• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.32-40
• /
• 1989

This study is based on 247 patients(348 cases) with facial bone fracture who were admitted to the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Kangnam sacred heart Hospital during the period of Jan. 1983 through sep. 1988. The patients with mandible fracture were analysed with the following items such as complications with treatment method undertaken : Bicortical osteosynthesis vs Monocortical osteosynthesis, advantages and Disadvantages. The results obtained are as follows : 1) The most common age groups for the facial bone fracture were 20 years 2) The ratio of Men to women was 5 : 1 3) The most frequent location of facial bone fractures was the Mandible(76.7%), Maxillae(10.6%), Zygoma(9.5%), Nasal bone(3.2%) 4) The ratio of Mandible to Maxillae was 7.2 : 1 5) In mandible fractures, the most frequent fracture site was Symphysis(48.7%) 6) In maxilla fractures, the most frequent case was Le fort III fracture(51.4%), followed by Le fort I fracture(29.7%), Le fort II fracture(18.9%) 7) The main contributing causes of facial bone fractures were Traffic Accident(37.7%), Fight(31.6%), Accident(27.5%) 8) In open reduction methods of mandible fracture, the frequency of postop, malocclusion was 15% in interosseous wiring, 7% in Bicortical osteosynthesis, 3% in Monocortical osteosynthesis. The miniplates show advantages over other forms of fixation, in that they are malleable and easy to insert, they achieve rigid fixation and stability.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.79-86
• /
• 1989

The is a retrospective study on the transoral approach to open reduction of the Mandibular fractures. Our study was based on a series of 64 patients with mandibular fractures among 99 patients of facial bone fractures who had been treated by transoral approach with or without extraoral approach at Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yonsei Medical Center, Yonsei University from January 1981 to October 1988. We studied favorite sites of open reduction, fixation methods, results and prognosis related to transoral approaches of Mandibular fractures, and which compared with extraoral approaches. The results obtained are as follows : 1. The transoral open reduction was used more frequently in Mandibular fractures(64.6%) than Midfacial bone fractures(35.4%). Among 64 patients of mandibular fractures, 47 patients(73.4%) were treated only by transoral approach and others(26.6%) were treated by both trans- and extra-oral approach. Among 92 sites of mandibular fractures, 75 sites(81.5%) were treated by transoral approach and 17(18.5%) were treated by extraoral approach. 2. The most favorite site for transoral approach compared with extraoral approach was Symphysis(100%), and Angle(62.5%) was next in order of frequency on Mandibular fractures. 3. Direct Interosseous Wiring(DIW) was most commonly used for fixation(64.6%) and Miniplate osteosynthesis was used next in 28.1%. 4. Simple(39.1%) and Compound(52.2%) fractures were frequently indicated for transoral approach, however comminuted fractures were rarely indicated. 5. The direction of fracture lines on Angle of the mandible did not influence to determine whether transoral approach should be selected or not. However this area seemed to be more difficult to reduce exactly by transoral procedure than other areas because simultaneous superior and inferior fixation was applied predominantly on this area. 6. The success rate of reduction and fixation analyzed from us was more excellent in Direct Interosseous Wiring(29/53=54.7%) than in Rigid Internal Fixation(9/29=31.0%). But it might be depended upon various factors as like as sugeon's skill. 7. The postoperative complication due to transoral open reduction of mandible was not high(12.0%) and this rate was similar with other published reports.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.201-206
• /
• 1998

We reviewed 240 patients with facial bone fractures treated at the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery between Jan. 1. 1997 to Dec. 31. 1997. These results were obtained as follows : 1. The ratio of men to women was 3.5 : 1 2. The age frequency was highest for people in their 20's 34.2%, in their 10's 21.63%, and in their 30's 20.41%. 3. The fractures were at the highest incidence in September at 13.3%, followed by in May at 11.25%. 4. The frequent causes were traffic accidents 47.9%, fisticuffs 20%, accidents caused by falling or slipping 16.25%, working traumas 8.75%, and sports 7.1%. 5. The most common location of facial bone fractures was the mandible 67.2%. The frequent fracture sites of the mandible were symphysis, angle, condyle, and body in the order. 6. The associated injuries of facial bone fractures were neurosurgry, orthopedic surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, ophthalmic surgery and general surgery. 7. In respect of treatment, open reduction used 84.3% of the time. 8. Post operation complicatins were as follows : neurological problem 2.08%, malunion 1.67%, facial asymetry 0.83%, malocclusion 0.83%, and infection 0.41%.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.93-100
• /
• 1989

This is a report of comparison of condyle fracture treatment by functional treatment and surgical treatment. In cases of functional therapy, mode of action of Activator that we used; By fulcrum of posterior teeth, the mandibular elevators of the opposite side cause the gap in the dental arches to be reduced, while the mandible performs a rotational movement about the fulcrum during which the fracture surface of the large fragment moves downward. Condylar fractures are often seen in association with fractures of other regions of the mandible. In our department, such cases were treated by miniplate and intramaxillary fixation. Surgical treatment of fractures of the mandible condylar were treated by intraoral approach. The result were drawn as follows : 1. Lateral displacement of condyle ; functional therapy with activator. 2. Compound fracture ; miniplate osteosynthesis and physiotherapy. 3. Anteriormedially displacement ; surgical treatment.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.32-38
• /
• 2005

The efficacy of bioresorbable fixation has recently been described in the osseosynthesis of the oral & maxillofacial region. However, a liitle data exist regarding the use of biodegradable plates and screws for the internal fixation of human mandible fractures. The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare the treatment of mandibular fractures by using a bioresorbable fixation system with conventional titanium system in human mandible fractures. eighteen patients constituted the bioresorbable fixation group and twenty-five patients constituted the titanium fixation group. Both groups underwent open reduction and internal fixation by use of a bioresorbable system or a titanium fixation system. Panoramic radiograph were obtained preoperatively, immediately postoperatively after reduction, at 6 months and at 12 months postoperatively. In the bioresorbable fixation group, complication(infection) occurred in 1 patient(5.6%) and was resolved by incision & drainage, plate removal and antibiotics without untoward sequelae. 2 patients(8.0%) experienced complications in the titanium fixation group and were treated using conservative treatment. There was no statistical difference in complication rates between two groups. Our data supported the use of bioresorbale plate fixation in mandibular fractures as a means of avoiding the potential and well documented problems with rigid titanium fixation systems. In conclusion, the bioresorbable fixation system provide a reliable and sufficient alternative to conventional titanium plate system.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제29권6호
• /
• pp.513-519
• /
• 2007

Typical surgical methods for the treatment of mandibular fractures include intermaxillary-fixation (IMF) for obtaining temporary intraoperative occlusion. Traditionally IMF has been achieved with arch-bars or interdental eyelet wiring. However, these techniques are time-consuming procedures, can produce periodontal damage, and are not well tolerated by the patient even under local anesthesia. Moreover, daily maintenance of oral hygiene is difficult for patients with an arch bar. Recently, intermaxillary fixation using intraoral skeletal anchorage screws (SAS) has been introduced for the treatment of mandibular fractures. This method solves the problems above, but they have the potential for tooth damage, screw fractures and intraoperative occlusal instability. In this study, patients with mandiblular fractures were divided into three groups. Group 1 was treated by IMF using archbars(both maxilla and mandible), Group 2 was treated with SAS(maxilla) and arch-bar (mandible), Group 3 was treated with SAS(both maxilla and mandible). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the different IMF methods on periodontal tissue health and intraoperative occlusal rehabilitation about each groups, and to discuss the most favorable IMF method.

• Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.183-187
• /
• 2018

Complex cervical spine fractures are a serious complications of maxillofacial trauma and associated with high mortality and neurological morbidity. Strict vigilance in preventing further insult to the cervical spine is a crucial step in managing patients who are at risk for neurologic compromise. We report a rare case of a right transverse process of atlas fracture with right-sided vertebral artery injury that was associated with a comminuted fracture of the body and angle of the mandible, which restricted mouth opening. Airway management was performed by an awake fiber-optic nasotracheal intubation, where neck movement was avoided with a cervical collar. Vertebral artery injuries may have disastrous consequences, such as basilar territory infarction and death, and should be suspected in patients with head and neck trauma. After mandibular plating, the patient was on cervical collar immobilization for 12 weeks and anti-coagulant therapy.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 1989

This is a retrospective study on maxillofacial fractures. This study was based on a series of 442 patients with maxillofacial fractures treated at Dept, of oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Chon Buk National University from Jan, 1984 to Sep. 1988. The results obtained were as follows: 1. The ratio of Male/Female was 4.8 : 1, and 3rd decade (43.9%) was the highest age group in incidence. 2. Monthly incidence was the highest in Oct,(10.6%). 3. The most frequent maxillofacial fracture site was mandible (70.0%), and zygoma & zygomatic arch (13.6%), maxilla(11.7%) and nasal bone (4.7%) were next in order of frequency. 4. Traffic accidents (47.5%), fight(24.8%) were the most common causes of maxillofacial fractures. 5. The most frequent chief complaint was painful swelling(40.7%). 6. In mandibular fractures, the most frequent fracture site was symphyseal area(28.9%) and simple fracture was the most frequent in type of fracture (71.2%). 7. In maxillary fractures, fracture with other facial bones (64.5%) was more frequent than fracture of maxilla only. The most common type of fracture was unilateral fractures(37.1%). 8. In fracture of zygoma complex, zygoma fracture was the most frequent fracture type(40.3%), zygoma and zygomatic arch fx, (30.6%), zygomatic arch fx, (29.1%) were next in order 9. Open reduction was major method of treatment in maxillofacial fractures : Mandible (77.5%), Maxilla (61.3%), Zygoma complex(43.1%). 10. Maxillofacial fractures were most frequently combined with head injury(39.3%), and lower extremities(17.0%), upper extremities(13.6%) were next in order.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.295-304
• /
• 1992

The author investigated the 162 patients with the condylar fractres of the mandible who were admitted in Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of Chosun Dental School from January 1985 to September 1992 clinically, including fracture incidennce, age and sex of the patients, causes of injures, associated injures, treatments and complications and obtained the following results. 1. Of the 449 patients with mandibular fractures, 162patients suffered condylar fractures(36.1%). 2. Of the 162 patients, males with condylar fractures were 128 patients, by a ratio of 3.8 : 1. 3. The most frequently affected age group was the third decade(32.7%). 4. Falls were ranked as the predominant cause(50.6%), followed by traffic accident(27.8%) and violence (16.0%). 5. The incidence of single condylar fractures was 28% and symphysis fractures were the most commomest of the concomittant injuries(60%). 6. The subcondylar fractures occurred most frequently(41.6%) and anteromedial displacement of the condylar fragments occurred most frequently(45.4%) 7. Of the all condylar fracture patients, children under 15 of age comprized 31 patients(19.1%) and condylar head fractures occurred most frequently at those children. 8. Of the managetments in condylar fractures, open reduction was 52.5% and remainder were closed reduction(47.5%). 9. Complications ensured such as TMJ ankylosis, limitation of mouth opening and mandibular movements, TMJ dysfunction, and anterior open bite.

• Imaging Science in Dentistry
• /
• 제39권2호
• /
• pp.93-98
• /
• 2009

Purpose: To classify and evaluate the mandibular fractures. Materials and Methods : The author classified the mandibular fractures of 284 patients who were referred to the Chonbuk National University Dental Hospital during the period from March 2004 to June 2007. This study was based on the conventional radiographs as well as computed tomographs which were pertained to the 284 patients who have had the mandibular fractures including the facial bone fractures. And mandibular fractures were classified with respect to gender, age, site and type of the fractures. Results: More frequently affected gender with mandibular fracture was male with the ratio of 3.3:1. The most frequently affected age with mandibular fracture was third decade (38%), followed by fourth decade (16%), second decade (15%), fifth decade (11 %), sixth decade (7%), seventh decade (5%), eighth decade (4%), first decade (4%), and ninth decade (0.3%). The most frequent type of mandibular fracture was single fracture (58%), followed by double fracture (39%), triple fracture (3%). The most common site of mandibular fracture was mandibular condyle as 113 cases (27.7%) and the next was mandibular symphysis as 109 cases (26.7%), mandibular angle as 103 cases (25.3%), mandibular body as 83 cases (20.3%) in order. The sum of fracture sites were 408 sites and there were 1.4 fracture sites per one patient. The number of mandible fractures accompanied with facial bone fractures were 41 cases (14.4%). Conclusion: The results showed the most frequent type and common site of mandibular fracture was single fracture and mandibular condyle respectively. (Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2009; 39: 93-8)