• Title/Summary/Keyword: Ligament fixation

Search Result 120, Processing Time 0.024 seconds

The Delayed Inflammatory Reaction after Anterior Cruciate Lligament Reconstruction with a Bioabsorbable Interference Screw Fixation - A Case Report - (생분해성 간섭나사를 이용한 전방십자인대 재건술 후 발생한 지연성 염증반응 - 증례 보고 -)

  • Lim, Hong-Chul;Noh, Kyoung-Sun;Yang, Jae-Hyuk
    • Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
    • /
    • v.10 no.1
    • /
    • pp.87-90
    • /
    • 2006
  • The complication caused by a bioabsorbable interference screw is rare after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. We report a case of delayed inflammatory reaction at the tibial tunnel and femoral tunnel where the graft tendon had been fixed with a bioabsorbable interference screw ($Bioscrew^{(R)}$) for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft.

  • PDF

Pretibial Ganglion after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Bioabsorbable Interference Screw fixation $(Bioscrew^{\circledR})$ - A Case Report - (생분해성 간섭나사를 이용한 전방 십자 인대 재건술 후 발생한 결절종 - 증례보고 -)

  • Song, Eun-Kyoo;Shim, Sang-Don;Kim, Myung-Sun
    • Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
    • /
    • v.6 no.2
    • /
    • pp.188-191
    • /
    • 2002
  • The complication caused by a bioabsorbable interference screw composed of Poly-L-Lactic-Acid is rare after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We reported a case of a pretibial ganglion at the orifice of the tibial tunnel where the graft tendon had been fixed with a bioabsorbable interference screw $(Bioscrew^{\circledR})$ for ACL reconstruction using autogenous hamstring tendon. The patient was underwent ganglion excision and interference screw removal.

  • PDF

Pretibial cyst after Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Hamstring Autograft - A Case Report - (자가 슬괵근을 이용한 전방 십자 인대 재건술 후 발생한 전경골 낭종 - 증례 보고 -)

  • Seo, Seung-Suk;Kim, Chang-Wan;Ha, Dong-Jun;Jung, Hun-Jae
    • Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
    • /
    • v.13 no.1
    • /
    • pp.53-57
    • /
    • 2009
  • The pretibial cyst is a very rare complication after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. It occurs whatever kind of graft choice or kind of graft fixation method at tibial side. It have been known such as graft necrosis at tibial side, extra-articular leakage of joint fluid through tibial tunnel, foreign body reaction due to breakdown of the bioabsorbable screw and incomplete incorporation of graft to bony tunnel as the cause of pretibial cyst. We experienced one case of pretibial cyst which had undergone ACL reconstruction with autogenous hamstring graft fixed with biodegradable interference screw. We report a rare case of pretibial cyst with literature review.

  • PDF

Pretibial Cyst after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using bio-absorbable interference screw fixation - A Case Report - (생체분해성간섭나사를 이용한 전방십자인대 재건술 후 발생한 경골 근위부 낭종-증례 보고-)

  • Chun, Keun Churl;Kim, Jung Woo;Kim, Tae Kuyn;Chun, Churl Hong
    • Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
    • /
    • v.11 no.1
    • /
    • pp.57-61
    • /
    • 2012
  • Pretibial cyst formation is a rare complication after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and there are only few cases reported. Pretibial cyst can be caused by variable reasons. Foreign body reaction due to breakdown of bio-absorbable screw for fixation, graft necrosis at tibial site, joint fluid leakage to tunnel and incomplete incorporation of graft to bony tunnel. The authors experienced one case of massive pretibial cyst after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using bio-absorbable interference screw in 38-year-old male patient. Thus, authors report this rare case with literature view.

  • PDF

The Treatment of the Acromioclavicular Dislocation using the Modified Neviaser Method (변형된 Neviaser 술식을 이용한 견봉쇄골관절 탈구의 치료)

  • Han Su Il;Kim Joon Seok;Lee Young Kuk
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • v.4 no.1
    • /
    • pp.24-29
    • /
    • 2001
  • Purpose: To describe a technique of the modified Neviaser method and to evaluate the clinical outcome of the technique in the treatment of the complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation, Materials and Method: We evaluated 20 patients who were treated by a modified Neviaser method from June 1996 to January 1999, They were followed up for a minimum of two years. The operative technique includes fixation of the acromioclavicular joint, repair of coracoclavicular ligament and transfer of the anterolateral band of coracoacromial ligament. Results: The 20 patients were evaluated clinically using Kang's criteria. The satisfactory results obtained in 85%. The mean coracoclavicular interval ratio was decreased from 2.22 preoperatively to 1.07 postoperatively. At the time of two year follow-up, the mean ratio was 1.20. There was no definite complication such as re-dislocation of the joint. Conclusion: In above type 3 acromioclavicular dislocation, the modified Neviaser method provided the advantage of strong and stable fixation with a low complication rate. Therefore, it is thought to be one of the useful operative technique.

  • PDF

The Necessity of Coracoclavicular Ligament Repair in Open Reduction for the Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations (견봉 쇄골 관절 탈구의 관혈적 정복술시 오구 쇄골 인대 봉합의 필요성)

  • Kim, Eu-Gene;Shin, Hun-Kyu;Jeong, Haw-Jae;Choi, Jae-Yeol;Park, Se-Jin;Choi, Kyu-Bo;Lim, Jong-Jun
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • v.13 no.2
    • /
    • pp.194-201
    • /
    • 2010
  • Purpose: We evaluated clinical and radiological results for open reduction and internal fixation of acromioclavicular dislocation without coracoclavicular ligament repair after removal of implants. Materials and methods: Clinical and radiological results were obtained for 53 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of an acromioclavicular joint dislocation between 1998 and 2007. A total of 21 patients were treated with a modified-Phemister method and 32 patients were treated with a Hook plate method. All subjects were surveyed after removal of their implants. The Constant scoring system was administered postoperatively to evaluate clinical results. Radiologic outcomes were evaluated by both coracoclavicular intervals on plain films. Results: Constant scores were $87.59{\pm}7.8$ in the Phemister group and $89.35{\pm}5.3$ in the Hook plate group. For both groups, the mean coracoclavicular interval at preoperative radiography was 15.9 mm at the injured site and 8.0 mm at the opposite site. After metal removal, the mean difference between coracoclavicular distances between normal and injured sites were 1.0 mm for the Hook plate group and 1.2 mm for the modified Phemister method group (p>0.05). Conclusion: Open reduction and internal fixation of an acromioclavicular joint without coracoclavicular ligament repair shows good long-term clinical and radiological results.

Graft Considerations for Successful Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (성공적인 전방십자인대 재건술을 위한 적절한 이식건의 선택)

  • Kyung, Hee-Soo
    • Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
    • /
    • v.56 no.1
    • /
    • pp.14-25
    • /
    • 2021
  • Several factors need to be considered for a successful anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, such as preoperative planning, operation technique, and postoperative rehabilitation. Graft choice, fixation, preparation method, maturation, incorporation to host bone, and graft tension should also be considered to achieve a good outcome after an ACL reconstruction. Factors to consider when selecting a graft are the graft strength, graft fixation, fixation site healing, and donor site morbidity, as well as the effects of initial strength, size, surface area, and origin of the graft on its potential for weakening during healing. There are two types of graft for an ACL reconstruction, autograft or allograft. Several autografts have been introduced, including the bone-patellar tendon-bone, hamstring tendon, and quadriceps tendon-bone. On the other hand, each has its advantages and disadvantages. The recent increased use of allografts for an ACL reconstruction is the lack of donor site morbidity, decreased surgical time, diminished postoperative pain, and good availability of source. Despite this, there are no reports suggesting that an allograft may have a better long-term outcome than an autograft. Allografts have inherent disadvantages, including a longer and less complete course of incorporation, remodeling, biomechanically inferiority to autograft, the potential risk of an immunogenic reaction and disease transmission. Higher long-term failure rates and poorer graft maturation scores were reported for allografts compared to autografts. An autograft in an ACL reconstruction should remain the gold standard, although the allograft is a reasonable alternative. If adequate length and diameter of autograft can be obtained for an ACL reconstruction, an autograft with adequate graft fixation and postoperative rehabilitation should be chosen instead of an allograft to achieve better results.