of shivering during the entire study period significantly decreased in the group of parturients who received intrathecal meperidine (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in nausea and vomiting between the two groups. Conclusions: Low-dose intrathecal meperidine (10 mg) is safe and effective in reducing the incidence and severity of shivering associated with spinal anesthesia in parturients with cesarean section.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.374-379
• /
• 1996

Background: Recently, improvements in drug administration technology have intensified interest in the treatment of postoperative pain. this has resulted in increased use of continuous intravenous infusion of opioid and epidural opioid as alternative to traditional intramuscular administration of opioid. The goal of this study, therefore, was to document the effects of pain control and side effects following continuous intravenous infusion of morphine or meperidine and intramuscular meperidine following cesarean section. Methods: The vital signs, pain score, oxygen saturation and side effects were compared in 150 patients receiving continuous intravenous infusion of morphine, 30 ${\mu}g/kg/hr$ (n=50, group 1); continuous intravenous infusion of meperidine, 150 ${\mu}g/kg/hr$ (n=50, group 2); or intramuscular meperidine, 50mg/every 6hrs (n=50, group 3). Results: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) was significantly decreased after 30 minutes of administration in all three groups and was significantly lower at 1 hour, but higher at 6 hours in group 3 than two other groups. Severe desaturation episode, defined as $SpO_2$<90%, occurred in the group 3(0.2%). Moderate desaturation episodes, defined as $SpO_2$ 91~95%, occurred more in group 3 than in group 1 and 2 (17.4% vs. 10.4%, 8.2%). The incidence of side effects were similar among three groups. Conclusion: The continuous infusion of opioid was more effective and safe method of postoperative pain control than traditional intramuscular injection.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.49-54
• /
• 1993

The use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia is an effective and increasingly used means of providing postoperative pain relief. Recently a non-electric, disposable and portable infusor, the Baxter $Infusor^{(R)}$, has developed. This delivers not only a continuous drug infusion but can also deliver extradoses of medication on demand. The present study examined the benefits of two kinds of analgesics for pain management in 28 patients undergoing gynecological surgery. One group, 14 patients, received i.v. meperidine 0.5 mg/kg as loading dose in the recovery room and PCA with meperidine 3 mg/kg/day for 3 days only(M group). In the other group, 14 patients, also received i.v. meperidine 0.5 mg/kg as loading dose in the recovery room and PCA meperidine 3 mg/kg/day for 3 days and droperidol 5 mg(MD group). The PCA device used was the Baxter $Infusor^{(R)}$. This unit was fitted with patient control module which had a flow rate 0.5 ml/hr and the lockout time was 15 min. Resulting from the study, the MD patients in the first and second days post-operatively, reported less pain compared with the M group. VAPS(Visual Analogue Pain Scales) values were $3.52{\pm}l.61$ vs. $2.22{\pm}0.69$, $2.38{\pm}1.12$ vs. $1.45{\pm}0.48$ and $1.93{\pm}1.65$ vs. $0.98{\pm}0.36$, respectively pertaining to M and MD groups. In conclusion, the MD group with meperidine and droperidol(mixed regimen) provided more effective postoperative analgesia than M group(meperidine only).

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.213-220
• /
• 1992

Morphine, meperidine 및 pentazocine을 가토의 좌골신경에 주입한 후 마약제의 신경차단 유무와 약제 주입 후 4시간, 24시간 및 1주에 좌골 신경을 절취하여 신경조직학적 변화를 관찰하였다. 좌골신경에 약제를 주입한 후 신경자극에 의한 반응과 뒷다리 운동을 관찰한 결과, morphine군은 신경차단 효과가 없었고 meperidine군과 pentazocine군은 약제주입 5분 후부터 근육이완이 시작되어 10분 후부터 근육수축이 나타나지 않았으며 뒷다리에 마비증상은 약제주입 60분 후부터 부분적으로 회복되기 시작하여 90분 후에는 정상으로 회복되는 양상의 신경차단 효과가 있었다. 광학 현미경적 소견으로는 모두 4시간부터 1주까지의 표본에 특기할만한 변화가 없었으며, 전자 현미경적 소견에서 morphine군은 1주 후 소견에서 유수신경섬유와 무수신경섬유에 경미한 수포양을 보였다. Meperidine군은 4시간 후 소견으로 유수신경섬유의 축삭돌기에 경미한 수포양이 있었고 무수신경의 마이엘린화되는 소견이 있었으며, 24시간 후 유수신경섬유에 경미한 수포양이 있었고 무수신경섬유가 정상으로 되었으며 1주 후 특기할 만한 변화가 없었다. Pentazocine군은 약제주입 4시간 후 유수신경섬유에 경미한 수포양을 보였으며 24시간 후 유수신경 섬유와 무수신경섬유에 중등도의 수포양이 나타났으며 1주 후 경미한 수포양을 나타내었다. 주입된 약제중 morphine이 가장 수포양이 적었으며 pentazocine이 심한 변화를 나타내었고, 전단계 쥐 실험에서 나타났던 meperidine주입 1주 후의 심한 신경조직 손상은 본 실험에서 나타나지 않았다.

• 대한약리학회지
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.23-30
• /
• 1989

함께 투여되는 마약성진통제에 따라 효능제 또는 길항제(mixed agonist-antagonist)로 작용하는 buprenorphine을 사용하여 개구리 좌골신경에 존재하는 아편수용체의 성질을 검토하였다. 실험은 sucrose-gap apparatus를 사용하여 활동전압에 대한 영향을 관찰하였으며 약물의 상호작용을 검토하고자 meperidine 또는 naloxone을 사용하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1) Buprenorphine은 현저하게 개구리 좌골신경의 활동전압을 저하시켰다. 2) 두 개의 최고작용농도를 보였는데 저농도에서는 $10^{-8}\;M$, 또 고농도에서는 $10^{-4}\;M$에서 현저하게 작용을 나타내었다. 3) Buprenorphine은 meperidine의 활동전압 저하작용을 의의있게 억제하였다. 4) Naloxone에 의하여 Buprenorphine의 저하 작용이 억제되었다. 위의 실험결과로 Buprenorphine은 순수 마약성진통제의 작용을 억제하여 차단제로 작용하는 한편 또한 효능제로 활동전압을 의의있게 억제하였다. 이로써 개구리 좌골신경에 있는 아편수용체는 세포막에 또는 세포막 주위에서 $Na^+-Channel$이 활성화되는 데 중요한 역할을 하는 것으로 간주되며 이 수용체는 또한 Naloxone에 매우 민감한 반응을 나타낸다.