• The korean journal of orthodontics
• /
• v.30 no.3 s.80
• /
• pp.355-365
• /
• 2000

The treatment plan for orthognathic surgery must be based on accurate predictions, and this can be produced the most esthetic results. Treatment of prognathic mandible in adult is usually orthognathic surgery using mandible set back, but mandible with retruded chin point is needed additional chin augmentation. In this case, the directions between mandible and chin point are different therefore, the prediction of soft tissue reactions must be modified. In this study, we materialize the patients who was taken orthognathic surgery due to prognathic mandible, 11each(Group A) was taken only Bilateral Sagittal Sprit Ramus Osteotomy (BSSRO), 9each(Group B) was taken additional advancement genioplasty. The lateral cephalometric radiography taken 8 months later after orthognathic surgery by this patients were used. The results of this study were as follows : 1. The profile of lips was favorable after surgery due to upper lip to I-line became prominent and lower lip tc E-line was retruded. 2. In both group, upper lip moved posteriorly and nasolabial angle was increased. 3. The ratio of the soft tissue profile change in POGs point to skeletal B point movement was $84\%$ in group A and $66\%$ in group B, and there was statistical significance between group A and group B. 4. Vertical movement of hard tissue points is decreased in group A.

• The korean journal of orthodontics
• /
• v.28 no.5 s.70
• /
• pp.825-838
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences of soft tissue profile changes between the growing patients and the adult who had passed the growth peak, in orthodontic treatment with four premolar extractions. The results which was taken by correlating the soft tissue changes with hard tissue changes, lip thickness, molar relationship and arch length discrepancy in both groups was like the followings. 1. Significant hard tissue changes were decrease of VIs, VIi, UlPP, LlMP, HIi and increase of HPog'in adults and decrease of VIs, VIi and increase of VA, VPog'and all the vertical measurements in adolescents. 2. Significant soft tissue changes were decrease of VLs, VLi, and VILS in adults and increase of VSn, VSLS, VLs, VPog' and almost all vertical measurements in adolescents, and ${\Delta}LsE,\;{\Denta}LiE$ in adults and ${\Delta}LsE,\;{\Denta}LiE,\;{\Delta}LiSP\;and\;{\Delta}Mang$ was also significant 3. Correlation coefficient between ${\Delta}VIs\;and\;{\Delta}VLs$ was the greatest in adults and the next was ${\Delta}Ii/{\Delta}Li,\;{\Delta}Ii/{\Delta}ILS,\;{\Delta}ID/{\Delta}Li\;and\;{\Delta}ID/{\Delta}ILS$. In contrast all the vertical and horizontal measurements of hard and soft tissue in adolescents showed statistically significant corerrlation. 4. There were differences in correlation between soft tissue changes and incisor inclination and retraction at both groups, but the lower lip, nasolabial angle and mentolabial angle were commonly less influenced by the hard tissue changes in both groups. 5. The thinner the upper lip was, the more the ${\Delta}LsSP$ was in both groups, and the thinner the lower lip was, the more the ${\Delta}LiE\;and\;{\Denta}LiSP$ was in adolescents. 6. Molar relationship didn't influence the soft tissue profile changes. 7. Arch length discrepancy didn't influence the soft tissue profile changes.