• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2014.01a
• /
• pp.19-21
• /
• 2014

본 논문에서는 기존의 산조가야금의 음을 합성하여 아두이노(Arduino)와 DSP(Digital Signal Processor)를 이용한 물리적 모델링 기반의 현 없는 산조 가야금을 구현한다. 아두이노는 저렴한 가격에 마이크로컨트롤러를 효율적으로 제어하며, DSP는 높은 분해능과 빠른 A/D변환 기능을 지원하여 복잡한 음 합성 연산의 빠른 처리를 만족시킨다. 또한 기존 가야금의 복잡한 연주법을 초보자도 쉽게 다루기 위해 가야금의 현을 대신해 터치 패널을 사용한다. 본 논문에서는 기본적인 I/O동작은 아두이노 MEGA 2560보드를, 음 합성의 복잡한 연산을 위해 CCSv5(Code Composer Studio) 툴과 DSP칩을 내장한 DSK5510 보드를 이용하여 기능을 검증한다. 모의실험 결과 현 없는 가야금의 합성음은 기존의 음과 매우 유사하였으며, 초보자도 쉽게 제어하고 연주가 가능한 환경을 구현하였다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.13 no.7
• /
• pp.417-431
• /
• 2013

During the development process of mega-project, individual buildings including skyscrapers are built following the master plan. It is not a difficult thing to see the gap of standpoint between the urban planners and architects on the project. This study aims to analyze the difference between architect and urban planner's point of view in evaluating international design competition works which the internationally distinguished honorable design companies(SOM, Jerde Partnership, Studio Daniel Libeskind, Foster+Partners and Asymptote Architecture) submitted as the ideas of Yongsan International Business District Design. Furthermore, we made an attempt to quantify the weight of each factors of urban design by each group. Architect and urban planner's viewpoint were revealed with seven architects and seven urban planners evaluating the international design competition works through AHP(Analytical Hierarchy Process). AHP structure was made of two step hierarchy in terms of Master Plan and Landmark Tower. Eight evaluation criteria were set up such as the concept, land use, transportation, feasibility of Master Plan and the concept, location, functional efficiency and aesthetic beauty of Landmark Tower. Results show that Architect have different point of view from that of urban planner. While the architect's weight of evaluation criteria is on the Landmark Tower(0.505), urban planner's weight is on Master Plan(0.642). Feasibility, the location of Landmark Tower and land-use are very important evaluation criteria to architect and urban planner in common. Functional efficiency of Landmark Tower is in architect's favour and transportation is in urban planner.