• 한국물환경학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.97-103
• /
• 2006

Excess sludge treatment and disposal currently represent a rising challenge for domestic or wastewater treatment plants due to economic, environmental and regulation factors. Conventional gravity sedimentation process has been widely used in sludge thickening. The operation method of the process is very simple, but the process requires long detention time for sludge thickening, uses polymers, and shows low sludge thickening efficiency. To solve the problems, we studied on DAF (Dissolved Air Flotation) system. We use bulking sludge of a paper manufacturing plant. The effects of parameters such as SVI (Sludge Volume Index), storage time, initial concentration and wet density of excess sludge were examined. The results showed that the more SVI was low, the more sludge was thickened. As storage time goes by, SVI was increased and thickening performance was deteriorated. In order to improve flotation performance at high concentration, high recycling ratio and pressure did not increase the concentration due to thickening limitation. The addition of 0.8 g/L of loess was increased flotation efficiency of 1.41 times.

• 대한환경공학회지
• /
• 제36권3호
• /
• pp.172-177
• /
• 2014

가압형 부상법에 비해 낮은 압력에서 미세기포를 발생시키는 저압형 부상법을 슬러지 부상 농축에 적용하여 그 성능을 검증하고 실제 적용가능성을 확인하였다. 파일롯 규모의 저압형 부상조를 충남 N.S. 하수처리장에 설치하여 혼합슬러지의 농도, 응집제 주입량 및 혼합슬러지 대비 미세기포수의 비율과 같은 운전 변수가 혼합슬러지 농축에 미치는 영향을 확인하였다. 미세기포는 내부 압력이$1.5kgf/cm^2$으로 유지된 미세기포발생기에서 공기와 기포조제가 포함된 물을 고속 충돌 방식으로 발생시켰으며, 이를 부상농축 실험에 사용하였다. 장기운전 시 유입된 혼합슬러지의 SS 농도는 평균 14,400 mg/L였으며, 응집제 농도 27.6 mg/L, 기포조제 농도 4.0 mg/L, 혼합슬러지 대비 미세기포수의 비를 9.7%로 하여 저압형 부유부상조를 운전한 결과, 60,300 mg/L의 농축슬러지 고형물함량과 99% 이상의 고형물 회수율을 얻었다. 이 경우의 고형물 표면적 부하율은 $30kg/m^2/hr$로 2011년 환경부에서 제정한 하수도 상압 부상농축 시설기준 25 $kg/m^2/hr$을 상회하였다.

• 상하수도학회지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.235-241
• /
• 2004

The dissolved air flotation (DAF) process has been widely used for removing suspended solids with low density in water. It has been known as measuring the size of microbubbles precisely which move upward rapidly in contact zone is difficult. In this study particle counter monitoring (PCM) method is used to measure the rising microbubble after injection from a nozzle. Size and distribution curve of microbubbles are evaluated at different conditions such as pressure drop at intermediate valve, length of pipeline between saturation tank and nozzle and low pressure. And the efficiency is also checked when it collides with different size floc. The experimental results show the following fact. As the final pressure drop occurred closer to a nozzle, the bubble size became smaller. And small bubble collides with large floc as well as small one because of its physical characteristic. However large bubble collides well with large floc rather than small one since hydrodynamic flow in streamline interferes to collide between two. With performing computational process by mathematical model we have analyzed and verified the size effect between bubble and floc. Collision efficiency is the highest when P/B ratio shows in the range of 0.75 < P/B ratio ($R_{particle/Rbubble}$) < 2.0.

• 한국물환경학회지
• /
• 제35권6호
• /
• pp.567-573
• /
• 2019

DABF(Dissolve Air Flotation with Ball Filter) is developed as the DAF with the addition of a fiber ball at the lower part of the DAF. The DABF with a capacity of 4,500 ㎥/h was constructed at Gijang SWRO plant in Busan. Since the ball filter has high filtration rate, the loading rate of DABF was designed from 20 to 42 ㎥/h/㎡. When one DABF basin is in the back washing mode, the loading rate of other two DABF basins is increased to 42 ㎥/h/㎡. Turbidity at the BF outlet in DABF is <2 NTU at turbidity of 5-10 NTU at the BF inlet. If there is no algae bloom and turbidity is low in raw seawater, only BF in DABF is operated and meets <2 NTU at the BF outlet. Even if BF is operated at high hydraulic loading rates, no significant differential pressure increases and reduction in the turbidity removal rate is minimal in a day. Thus, DABF is the pre-treatment technology that provides stable water quality even with BF onlyoperation without DAF operation. Compared with the DAF, DABF requires additional facilities such as valves, piping, and drainage systems for backwashing the BF. But in terms of footprint and operating costs, DABF has more advantages than DAF. With DABF application, the load of the downstream filtration equipment is decreased so that the capacity of the filtration equipment can be reduced. Also, if the downstream filtration equipment is to be maintained the same regardless of DABF, the operating cost of DABF is less than DAF.