• Title/Summary/Keyword: Lawsuit

Search Result 148, Processing Time 0.029 seconds

Analysis by Defensive Process Prerequisite and Offensive Cause of Action on the Merits of Lawsuit Cases in Urban and Housing Redevelopment - Based on Affirm-Rate and Staircase Matrix Tables - (도시정비사건 소송의 본안전항변사유와 본안쟁점사항에 관한 분석 - 인용률 및 행렬표식 분석기법을 활용한 -)

  • Kim, Yohan;Jung, Boseon;Lee, Sangyoub
    • Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • /
    • v.20 no.5
    • /
    • pp.104-114
    • /
    • 2019
  • This study explored to analyze the winning determinants of the lawsuit cases on the urban and housing redevelopment project based on jurimetric methods. Based on affirm-rate and staircase matrix tables, 441 lawsuit judgments are analyzed. Research findings in affirm-rate analysis indicate that past legal relation, no own defect of accreditation, no ownership or association member status, lapse of period of litigation, and no legal interest are identified as higher rate in order for the reason for plea on the merit. And so are defect on calculation of consent rate, defect in relation with written consent, approval before zoning designation, defect in relation with general meeting, and defect on zoning designation for the issue on the merit. It is noteworthy from the staircase matrix table analysis that the criteria for affecting the lawsuit outcome is determined based on key forecasting variables such as past legal relation and no ownership or association member status. This study intends to provide the implication that the unnecessary disputes can be reduced in the urban and housing redevelopment project by the implementation of jurimetric quantitative analysis methodology from the perspective of empirical law.

A Study on the Improvement of Capital Gains Tax Act through the Analysis of the Precedents of the cases of the lawsuit - Focusing on the transfer of inherited and donated property - (행정소송판례 검토를 통한 양도소득세법 개선방안 - 상속·증여받은 자산의 양도를 중심으로 -)

  • Yu, Soon-Mi;Kim, Hye-Ri
    • Management & Information Systems Review
    • /
    • v.38 no.4
    • /
    • pp.61-78
    • /
    • 2019
  • When calculating gains from transfers of assets inherited or donated, the value recognized at the market price as of the date of inheritance or acquisition is recognized as the actual transaction value at the time of acquisition. However, Precedents for the appeal for review by the NTS, the request for adjudgment by the Tax Tribunal(TT) and the request of examination by the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea(BAI) and the cases of the lawsuit have not shown a consistent results on how much such a the actual transaction value will be measured. This study investigates the operating state of the current tax appeal system using the statistical data of the TT, NTS, and BAI and cases of the lawsuit from 2008 to 2017, and suggests the Improvement of Capital Gains Tax Act on the transfer of inherited and donated property. As a result, total number of requested cases has diminished because cases of the pre-assessment review and the reconsideration appeal by the NTS have decreased steadily over the past decade, while the cases of the lawsuit and the administrative trials(the request for adjudgment by the TT, the appeal for review by the NTS, and the request of examination by the BAI) have been steadily increasing. Also This study found that more than 40% of the complainants proceeded with the cases of the lawsuit proceedings in disagreement with the disposition of tax dissatisfaction under the administrative trials. In addition, Even though the retrospective appraisal price is not recognized as the market price due to the strict interpretation of the tax regulations, it can be seen that it is interpreted as a more expanded concept in the application of the market price than the government office or the tax judge. Therefore, according to the precedents of the cases lawsuit, it is necessary to establish a regulation on the recognition of retroactive appraisal value.

Analysis of TRIZ and SIT Thinking Tool Utilization of Valuable Patents: Focused on the Patent Infringement Lawsuit Filed by Nokia (가치 있는 특허의 TRIZ 발명원리와 SIT 활용도 분석: 노키아 소송 특허를 중심으로)

  • Im, Yoywang
    • Journal of Engineering Education Research
    • /
    • v.23 no.4
    • /
    • pp.52-65
    • /
    • 2020
  • This study aims to find the major creative ideation patterns embedded in the commercially valuable patents in the mobile communication industry. For the purpose, we analyze 171 cases of the patent infringement lawsuit filed by Nokia in the United States. It is examined that what kind of TRIZ inventive principles and SIT thinking tools were applied to resolve technical contractions in each of the 171 cases respectively. Among the 40 inventive principles of TRIZ, 'feedback' principle was used mostly and 'division' principle the next. Among the 5 thinking tools of SIT, 'attribute dependency' mostly used, and 'division' the next. This suggests that what kind of inventive principles or thinking tools should be considered preferentially to resolve technical contradictions in practically important technical problems in the mobile communication industry.

A Study on the Term of Warranty Liability by the Law-suit Requesting of the Guarantee against Defects in the Apartment Building (공동주택 하자보증금 청구소송에 의한 하자담보책임기간 연구)

  • Koo, Hae-Shik
    • KIEAE Journal
    • /
    • v.12 no.3
    • /
    • pp.11-18
    • /
    • 2012
  • The purpose of this study is to contribute to solution of the defect dispute in apartment house in advance. We want to propose the improved devices in defect problems by investigating the money that exacted from the practical business of the inspection company and the money that a judge gave a decision in a civil court in 50 cases of the lawsuit to requesting the guarantee against defects and the improved schemes of the applied rate by analyzing the diagnosis money of each applied years about the term of warranty liability in 40 cases of the lawsuit separately from that. As the result, we have to reflect the defect of non construction and error construction on apartment building defects, which recognizes very important factor when we compute the defect repair warranty money and it needs to be rearranged the applied ratio in guarantee peried of housing law practically.

Comparative Analysis on Repairing Cost of Lawsuit on Concrete Crack Defect in Apartment Building (공동주택 하자소송의 균열하자보수비 비교.분석 연구)

  • Kim, Beop-Su;Park, Jun-Mo;Choi, Jeong-Hyun;Seo, Deok-Seok;Kim, Ok-Kyue
    • Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • /
    • v.12 no.6
    • /
    • pp.142-150
    • /
    • 2011
  • Defect dispute has been increasing to claim by condominium, in increasing to demand and concern in value, quality, and management of apartment building since 2000s. In this study, for checking property of cost in crack issue with precedure of lawsuit on defect, it is analyzing details about repairing cost of concrete crack defect that formed 77 percent of repairing cost. Futhermore, it is studying of composition of repairing cost and difference of repairing cost by repairing method. This is checking details that cost growth has a difference whether court accept a acceptable range of crack width, and repairing method and reinforcement work has to choose between a surface treatment method, a filling method and a injecting method. Meanwhile, it is considerable that disparity of repairing cost whether is a method of painting work.

Analysis on the Factors affecting the Ruling on Construction Project Litigation - Focused on the Union Establishment of the Urban and Housing Redevelopment Project - (건설사업의 소송판결에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구 - 도시정비사업 조합설립인가 사건을 중심으로 -)

  • Kim, Yohan;Jung, Boseon;Lee, Sangyoub
    • Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • /
    • v.21 no.1
    • /
    • pp.40-49
    • /
    • 2020
  • This study analyzed the factors affecting the ruling of litigation on the housing reconstruction and housing redevelopment project based on the cross analysis and logistic regression analysis. According to cross analysis result, the defensive process prerequisite group was showed significant in many variables which were past legal relation, no ownership or association member status, double lawsuit, abuse of lawsuit right·litigation trust, existence of claim-preclusion, no standing to sue·no standing to be sued, lapse of litigation period, no legal interest, no own defect of approval. On the other hand, the offensive cause of action group was found to have no significant variable. According to logistic regression result, the defensive process prerequisite group was showed significant in many variables which were past legal relation, no standing to sue·no standing to be sued, no ownership or association member status, double lawsuit, no own defect of approval, abuse of lawsuit right·litigation trust, existence of claim-preclusion. Meanwhile, the offensive cause of action group was showed significant in only one variable that was defect in relation with articles of association. Overall, it is noteworthy that the offensive cause group showed very low significant results compared with the defensive process prerequisite group.

A Case Study on the Investor-State Dispute Relevant a Public Policy and the Domestic Implications (공공정책 관련 ISD 소송의 국내적 시사점 연구 -우리나라 관련 ISD사건을 중심으로-)

  • Kim, In-Sook
    • Journal of Legislation Research
    • /
    • no.55
    • /
    • pp.193-237
    • /
    • 2018
  • The recent surge in the ISD lawsuit filed against the Korean government is likely to cause major domestic confusion. This is because in most cases, foreign investors have claimed billions of won in damages filed against Korea in the ISD lawsuit. Public opinion will be generated to abolish the ISD lawsuit system, which is included in the international investment agreement, when a decision comes out in the Elliott/Mason case or Lone Star case, which has already been completed by the hearing. It is clear that the ISD clause, which is commonly included in most of the BITs, FTAs, can be a limiting factor in the government's public policy, as shown by many investment disputes. However, it is not necessary to have a negative view of the ISD clause itself, given that it is a system that can protect Korean investors from illegal and inappropriate actions by local governments. Since Korea already allows the system of ISD lawsuits with many countries through FTAs and BITs, and negotiations are underway to sign FTAs with new countries, the possibility that foreign investors will refer to the ISD proceeding further to our government's public policy will increase. In order to prepare for an ISD lawsuit, the Korean government has launched a response team consisting of government practitioners, private scholars, and legal professionals in the central government ministries to review major legal issues that are controversial in the cases of the ISD. In particular, local governments and public institutions, which fail to recognize the importance of international investment regulations and ISD clause, need to share and train relevant information so that all processes for public policy planning and implementation comply with international investment rules such as BITs and FTAs.

The Defect Diagnosis Process Model Utilizing BPMN Modeling Method in the Apartment Housing (BPMN 모델링 방식을 활용한 공동주택 하자진단 업무프로세스 모델)

  • Jung, Ryeo-Won;Kim, Kyung-Hwan;Lee, Jeong-Seok;Kim, Jae-Jun
    • Journal of the Korean housing association
    • /
    • v.26 no.2
    • /
    • pp.67-79
    • /
    • 2015
  • As the Korean construction market in the apartment housing has changed to a housing consumer focused market, interest and importance on efficient use and management on existing buildings has increased rather than demand for new buildings. Interest of housing consumers on apartment house quality has increased in this market paradigm, and this spontaneously is connected to quality flaw related defect disputes and lawsuits that the importance of defect diagnosis has continuously increased. This defect diagnosis is directly connected to maintenance charges in defect dispute and lawsuit processes that rather objective and highly credible progress of duty is required. However, most defect diagnosis firms today that progress defect diagnosis are using different diagnosis methods and depend on the experience of experienced professionals that there is no standardized defect diagnosis process. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to provide common defect diagnosis process model for defect diagnosis firms utilizing the BPMN (Business Process Modeling Notation) modeling method. It is expected that this will contribute to professional and reliable task performances of concerned defect diagnosis workers. Furthermore, it is expected that design lawsuit damage will be substantially reduced by standardizing defect diagnosis processes.