• Title/Summary/Keyword: MTCR

Search Result 13, Processing Time 0.021 seconds

미사일 기술통제 제도(MTCR)

  • Min, Gyeong-Ju;Lee, Seung-U
    • Defense and Technology
    • /
    • no.1 s.203
    • /
    • pp.42-55
    • /
    • 1996
  • 미국을 비롯한 선진 7개국에 의해 '87년 4월에 미사일 관련 부품 및 기술에 대하여 수출 통제가 합의된 이후, 지금까지 MTCR에 가입한 회원국은 25개국에 이르며, 비회원국중에서도 주요 미사일 수출국들은 MTCR지침을 준수하겠다고 약속하였다. 이에 정부는 구 COCOM 해체 후 급변하는 세계 정세 및 산업 고도화를 고려함과 동시에 국제적 지위 향상을 위해 미사일 비확산 체제의 회원국에 가입하고자 현재 추진중에 있다. 국내의 미사일 관련 전략 물자 수출 통제 제도를 원활히 운영해 나가기 위해서는 MTCR의 역사적 배경, 국제 활동 및 현안 문제점, 그리고 향후 예상되는 발전 과정을 이해하는 것이 중요하다고 생각한다. 따라서 이 글에서는 MTCR과 관련된 내용들의 문헌을 정리 요약하여 소개한다.

  • PDF

미사일 기술통제 제도(MTCR)

  • Min, Gyeong-Ju;Lee, Seung-U
    • Defense and Technology
    • /
    • no.11 s.201
    • /
    • pp.22-31
    • /
    • 1995
  • 미국을 비롯한 선진 7개국에 의해 '87년 4월에 미사일 관련 부품 및 기술에 대하여 수출 통제가 합의된 이후, 지금까지 MTCR에 가입한 회원국은 25개국에 이르며, 비회원국중에서도 주요 미사일 수출국들은 MTCR지침을 준수하겠다고 약속하였다. 이에 정부는 구 COCOM 해체 후 급변하는 세계 정세 및 산업 고도화를 고려함과 동시에 국제적 지위 향상을 위해 미사일 비확산 체제의 회원국에 가입하고자 현재 추진중에 있다. 국내의 미사일 관련 전략 물자 수출 통제 제도를 원활히 운영해 나가기 위해서는 MTCR의 역사적 배경, 국제 활동 및 현안 문제점, 그리고 향후 예상되는 발전 과정을 이해하는 것이 중요하다고 생각한다. 따라서 이 글에서는 MTCR과 관련된 내용들의 문헌을 정리 요약하여 소개한다.

  • PDF

미사일 기술통제 제도(MTCR)

  • Min, Gyeong-Ju;Lee, Seung-U
    • Defense and Technology
    • /
    • no.12 s.202
    • /
    • pp.24-35
    • /
    • 1995
  • 미국을 비롯한 선진 7개국에 의해 '87년 4월에 미사일 관련 부품 및 기술에 대하여 수출 통제가 합의된 이후, 지금까지 MTCR에 가입한 회원국은 25개국에 이르며, 비회원국중에서도 주요 미사일 수출국들은 MTCR지침을 준수하겠다고 약속하였다. 이에 정부는 구 COCOM 해체 후 급변하는 세계 정세 및 산업 고도화를 고려함과 동시에 국제적 지위 향상을 위해 미사일 비확산 체제의 회원국에 가입하고자 현재 추진중에 있다. 국내의 미사일 관련 전략 물자 수출 통제 제도를 원활히 운영해 나가기 위해서는 MTCR의 역사적 배경, 국제 활동 및 현안 문제점, 그리고 향후 예상되는 발전 과정을 이해하는 것이 중요하다고 생각한다. 따라서 이 글에서는 MTCR과 관련된 내용들의 문헌을 정리 요약하여 소개한다.

  • PDF

Groping for Cooperative Space Activities in the Northeast Asia (동북아시아에서의 우주협력의 모색)

  • Rhee, Sang-Myon
    • The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
    • /
    • v.22 no.1
    • /
    • pp.75-103
    • /
    • 2007
  • The purpose of this paper is to suggest to tackle the problem of poor cooperation in space activities, by re-examining the nature of the competitive political environment, and by building up a normative overarching framework, One of the most acute problems that hampers regional cooperation is the U.S. influence as represented in the MTCR, a supplier's cartel, as was evidenced in the ill-fate of the 2001 launch contract between China and Korea the next year. Notably China, the third space power in the world, has not been allowed to join the MTCR despite her application in June 2004. A possible reconciliation between China and the MTCR over her application for a partnership would set a cornerstone in building up a cooperative environment in the Northeast Asia. Just as the Helsinki process was an overarching norm building framework, comprising human rights, security and environmental issues, it would be desirable that a future peace framework in Northeast Asia dealing with the pending issues of Korean peninsula should also comprise of such broad issues as one relating to cooperation in space activities in the region. South Korea could tap expertise from her neighbor China. When South Korea become an independent space power either with her own technology or otherwise, she would be in a better position to play a role as a balancer in coordinating between the two neighboring space giants. It is remarkable that the Japanese led APRSAT has contributed much in establishing Sentinel Asia as a part of the Disaster Management Scheme, in that each participant, whether it be a state agency, or a private entity like a university or a research institute, can tap the common data to contribute to the common good of safety.

  • PDF

Groping for Cooperative Space Activities in the Northeast Asia (동북아시아에서의 우주협력의 모색)

  • Rhee, Sang-Myon
    • The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
    • /
    • no.spc
    • /
    • pp.59-86
    • /
    • 2007
  • The purpose of this paper is to suggest to tackle the problem of poor cooperation in space activities, by re-examining the nature of the competitive political environment, and by building up a normative overarching framework, One of the most acute problems that hampers regional cooperation is the U.S. influence as represented in the MTCR, a supplier's cartel, as was evidenced in the ill-fate of the 2001 launch contract between China and Korea the next year. Notably China, the third space power in the world, has not been allowed to join the MTCR despite her application in June 2004. A possible reconciliation between China and the MTCR over her application for a partnership would set a cornerstone in building up a cooperative environment in the Northeast Asia. Just as the Helsinki process was an overarching norm building framework, comprising human rights, security and environmental issues, it would be desirable that a future peace framework in Northeast Asia dealing with the pending issues of Korean peninsula should also comprise of such broad issues as one relating to cooperation in space activities in the region. South Korea could tap expertise from her neighbor China. When South Korea become an independent space power either with her own technology or otherwise, she would be in a better position to play a role as a balancer in coordinating between the two neighboring space giants. It is remarkable that the Japanese led APRSAT has contributed much in establishing Sentinel Asia as a part of the Disaster Management Scheme, in that each participant, whether it be a state agency, or a private entity like a university or a research institute, can tap the common data to contribute to the common good of safety.

  • PDF

이란의 우주개발과 미사일기술통제체제(MTCR) 규제

  • Gong, Hyeon-Cheol;O, Beom-Seok;Hong, Il-Hui
    • Current Industrial and Technological Trends in Aerospace
    • /
    • v.5 no.2
    • /
    • pp.98-106
    • /
    • 2007
  • 한 나라의 우주개발은 막대한 예산과 많은 시간이 소요되기 때문에 정부주도로 연구개발사업을 시작하는 것이 대체적인 선례이다. 하지만 때로는 우주개발을 지역사회나 주변 국가들과의 상황에 따라 생존을 위한 방편으로도 활용될 수 있다. 이러한 우려를 불식시키거나 완화하자는 차원에서 국제사회가 다자간 협의체인 미사일기술통제체제(MTCR, Missile Technology Control Regime)을 1987년부터 시작하여 매년 총회 및 회기간 회의를 통하여 국제사회에서 대량파괴무기의 운반체로 미사일이나 무인항공기 등과 관련된 시스템 및 부품 등의 기술이전 등에 관하여 규제를 하고 있는 것이다. 최근 국제사회에서 핵 프로그램 및 미사일 문제로 논쟁의 핵심이 되고 있는 이란에 대하여 우주개발과 미사일기술통제체제의 규제 등의 관점에서 본 논문을 검토하고자 한다.

  • PDF

Study of the U.S. Missile Non-proliferation Policy Applied on Space Launch Vehicles of India and China (인도와 중국 우주발사체에 적용된 미국의 비확산정책 연구)

  • Choe, Nammi
    • Journal of Aerospace System Engineering
    • /
    • v.10 no.4
    • /
    • pp.59-66
    • /
    • 2016
  • India and China are capable of developing indigenous space launch vehicles, with the rocket technology transferred from the U.S., Western countries, and the Soviet Union, in the 1950s and 1960s. Barring the early 1990s, both countries are absent in the missile nonproliferation regime, and have no major space cooperation records with the U.S., since the establishment of the Missile Technology Control Regime in 1987. With the advent of the $21^{st}$ century, historic progress has been made in the U.S.-India space cooperation, which includes using Indian launch vehicles to launch U.S.non-commercial satellites. However, the U.S. is skeptical with regards to space cooperation and using Chinese space launch vehicle services. In this paper, we present the U.S. nonproliferation policy applied on launch vehicles of India and China, and different aspects of the policy will be examined to draw implications on Korean space activities.

Research for Space Activities of Korea Air Force - Political and Legal Perspective (우리나라 공군의 우주력 건설을 위한 정책적.법적고찰)

  • Shin, Sung-Hwan
    • The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
    • /
    • v.18
    • /
    • pp.135-183
    • /
    • 2003
  • Aerospace force is a determining factor in a modem war. The combat field is expanding to space. Thus, the legitimacy of establishing aerospace force is no longer an debating issue, but "how should we establish aerospace force" has become an issue to the military. The standard limiting on the military use of space should be non-aggressive use as asserted by the U.S., rather than non-military use as asserted by the former Soviet Union. The former Soviet Union's argument is not even strongly supported by the current Russia government, and realistically is hard to be applied. Thus, the multi-purpose satellite used for military surveillance or a commercial satellite employed for military communication are allowed under the U.S. principle of peaceful use of space. In this regard, Air Force may be free to develop a military surveillance satellite and a communication satellite with civilian research institute. Although MTCR, entered into with the U.S., restricts the development of space-launching vehicle for the export purpose, the development of space-launching vehicle by the Korea Air Force or Korea Aerospace Research Institute is beyond the scope of application of MTCR, and Air Force may just operate a satellite in the orbit for the military purpose. The primary task for multi-purpose satellite is a remote sensing; SAR sensor with high resolution is mainly employed for military use. Therefore, a system that enables Air Force, the Korea Aerospace Research Institute, and Agency for Defense Development to conduct joint-research and development should be instituted. U.S. Air Force has dismantled its own space-launching vehicle step by step, and, instead, has increased using private space launching vehicle. In addition, Military communication has been operated separately from civil communication services or broadcasting services due to the special circumstances unique to the military setting. However, joint-operation of communication facility by the military and civil users is preferred because this reduces financial burden resulting from separate operation of military satellite. During the Gulf War, U.S. armed forces employed commercial satellites for its military communication. Korea's participation in space technology research is a little bit behind in time, considering its economic scale. In terms of budget, Korea is to spend 5 trillion won for 15 years for the space activities. However, Japan has 2 trillion won annul budget for the same activities. Because the development of space industry during initial fostering period does not apply to profit-making business, government supports are inevitable. All space development programs of other foreign countries are entirely supported by each government, and, only recently, private industry started participating in limited area such as a communication satellite and broadcasting satellite, Particularly, Korea's space industry is in an infant stage, which largely demands government supports. Government support should be in the form of investment or financial contribution, rather than in the form of loan or borrowing. Compared to other advanced countries in space industry, Korea needs more budget and professional research staff. Naturally, for the efficient and systemic space development and for the prevention of overlapping and distraction of power, it is necessary to enact space-related statutes, which would provide dear vision for the Korea space development. Furthermore, the fact that a variety of departments are running their own space development program requires a centralized and single space-industry development system. Prior to discussing how to coordinate or integrate space programs between Agency for Defense Development and the Korea Aerospace Research Institute, it is a prerequisite to establish, namely, "Space Operations Center"in the Air Force, which would determine policy and strategy in operating space forces. For the establishment of "Space Operations Center," policy determinations by the Ministry of National Defense and the Joint Chief of Staff are required. Especially, space surveillance system through using a military surveillance satellite and communication satellite, which would lay foundation for independent defense, shall be established with reference to Japan's space force plan. In order to resolve issues related to MTCR, Air Force would use space-launching vehicle of the Korea Aerospace Research Institute. Moreover, defense budge should be appropriated for using multi-purpose satellite and communication satellite. The Ministry of National Defense needs to appropriate 2.5 trillion won budget for space operations, which amounts to Japan's surveillance satellite operating budges.

  • PDF

핵, 생ㆍ화학무기 및 미사일의 확산 제재: 최근 미국내 관련 법규 개요

  • Kim, Hyeon-Cheol
    • Science & Technology Policy
    • /
    • v.13 no.4 s.142
    • /
    • pp.90-101
    • /
    • 2003
  • 대량살상무기의 확산을 근본적으로 차단하기 위한 경제 제재의 활용은 1990년대에 들어서 새로운 차원으로 전개됨. 이전시기까지 제정된 법규들은 특정한 핵확산 활동에 관여한 국가들에 대한 외국원조의 중단을 요구하였으며, 해당 국가들이 관련 조약 및 국제협약상의 목표를 준수하게끔 하나의 가능한 메커니즘으로서 제재 방안들을 규정함. 1990년에 들어서서 미 의회는 미사일 확산에 관련되어 무역제재를 위한 명확한 지침을 입법화함. 1990년에 들어서 무기수출통제법(Arms Export Control Act)과 1979년 수출관리법 (Export Adminstration Act of 1979)에 미사일기술통제레짐의 부속서(MTCR Annex)에 등재된 품목이나 기술을 거래하는데 관여한 미국 시민 또는 외국인에 대해 미 대통령이 규제를 부과한다는 점이 필수사항으로 첨가됨. 이어서 미 의회는 광범위한 형태의 법률을 통해 생ㆍ화학무기 및 핵무기의 확산에 기여하는 국가들에 대해 경제제재를 가할 것을 입법화함. 본 보고서에서는 미국내 비확산 규정을 위반한 국가, 기업 또는 개인들에 대해 일종의 경제제재를 부과하는 것을 요구하거나 승인하는 법규들을 간략히 서술하고 있음. 다음에 열거하는 각각의 규정에는 제재 부과의 이유, 제재 기간에 관련된 정보를 포함하여, 미 대통령이 제재 부과를 연기, 중단 및 포기할 수 있는 권한의 구체적 내용들을 서술함.

  • PDF

[Retracted] A Study on the Export Control System and its Effective Implementation Plan in Korea ([논문 철회] 한국의 전략물자 수출통제제도의 문제점과 효율적 이행방안)

  • Lee, Sang-Ok
    • International Commerce and Information Review
    • /
    • v.13 no.3
    • /
    • pp.353-375
    • /
    • 2011
  • Export control was first triggered by international export control system at US led COCOM in 1949. Numerous international efforts such as NPT in 1969, ZC in 1970, NSG in 1978, AG in 1985, MTCR in 1987, Wassenaar Arrangement(WA) establishment in 1995 with 1990's the fall of the Berlin Wall, have been made since. The concept of export control has been changed from weaponry and parts export control to preventing or blocking weaponry, respective goods and relevant technology from the hand of troubled regions and non-state actors as terrorist groups; and the new concept is described as Nonproliferation Control. Extent of control items is not only limited to conventional weaponry, but also includes weapons of mass destruction(WMD) and even dual use items which can be used for production, development, usage or storage. Control items include all items defined by NSG, MTCR, AG, WA, and CMC-Opec. The 9.11 terror had a strong influence on international society. Effort to prevent WMD proliferation has now become the most important issue for international security. This study aims to suggest improvement points for nonproliferation law and its effective implementation, based on problem and limitation identification along with analysis of nonproliferation law and implementation examples by type. Furthermore for the purpose of national and global security, export control system on strategic items which are considered to be a key issue in South and North Korea relationship needs to be effectively managed. Recently, North Korea's missile and nuclear tests have been criticized globally; and the global society including respective countries as China and South Korea is striving to urge export control in line with the UN resolution.

  • PDF