• 제목/요약/키워드: Local void

검색결과 72건 처리시간 0.019초

탈수(脫水) 및 건조기법(乾燥技法)을 이용한 정수장(淨水場) 슬러지 감량화(減量化) (Sludge Minimization by Using Dewater and Thermal Treatment in the Water Treatment Plant)

  • 전항배;김영한;김량
    • 유기물자원화
    • /
    • 제2권1호
    • /
    • pp.87-98
    • /
    • 1994
  • 슬러지 발생량은 정수처리공정에서 부터 슬러지 농축 및 탈수에 이르는 과정을 최적화하므로써 감량화할 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 탈수 및 건조기법에 의하여 정수처리공정에서 발생하는 슬러지의 함수율을 낮추어 슬러지 발생량을 줄이는 방법에 대하여 연구하였다. 탈수효율향상을 위한 polymer 투입량 및 교반조건등을 최적화하고, 온도에 따른 슬러지의 중량변화에 대하여 관찰하였다. 탈수효율은 polymer의 종류보다 교반강도에 의한 영향이 크고, pH의 영향도 큰 것으로 나타났다. 최적 polymer 주입농도는 1.5mg-polymer/g-TSS이었고, pH가 약산성이나 약알카리성 조건에서 탈수효율이 양호한 것으로 나타났다. 교반강도는 낮을수록(10,000ses-1이하) 효율이 향상되었고, 속도구배(G)보다 GT값이 중요한 영향인자인 것으로 나타났다. 자유수의 건조는 $100^{\circ}C$ 전후, 화학적 결함수는 $300^{\circ}C$ 근방에서 증발하며, 유기물질은 약 $300-600^{\circ}C$ 구간에서 산화되어 증발하는 것으로 나타났다. 취수원 수질에 따라 강열감량은 약 15-40%로 나타났으며, 화학적 결합수에 의한 감량이 약 10-20%, 유기물질에 의한 감량이 약 4-20%인 것으로 나타났다.

  • PDF

2011년 주요 의료 판결 분석 (Review of 2011 Major Medical Decisions)

  • 유현정;서영현;이정선;이동필
    • 의료법학
    • /
    • 제13권1호
    • /
    • pp.199-247
    • /
    • 2012
  • According to the review and analysis of medical cases that are assigned to the Supreme Court and all local High Court in 2011 and that are presented in the media, it was found that the following categories were taken seriously, medical and pharmaceutical product liability, the third principle of trust between medical institutions, negligence and causation estimation, responsibility limit, the meaning of medical records and related judgment of disturbed substantiation, Oriental doctors' duties to explain the procedures, IMS events, whether one can claim for each medical care operated by non-physician health care institutions to the nonmedical domain in the National Health Insurance Corporation, and the basis of norms for each claim. In the cases related to medical pharmaceutical product liability, Supreme Court alleviated burden of proof for accidents with medical and pharmaceutical products prior to the practice of Product Liability Law and onset the point of negative prescription as the time of damage strikes to condition feasibility of the specific situation. In the cases related to the 3rd principle of trust between medical institutions, the Supreme Court refused to sentence the doctor who has trusted the judgment of the same third-party doctors the violations of the care duty. With respect to proof of a causal relationship and damages in a medical negligence case, the Supreme Court decided that it is unjust to deny negligence by the materials of causal relationship rejecting the original verdict and clarified that the causal relationship shall not deny the reasons to limit doctors' responsibilities. In order not put burden on patients with disadvantages in which medical records and the description of the practice or the most fundamental and important evidence to prove negligence and causation are being neglected, the Supreme Court admitted in the hospital's responsibility for the case of the neonate death of suffocation without properly listed fetal heart rate and uterine contraction monitor. On the other hand, the Seoul Western District Court has admitted alimony for altering and forging medical records. With respect to doctors' obligations to description, the Supreme Court decided that it is necessary to explain the foreseen risks by the combination of oriental and western medicines emphasizing the right of patient's self-determination. However, questions have arisen whether it is realistically feasible or not. In a case of an unlicensed doctor performing intramuscular stimulation treatment (IMS), the Supreme Court put off its decision if it was an unlicensed medical practice as to put limitation of eastern and western medical practices, but it declared that IMS practice was an acupuncture treatment therefore the plaintiff's conduct being an illegal act. In the future, clear judgment on this matter should be made. With respect to the claim of bills from non-physical health care institutions, the Supreme Court decided to void it for the implementation of the arrangement is contrary to the commitments made in the medical law and therefore, it is invalid to claim. In addition, contrast to the private healthcare professionals, who are subject to redemption according to the National Healthcare Insurance Law, the Seoul High Court explicitly confirmed that the non-professionals who receive the tort operating profit must return the unjust enrichment and have the liability for damages. As mentioned above, a relatively wide range of topics were discussed in medical field of 2011. In Korea's health care environment undergoing complex changes day by day, it is expected to see more diverse and in-depth discussions striding out to the development in the field of health care.

  • PDF