• Title/Summary/Keyword: Lumbar selective nerve root block

Search Result 4, Processing Time 0.024 seconds

Treatment of Wallenberg's Syndrome Following Selective Nerve Root Block: A Case Report (요추부 선택적 신경근 차단술 이후 발생한 Wallenberg's Syndrome의 한방복합치료 1례)

  • Park, Seo-Hyun;Kwon, Jeong-Gook;Park, Jae-Won;Keum, Dong-Ho
    • Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation
    • /
    • v.26 no.4
    • /
    • pp.107-115
    • /
    • 2016
  • The occurrence of brain stem stroke after lumbar selective nerve root block seem to be an uncommon event comparing it to after cervical selective nerve root block. We recently experienced a 60-year-old man who were diagnosed as left lateral medullary infarction (Wallenberg's syndrome) after lumbar selective nerve root block. He was treated by traditional Korean medicine with acupunture, Pulsed electromagetic therapy (PEMT), herb medicine. The range of motion of upper and lower extremity, manual muscle test, Korean version of Berg balance scale (K-BBS) and Korean version of Barthel index (K-MBI) were adopted to measure the resulting recovery after 4 weeks treatment. Traditional Korean medicine was effective for rehabilitation of patient. Further studies are needed to set up and Korean medical protocol for Wallenberg's syndrome.

Rt $S_1$ Root Block during Rt $L_5$ Root Block in the Lumbar Radiculopathy (요부 신경질환에서 우측 $L_5$ 신경근 차단시 보여진 우측 $S_1$ 신경근 차단)

  • Kim, Jong-Lul;Yoon, Keon-Jung;Kang, Jun-Goo;Kim, Kyung-Hee;Lim, Chung-Hyuck;Lee, Myung-Woo;Park, Kyu-Ho;Choi, Hae-Sung
    • The Korean Journal of Pain
    • /
    • v.11 no.2
    • /
    • pp.307-310
    • /
    • 1998
  • Selective lumbosacral radiculography and nerve root block techniques are very useful in determining the nerve root involved. We have done the lumbar root block to 61-year-old female who had suffered from low back pain radiating to right lower leg which was not relieved by epidural steroid injection two times. $L_5$ root block was performed under the fluoroscopic C-arm guide. When the needle was in correct position, we injected contrast medium (Isovist$^{(R)}$ - 300, Schering, Germany). After we injected 1.5 cc isovist, the S1 root was figured but L5 root was not figured. When we reinjected 1.5 cc isovist, $S_1$ root was enhanced and $L_5$ root was slightly visible due to severe disc bulging and lateral spinal stenosis.

  • PDF

The Efficacy of Ultrasonography-guided S1 Selective Nerve Root Block (초음파를 이용한 제 1천추 선택적 신경근 차단술의 유용성)

  • Jeon, Young Dae;Kim, Tae Gyun;Shim, Dae Moo;Kim, Chang Su
    • The Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Ultrasound Society
    • /
    • v.7 no.2
    • /
    • pp.113-119
    • /
    • 2014
  • Purpose: This study was to evaluate effect and efficiency of S1 selective nerve root block using ultrasonography-guided compared with fluoroscopy-guided for lumbar disc herniation or spinal stenosis patients. Materials and Methods: Between February 2012 and December 2013, 38 patients who were with lower leg radiating pain for more than 1months and underwent S1 selective spinal nerve root block in our institution, were reviewed. They divided into two groups: Group A included 18 patients with ultrasonography-guided and Group B included 20 patients with fluoroscopy-guided. Treatment effectiveness was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Korea Modified Oswestry Disability Index (K-MODI). They were evaluated its preoperatively, postoperatively and 1 month later. We were recorded whole procedure time. Results: VAS was improved from 7.4 to 4.7 at 1 month in group A and from 7.39 to 4.36 at 1month in group B. K-MODI was improved from 72.8 to 43.3 at 1month in group A and from 73.8 to 44.1 at 1month in group B. Whole procedure time were $477.53{\pm}115.02s$, $492.47{\pm}144.38s$ in group A, group B, respectively. But there was no significant difference in VAS and K-MODI between two groups. Conclusion: Ultrasonography-guided sacral nerve root block is effective and accurate method in sacral radiating pain.

  • PDF

Ultrasound-Guided Injections in the Lumbar and Sacral Spine (요추 및 천추부에 대한 초음파 유도하 중재 시술)

  • Ko, Kwang Pyo;Song, Jae Hwang;Kim, Whoan Jeang;Kim, Sang Bum;Min, Young Ki
    • Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
    • /
    • v.25 no.4
    • /
    • pp.185-195
    • /
    • 2018
  • Study Design: Literature review. Objective: Ultrasound-guided injections are a common clinical treatment for lower lumbosacral pain that are usually performed before surgical treatment if conservative treatment fails. The aim of this article was to review ultrasound-guided injections in the lumbar and sacral spine. Summary of Literature Review: Ultrasound-guided injections, unlike conventional interventions using computed tomography or C-arm fluoroscopy, can be performed under simultaneous observation of muscles, ligaments, vessels, and nerves. Additionally, they have no radiation exposure and do not require a large space for the installation of equipment, so they are increasingly selected as an alternative method. Materials and Methods: We searched for and reviewed studies related to the use of ultrasound-guided injections in the lumbar and sacral spine. Results: In order to perform accurate ultrasound-guided injections, it is necessary to understand the patient's posture during the intervention, the relevant anatomy, and normal and abnormal ultrasonographic findings. Facet joint intra-articular injections, medial branch block, epidural block, selective nerve root block, and sacroiliac joint injections can be effectively performed under ultrasound guidance. Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided injections in the lumbar and sacral spine are an efficient method for treating lumbosacral pain.