• 한국마린엔지니어링학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국마린엔지니어링학회 2005년도 후기학술대회논문집
• /
• pp.106-107
• /
• 2005

Small vessels of less then 20 tonnage and leisure boats such as motor boats, sailing yachts, water motorcycle, etc have been excluded from the rules and regulations such as Marine Leisure Safety Act, Ship Act and Ship Safety Act for a long time in Korea. As a result, these small vessels and leisure boats have remained within the blind area of maritime safety and environment protection. Among these vessels and boats, some leisure boats such as motor boats of 20 horse power or more(excluding motor boats equipped with engine inside the vehicles), water motorcycles and rubber boats of 30 horse power or more are incorporated into the Marine Leisure Safety Act through the registry, safety inspection, insurance early 2005 in Korea. In relation to the scope of application of the national Acts concerned, I consider the conflicts between Acts and suggest the subordinate enforcement ordinance and regulations.

• 해양환경안전학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 해양환경안전학회 2005년도 추계학술대회지
• /
• pp.111-124
• /
• 2005

개정 수상레저안전법은 주5일 근무제의 확대시행과 더불어 수상레저활동의 대중화로 수상레저기구와 수상레저활동자가 급속하게 증가함에 따라 현행 제도의 운영과정에서 나타난 미비점을 보완하고자 2005년 3월에 개정$\cdot$공포되었다. 이 법은 수상레저기구를 이용한 수상레저활동의 안전에 관한 가장 중요한 규정들을 대부분 포함하고 있는데, 특히 수상레저기구의 등록 및 안전검사제도의 신설 도입과 수상레저활동자에 대해 보험가입을 의무화 한 것이 가장 주목할 만 하다. 본 논문에서는 수상레저안전법 개정에 따른 수상레저안전법 하위법령의 개정안과 수상레저기구관련 보험제도의 도입방안에 대하여 살펴보았다. 또 수상레저안전법에서 등록 및 안전검사와 관련하여 적용범위에서 상충될 여지가 있는 선박법 및 선박안전법에 대하여 문제가 되는 부분을 지적하고 이에 대한 해결방안을 제시하였다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제54권
• /
• pp.213-233
• /
• 2012

International Hull Clauses(IHC(2003)) which have replaced the old system, Institute Time Clauses, Hull(ITCH), used more than 100 years in the shipping industry that did not fit the reality of the market and customs was announced in 01/11/2003 and was intended to supplement the existing issues to reflect the terms that had been used. IHC(2003) was composed of systematical and logical phrases to minimize the conflict which happened between the insured and the insurer after the incident. But IHC(2003) is being ignored by both the insured and the insurer in the shipping industry due to the differences in both positions. In addition, the studies about IHC(2003) in local academics are very low and many companies in the shipping industry are using both systems, IHC(2003) and ITCH so the usage of IHC(2003) is not so activated. Thus, this study will examines the main features and the compositions of IHC(2003) and compare IHC(2003) with ITCH(1983) in some provisions in both systems and then derive some similarities from the both systems and finally would suggest the necessity and validity of active use of IHC(2003).