• Title/Summary/Keyword: Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry

Search Result 62, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Development of simultaneous analytical method for investigation of ketamine and dexmedetomidine in feed (사료 내 케타민과 덱스메데토미딘의 잔류조사를 위한 동시분석법 개발)

  • Chae, Hyun-young;Park, Hyejin;Seo, Hyung-Ju;Jang, Su-nyeong;Lee, Seung Hwa;Jeong, Min-Hee;Cho, Hyunjeong;Hong, Seong-Hee;Na, Tae Woong
    • Analytical Science and Technology
    • /
    • v.35 no.3
    • /
    • pp.136-142
    • /
    • 2022
  • According to media reports, the carcasses of euthanized abandoned dogs were processed at high temperature and pressure to make powder, and then used as feed materials (meat and bone meal), raising the possibility of residuals in the feed of the anesthetic ketamine and dexmedetomidine used for euthanasia. Therefore, a simultaneous analysis method using QuEChERS combined with high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry was developed for rapid residue analysis. The method developed in this study exhibited linearity of 0.999 and higher. Selectivity was evaluated by analyzing blank and spiked samples at the limit of quantification. The MRM chromatograms of blank samples were compared with those of spiked samples with the analyte, and there were no interferences at the respective retention times of ketamine and dexmedetomidine. The detection and quantitation limits of the instrument were 0.6 ㎍/L and 2 ㎍/L, respectively. The limit of quantitation for the method was 10 ㎍/kg. The results of the recovery test on meat and bone meal, meat meal, and pet food showed ketamine in the range of 80.48-98.63 % with less than 5.00 % RSD, and dexmedetomidine in the range of 72.75-93.00 % with less than 4.83 % RSD. As a result of collecting and analyzing six feeds, such as meat and bone meal, prepared at the time the raw material was distributed, 10.8 ㎍/kg of ketamine was detected in one sample of meat and bone meal, while dexmedetomidine was found to have a concentration below the limit of quantitation. It was confirmed that the detected sample was distributed before the safety issue was known, and thereafter, all the meat and bone meal made with the carcasses of euthanized abandoned dogs was recalled and completely discarded. To ensure the safety of the meat and bone meal, 32 samples of the meat and bone meal as well as compound feed were collected, and additional residue investigations were conducted for ketamine and dexmedetomidine. As a result of the analysis, no component was detected. However, through this investigation, it was confirmed that some animal drugs, such as anesthetics, can remain without decomposition even at high temperature and pressure; therefore, there is a need for further investigation of other potentially hazardous substances not controlled in the feed.

Method Development for Determination of Chlorogenic Acid and Arbutin Contents in Fruits by UHPLC-MS/MS (UHPLC-MS/MS를 이용한 과일류 중 클로로젠산 및 알부틴 동시분석법 개발)

  • Choi, Young-Ju;Jeon, Jong-Sup;Kim, Woon-Ho;Jung, You-Jung;Ryu, Ji-Eun;Choi, Jong-Chul;Chae, Kyung-Suk;Lee, Jin-Hee;Do, Young-Sook;Park, Young-Bae;Yoon, Mi-Hye
    • Journal of Food Hygiene and Safety
    • /
    • v.34 no.5
    • /
    • pp.413-420
    • /
    • 2019
  • In this study, a sample preparation method and a simultaneous determination method by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry for 9 isomers of chlorogenic acid and arbutin in fruits were developed. The samples were extracted using 90% methanol (pH 3.0), with the solutions being shaken and then sonicated for 10 min each. After centrifugation at 4,000 rpm for 10 min, the extraction was concentrated under a vacuum at $40^{\circ}C$ using a vacuum evaporator. The residue was dissolved in 5 mL of 5% methanol and filtered through a $0.45{\mu}m$ membrane before UHPLC-MS/MS analysis. The separations were performed on a C18 column with gradient elution of water (containing 0.1% formic acid) and methanol (containing 0.1% formic acid). The specificity, linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantification, accuracy, and precision of the proposed methods were also evaluated.