• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.71-75
• /
• 2013

Root tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus can occur from trauma or chronic degeneration, leading to meniscus extrusion, articular cartilage loss, osteophyte formation, and medial joint space narrowing. It is common on middle age with or without minor trauma. We experienced a case of medial meniscus posterior horn root tear in 13 years old boy during baseball game. We performed 1 direct suture anchor repair for medial meniscus posterior horn root tear in adolescent and report clinical result.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.11 no.1
• /
• pp.37-43
• /
• 2012

Purpose: This study is to evaluate the clinical results of pull-out suture for root tear of posterior horn of medial meniscus. Materials and Methods: Between March 2006 and February 2011, We studied 40 cases with the root tear of posterior horn of medial meniscus which follow up more than 1 years. Mean age was 49.5 years old. We excluded osteoarthritis or varus deformity patients more than 5 degrees. pull-out suture was performed to the patients with grade 0-2 of Kellgren and Lawrence classification. According to Outerbridge classification, evaluation of cartilage damage was performed during arthroscopy. Evaluation of clinical result was used the Lysholm score. Results: The mean pre-operation Lysholm score was 63.9 and post-operation score was 86.3. The complete failure rate was 3 of 40 cases (7.5%). Twenty of 40 cases (50%) showed cartilage lesions in weight bearing portion of medial femoral condyle which were 12 cases in grade 1, 5 cases in grade 2 and 3 cases in grade 3 according to the Outerbridge classification. Conclusion: In the treatment of pull-out suture for root tear of posterior horn of medial meniscus, exclusion of more than moderate arthritis or varus deformity is very importment. Pull-out suture seems to be a useful treatment of the root tear of posterior horn of medial meniscus in mild osteoarthritis or varus deformity of middle ages.

• Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
• /
• v.55 no.5
• /
• pp.450-455
• /
• 2020

Posterior root tear of the medial meniscus are well known. Although very rare, there are reports of anterior root tears of the medial meniscus but no reports on traumatic bony avulsion of the anterior medial meniscus root. This paper reports a case of an isolated bony avulsion of the anterior medial meniscus root, which was successfully repaired arthroscopically.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.66-71
• /
• 2012

The posterior root of medial meniscus maintains normal meniscal function by circumferential hoop tension and prevents extrusion of meniscus and progression of osteoarthritis. A complete tear of posterior root of medial meniscus leads to loss of hoop tension, it is important to repair it and preserve the function of the medial meniscus. Recently, a variety of arthroscopic assisted reduction and repair techniques have been used. We create an arthroscopic all-inside suture technique using a 18 gauge spinal needle and suture anchor that is easier and more convenient compared with the previous techniques. So we report this technique with a review of current literatures.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.6-10
• /
• 2013

Purpose: This study intends to verify the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for estimate recovery after arthroscopic pull-out repair at root tears of medial meniscus. Materials and Methods: We performed 17 patients who examined MRI and arthroscopy among patients who had received repair of medial meniscus from November, 2007 to June, 2011. To determine restoration meniscus, we performed arthroscopy and MRI. Results: Lysholm knee scores before and after operation were average 56.4 and 79.0 and visual analogue scale (VAS) score was improved from 8 points to 3 points. From secondary look arthroscopy performed after operation, 17 cases showed stabilization after regeneration. However, In MRI, cleft sign implying root tears of medial meniscus was observed in all cases before and after operation, ghost sign was observed in 10 cases and 9 cases respectively, radial linear defect was showed 17 cases and 15 cases respectively. Conclusion: It was not useful that MRI after medial meniscus repair in non-anatomical site, to consider restoration of medial meniscus. To evaluate for recovery medial meniscus after repair more exactly, secondary arthroscopy would be required.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.114-120
• /
• 2012

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the usefulness and the stability of the superficial medial collateral ligament (MCL) release in posterior medial meniscus root repair. Materials and Methods: We compared 20 patients who underwent posterior medial meniscus root repair with superficial MCL preserved (PM) and 32 patients who underwent posterior medial meniscus root repair combined with superficial MCL release (RM) from April 2006 to September 2010. We excluded the patients combined with other surgery. To evaluate the postoperative valgus instability in RM group, we examined direct tenderness on MCL insertion, the subjective feeling of instability and valgus stress test at 3 months and 1 year follow-up. We compared the tourniquet time between PM group and RM group, and the clinical results were assessed by Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) for the usefulness. Results: All patients had no clinically significant complication related to the superficial MCL release. Three months and 1 year follow-up, there were no positive tenderness test, no subjective symptoms and no significant increase of valgus instability although 5 patients examined grade I valgus instability. The mean tourniquet time was $41.3{\pm}12.7$ minutes in RM group and $53.5{\pm}13.6$ minutes in PM group. There was a significant difference in the tourniquet time between the two groups (P<0.05). Average Lysholm score was $56.8{\pm}5.5$ (range, 44-70) preoperatively and $85.1{\pm}5.8$ (range, 77-94) postoperatively in PM group, and was $56.2{\pm}5.4$ (range, 45-67) preoperatively and $87.4{\pm}3.9$ (range, 82-95) postoperatively in RM group (P<0.001). No significant difference of Lysholm score was found in both groups (P<0.05). Average IKDC scores was $42.6{\pm}3.9$ (range, 30-53) preoperatively and $77.2{\pm}6.3$ (range, 68-92) postoperatively in PM group, and was $42.7{\pm}5.7$ (range, 30-53) preoperatively and $89.6{\pm}2.9$ (range, 84-95) postoperatively in RM group (P<0.05). There was also no significant difference of IKDC score in both groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: The superficial MCL release in posterior medial meniscus root repair is useful to gain a wide surgical field and reduces the tourniquet time and does not lead to postoperative valgus instability. It can be considered clinically useful and safe procedure in medial meniscus posterior root repair.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.153-159
• /
• 2012

Purpose: This study aims at evaluating our results with a 5-year follow up of arthroscopic pull-out suture repair of posterior root tear of the medial meniscus. Materials and Methods: This study enrolled 30 cases who underwent a arthroscopic pull-out suture repair to treat the posterior root tear of the medial meniscus from January 2001 to May 2005 and followed up at least 5 years. The average follow-up period was 76 months (range, 60-90 months). Clinical results by use of the Lysholm knee score and radiographic grade by use of the Kellgren-Lawrence classification were evaluated and second-look arthroscopy was done in all cases. The clinical results were compared with trauma history, obesity, varus deformity and time to operation. Results: At the last follow up, the Lysholm knee score improved from 55 points to 86 points. For the radiological results, 23 cases displayed maintenance or improvement of the medial joint space on the follow up X-ray, but 7 cases displayed decrease of the medial joint space, and 1 case was lately performed total knee replacement due to progressive osteoarthritic change. Conclusion: Arthroscopic pull-out suture repair has a good result at 27 cases (90%) in minimum 5 years follow-up. The clinical improvement was significantly reduced in more severe varus angle.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.128-133
• /
• 2007

Purpose: To examine the clinical results after arthroscopic meniscectomy of radial tear of medial meniscus. Materials and Methods: We studied 45 cases with the radial tear of medial meniscus which follow up more than 2 years(range 2 to 7 years). Arthroscopic surgery was performed to the patients with grade 0-2 according to the Kellgren and Lawrence classification. Evaluation of cartilage damage was performed on surgical photos according to Outerbridge classification. Evaluation of clinical result was used the modified Lysholm score. Results: The mean pre-operation Lysholm score was 79.1, 71.2, 68.5, 67.9, 67.2, 61.5 and post-operation Lysholm score was 86.3, 75.1, 73.0, 73.1, 73.2, 66.2 and 61.5%, 62.5%, 60.0%, 50.0%, 50.0%, 25.0% improved knee pain and 69.2%, 75.5%, 70.0%, 66.6%, 75.0%, 75.0% were satisfied knee surgery and 30.7%, 20.5%, 20.0%, 50.0%, 25.0%, 50.0% required further surgery in patients respectively. According to Kellgren and Lawrence classification, 7 cases(15.5%) progress grade 3 osteoarthritis. Conclusions: The radial tear of medial meniscus showed the poor results with arthroscopic meniscectomy even if the grade 0-2 osteoarthritis. For the improvement of the clinical results, consider the technique to restore the hoop stresses or use the high tibia osteotomy for preventing the osteoarthritis.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.11 no.1
• /
• pp.30-36
• /
• 2012

Purpose: We compared the clinical and radiological results of meniscectomy with HTO or without HTO for degenerative medial meniscus posterior horn with varus deformity. Materials and Methods: Forty-two patients who had medial meniscus degenerative root tear with varus deformity more than 3 degrees were included for this study. Among them, 30 patients were performed meniscectomy combined with open wedge HTO and 12 patients were performed only meniscectomy without HTO. The mean follow-up period was 52.5 months. The clinical results were evaluated based on symptom improvement, patients' subjective satisfaction for surgery and HSS score. We also compared the osteoarthritic progression between the group on preoperative and at the final follow up radiographs. Results: Symptom improvement was achieved in 83.3% (25 cases) with HTO group and 66.7% (8 cases) without HTO group at final follow up with a significant difference. Patients' satisfaction was achieved in 83.3% (25 cases) with HTO group and 58.3% (7 cases) without HTO group which has a significant difference. The HSS score was improved in both group (90.8: with HTO group, 89.0: without HTO group) at the final follow up without significant difference. WOMAC score was improved in both groups at the final follow up without significant difference. There were no significant differences in the osteoarthritic progression between two groups. Conclusion: The good clinical result for treatment of patient who have medial meniscus degenerative root tear with varus deformity, proximal high tibial osteotomy is considered absolutely necessary. However, the progression of degenerative arthritis, its effect on long term follow up will be needed.