• 제목/요약/키워드: Manufacturing-part companies

검색결과 112건 처리시간 0.018초

삼국시대(三國時代) 병기체제(兵器體制)의 연구(硏究) (This Study of the Arms Used in the Three Kingdoms)

  • 김성태
    • 헤리티지:역사와 과학
    • /
    • 제34권
    • /
    • pp.20-58
    • /
    • 2001
  • In order to unravel the characteristics of arms used in the 'Three Kingdoms,' Kokuryo, Silla and Paikje. the classification and the developing procedures of the arms should be first discussed. At first, the basic arms of the soldiers of Three Kingdoms were iron swords, iron spearheads, and bows. During that period, swords attached a ring pommel were commonly used. But after 5A. D. a sword with a decoration pommel appeared. Infantry generally used iron spearheads. From the late 4A. D. the long spearheads were broadly used in cavalry battles. In the late 6A. D. infantry mainly used long spearheads, and this resulted in the foundation of long spearheads units. There were two kinds of bows: Short Bow whose arch is small and Long Bow whose arch is long. It is known that the Short Bow was widely used in Kokuryo and Paikje up to 5A. D. In the early era, infantry used Long Bow, yet it was vastly used after 6A. D. when a castle's strategical value was great and defending a castle was. significant. Above mentioned, as basic combat weapons, iron spearhead and bow were fundamental. In particular, the spearhead was the essential weapon to a soldier. Yet, arrow gun and hook-shape cutters were important weapons. Especially, after 6A.D., when a castle became strategically pivotal in military, the arrow gun became the important weapon. This resulted in the foundation of arrow gun units. Hook-shape cutters were used to snatch horsemen or to climb up to fall the castle. Yet, the cutter was not the Three Kingodoms' basic weapon. In addition, the three stages of arms development in the Three Kingdoms are formation stage, development stage, and settlement stage. The formation stage was the period when premitive military unit appeared in the Three Kingdoms. It ranged from 1B. C. to the mid 3A. D. At that time according to regions. there were two weapon systems operating: North area including Kokuryo and the northern part of Paikje and South area including Silla, Kaya and the southern part of Paikje. ln North area a sword with a ring attached at the end of the holder, iron spear with neck and mid-size flat holder and iron arrowhead with an extension to fix, were used. In this period, during a war calvary units were mostly used and their weapon systems seemed possibly to succeed in that of Kochosun. In the development stage, when LoLang's influence on surroundings became weak, Koguryo, Paikjae and Silla had directly contacted each other. In the late 3A.D. to the early 6A.D., Silla achieved a drastic improvement in weapon system. This was the period when Kokuryo played a leading role in arms race. Kokuryo's arms manufacturing techniques passed onto Silla, Kaya and Paikje. In combat strategy a joint operation between infantry and calvary prevailed even if their military tactics were different. In a calvary battle heavily armed horsemen played import roles at this period. The horsemen and even horses were heavily guarded with iron armors. After all, the appearance of fully armed horsemen implies the very need of powerful destructive forces in weapon system. At that time, basic weapons were a big sword with a ring attached at the end of the holder, swallow's tail-shape spear with neck, and iron spearhead with neck and an extension. The settlement stage began at the mid 6A.D., when it was the revolutionary period in the arms development history. Of course, actual proofs and picture documents were not sufficient enough to penetrate full scale of the weapon system. But, according to historical circumstances and historic records, it is very certain that this period was the peak in arms development. In this period special military units, such as infantry-calvary companies, Archery units and Long spear units, that executed particular duties with special weapons, were founded. This became the characteristics of the settlement stage.

DECO 필름 제조시 발생하는 PET·OPP 합성 폐필름 재활용의 경제성 분석 연구 (An Economic Analysis Study of Recycling PET·OPP Laminated Film Waste Generated during DECO Film Manufacturing)

  • 박미숙;김다연;양수진;이성유;김춘산;정옥진;황용우
    • 자원리싸이클링
    • /
    • 제32권3호
    • /
    • pp.57-67
    • /
    • 2023
  • 폐플라스틱에 대한 국가 간 수출입 제한에 따라, 폐플라스틱의 국내 처리 및 재활용 방안을 모색할 필요성이 커지고 있다. 본 연구에서는 국내 A 기업의 폐필름 발생 현황 및 운영 정보를 참고하여 가구 표면 마감용 sheet 및 edge 제조시 발생하는 PET·OPP 합성 폐필름의 재활용사업에 대한 비용 편익을 분석하였다. 폐플라스틱 처리는 그간 영세업체에 맡겨져 현황 파악이 어렵고 수익성 담보가 되지 않아, 재활용 기술이 있더라도 활용되기에 어려움이 따랐다. 본 연구에서는 폐플라스틱 물질 재활용 방안의 하나로써, 폐필름 발생 사업장에서 PET·OPP 합성 폐필름을 박리하여 폐PET 재활용이 이루어지는 것으로 가정하되, 재활용 비율은 정부가 「전주기 탈 플라스틱 대책」에서 제시한 수치를 활용하여 2%, 10%, 20%, 30% 재활용할 경우 비용편익을 분석하였다. 본 연구에서는 폐PET 재활용 방안으로 물리적 박리 기술이 도입되는 것으로 가정하여 폐PET 재활용 비율에 따른 비용편익분석을 수행하였다. 그 결과 폐PET의 재활용 비율이 30% 이상일 경우에만, 비용 편익비율(Benefit-cost ration, BCR)이 BCR ≥1 에 해당하여 최소비용 편익비율을 충족하는 것으로 나타났으며 이 때, BCR 값은 1.32였다. 향후 정부의 지원금 할당비율과 단가가 상향될 것으로 예상됨에 따라 비용 편익비율은 더욱 높아질 것으로 사료된다. 해당 사례는 유사 업종의 사업장에 폐PET 재활용 및 수익 창출을 위한 시범 Case가 될 것으로 기대된다.