• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제9권8호
• /
• pp.145-155
• /
• 2022

Since 2014, the IFRS 9 has been the focus of the attention of many scholars across disciplines. The futuristic prediction of bank loan provision via a flexible ECL model has been observed as a game changer from the prior models offered in IAS 39. This study has two objectives; the first is to examine the impact on loan loss provisions (LLP), nonperforming loans (NPL), and the impairment loan losses (ILL) after the IFRS 9 in gulf banks. The second is to capture any variation in LLP, NPL, and ILL before and after IFRS9. The study used the two-way fixed effect model (TWFE) estimation and the DiD approach to attain its objectives. 54 gulf banks were selected from the periods between 2012 and 2020. The results indicate that LLP has significantly increased after the transition to IFRS 9, while the NPL has significantly decreased. The results did not capture a significant change in ILL after IFRS9 implementation. The results also indicate more consistency in LLP and NPL reporting after implementing the ECL model adopted in IFRS9. The study concluded that ECL model outcomes are in tandem with prior observation worldwide and pointed out some improvement opportunities for the future.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제18권5호
• /
• pp.5-13
• /
• 2020

Purpose: The aim of this article is to test the link between growth of loan distribution and Bank Valuation in Vietnam's banking sector. At the same time, the study also compared the differences in the effect of growth of loan to valuation bank in banks of different sizes, ownership rates and bank values. Research design, data and methodology: With panel data estimation techniques along with robust standard error for a sample of the banks listed on Vietnam stock exchange from 2012 to 2019. Results: Growth of loan has a positive impact on Bank Valuation (by Tobin's Q). A closer investigation provides evidence for the differential valuation effect of loan growth depending on different features of banks. Specifically, loan growth is found positively and significantly associated with Bank Valuation in small and non-state-owned banks only. Besides, bank size, deposit, and return on equity are found negatively associated with Tobin's Q, while loan loss provisions exhibit a positive relation with this measure of Bank Valuation. Conclusions: These findings provide contributions to the literature on the existence of the effect of loan growth on Bank Valuation. At the same time, the study also provides practical implications for policy makers in banks and investors.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권9호
• /
• pp.105-115
• /
• 2020

The study empirically examines the effects of loan portfolio diversification on bank risk and return in the nascent banking market of Vietnam. Loan portfolio diversification is captured through the Hirschman-Herfindahl index and the Shannon Entropy with sectoral exposures. We access each bank's financial reports to collect the required data, especially the breakdown of sectoral loan portfolios, thus constituting a unique dataset. To compute bank return, we use the traditional accounting indicators, including return-on-assets, return-on-equity, and net-interest margin. For bank risk, we utilize the loan-loss provisions and non-performing loans relative to gross customer loans. Using a sample of 30 commercial banks over the period from 2008 to 2019 and the system generalized method of moments estimator for the dynamic panel, we indicate the downsides of portfolio diversification. Concretely, we observe that all diversification measures exhibit significantly negative signs in all regressions across different bank return proxies. At the same time, the estimates display the significant and positive impact of diversification on the non-performing loan ratio. Hence, sectoral loan portfolio diversification significantly hampers bank performance in both aspects of lower return and higher credit risk. The results are robust across a rich set of bank performance and portfolio diversification measures.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권3호
• /
• pp.127-135
• /
• 2020

The paper aims to examine whether business cycles affect the link between financial development and bank risk, measured by Zscore and non-performing loans to total loans in six Southeast Asian countries, namely Indonesia, Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. This study uses a sample of 95 listed commercial banks over a 15-year period between 2004 and 2018 in the six Southeast Asian countries. This study employs panel OLS regression and modifications to tackle issues such as endogeneity and heteroscedasticity. The results show that the impact of stock market development (the ratio of the market capitalization to GDP) on Zscore is significantly positive, whereas its effect on non-performing loans is significantly negative. The findings suggest that financial development, in terms of stock market capitalization, improves banks' Zscores and reduces their level of non-performing loans, suggesting that financial development on average reduces bank risk. The impact of business cycle is insignificant towards bank risk, thus rejecting both counter- and pro-cyclical hypotheses, except for the case of risk indicator of loan loss provisions. Examining the joint effect of the business cycle and financial development on bank risk, we find that the phase of business cycles generally does not moderate the link between financial development and bank risk.

• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.511-517
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 자본적정성 요구가 우리나라 은행의 수익성에 미치는 영향을 DOLS 모형을 이용하여 분석하였다. 분석 결과, BIS 자본비율이 시중은행과 지방은행에 미치는 영향이 상이하였다. 자본적정성 요구가 시중은행보다는 지방은행에 더 크고 유의한 부정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 거시경제변수보다는 은행특성변수들이 은행의 수익성에 더 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 BIS 자본비율이 상승하면 시중은행과 지방은행의 수익성이 감소하며, 대손충당금 비율이 높은 은행일수록 이러한 관계가 강화되는 것으로 나타났다. 일반적으로 시중은행의 경우에는 지방은행에 비해 상대적으로 규모도 크고 자본도 상대적으로 충실한 편이이서 자본적정성 요구가 크게 영향을 미치지 않은 것으로 추정된다. 그러나 지방은행의 경우에는 BIS 자본비율 충족을 위해서는 보다 안전한 자산을 선택할 필요가 있으며, 이러한 안전의 자산의 선택 비중이 증가함에 따라 수익성에 상대적으로 더 큰 부정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 보여 진다. 따라서 금융당국은 이러한 점을 고려하여 은행의 자본금 규제 정책을 시행하여야 할 것이다.