• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2005.09a
• /
• pp.50-52
• /
• 2005

• Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.183-206
• /
• 1984

• The Bulletin of The Korean Astronomical Society
• /
• v.30 no.1
• /
• pp.44.2-44.2
• /
• 2005

• Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
• /
• v.31 no.2
• /
• pp.225-229
• /
• 2018

Objective: This experiment was designed to evaluate the effect of supplementation with soybean or canola oil on milk production and the composition of long chain fatty acids as well as weight changes in the goats and their kids. Methods: Thirty nine mulitparous crossed Alpine${\times}$Nubian goats (initial body weight [BW] $43.5{\pm}1.7kg$) from the day of parturition were assigned to the treatments: grazing control (n = 15); grazing plus 20 mL/goat/d of supplemental soybean oil (n = 12); and grazing plus 20 mL/goat/d of supplemental canola oil (n = 12) from November 26, 2014 to March 7, 2015. The planned contrasts were: CI (control vs supplemented with oils); CII (soybean vs canola oil) to compare the treatment effects. Results: The vegetable oil supplementation reduced weight losses in lactating goats (CI: -0.060 vs 0.090 kg/d; p = 0.03) but did not improve milk production or affect kids' growth. The content of C4, C6, C8, C10, C11, C14, and C18:1n9t in the milk was increased (p<0.05) with respect to control. However, C12, C14, C16, C18, C18:1n9c, C18:2n6c, and C18:3n3 were reduced (p<0.05) in supplemented goats. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) was increased (p<0.05) in goats supplemented with oils compared to the control group. Conclusion: Supplementation with 20 mL/d of soybean or canola oil did not affect milk production or kids' performance; however, it increased CLA concentration and reduced the reduced weight losses in lactating goats.

• Proceedings of the Korean Magnestics Society Conference
• /
• 2007.05a
• /
• pp.63.1-63.1
• /
• 2007

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• v.33 no.1
• /
• pp.59-60
• /
• 2020

• The Bulletin of The Korean Astronomical Society
• /
• v.29 no.2
• /
• pp.44.1-44.1
• /
• 2004

• Journal of Public Diplomacy
• /
• v.2 no.1
• /
• pp.136-142
• /
• 2022

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• v.22 no.5
• /
• pp.864-866
• /
• 2021

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• v.44 no.3
• /
• pp.217-222
• /
• 2017

Background The prevalence of flap necrosis after palatoplasty in patients with cleft palate. The prevalence of mucoperiosteal flap necrosis after palatoplasty remains unknown, and this complication is rare. This event is highly undesirable for both the patient and the surgeon. We present here a new scale to evaluate the degree of hypoplasia of the palate and identify patients with cleft palate at high risk for the development of this complication. Methods In this case series, a 20-year retrospective analysis (1994-2014) identified patients from our records (medical records and screening day registries) with nonsyndromic cleft palate who underwent operations at 3 centers. All of these patients underwent operations using 2-flap palatoplasty and also underwent a physical examination with photographs and documentation of the presence of palatal flap necrosis after primary palatoplasty. Results Palatal flap necrosis was observed in 4 cases out of 1,174 palatoplasties performed at these centers. The observed prevalence of palatal flap necrosis in these groups was 0.34%. Conclusions The prevalence of flap necrosis can be reduced by careful preoperative planning, and prevention is possible. The scale proposed here may help to prevent this complication; however, further studies are necessary to validate its utility.