• Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.160-167
• /
• 2018

Purpose: The aim of our study was to present an abdominal wall closure technique using barbed suture $V-Loc^{TM}$ 90 after single incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) and to compare perioperative outcomes with conventional layer by layer abdominal wall closure after SILA. Methods: From March 2014 to July 2016, a retrospective case-control study was conducted for a total of 269 consecutive patients who underwent SILA. According to abdominal wall closure methods, 129 patients were classified into the V-Loc closure group and 140 patients were assigned into the conventional layer by layer closure group. In the V-Loc group, abdominal wall closure was performed from the fascia to the skin with a single thread of unidirectional absorbable barbed suture $V-Loc^{TM}$ 90 2-0 using continuous running suture and reverse overlapping reinforced running technique. Subcutaneous closure and subcuticular suture were performed with the remaining portion of V-Loc. Results: The V-Loc closure group showed shorter total operation time ($40.0{\pm}15.4min$ vs. $44.9{\pm}16.3min$, p=0.013) and abdominal wall cusing continuous running suture and reverse overlapping reinforced running technique. Subcutaneous closure and subcuticular suture were performed with the remaining portion of V-Loc. Results: The V-Loc closure group showed shorter total operation time losure time ($5.5{\pm}0.9min$ vs. $6.5{\pm}0.8min$, p<0.001). Postoperative incision length was significantly shorter in the V-Loc closure group ($1.1{\pm}0.3cm$ vs. $1.8{\pm}0.4cm$, p<0.001). Postoperative wound pain, time to resume diet, postoperative hospital stay, complications including surgical site infection, or mean patient satisfaction score at one month after hospital discharge was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: In conclusion, unidirectional knotless barbed suture is a safe alternative method for abdominal wall closure after SILA. It can save time while providing comparable cosmesis.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.93-102
• /
• 2021

Purpose: With advances in surgical techniques, reduced-port laparoscopic surgery is increasingly being performed for the treatment of gastric carcinoma. Many studies have reported satisfactory short-term outcomes after reduced 3-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term oncological outcomes of 3-port LG in patients with gastric carcinoma. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 1,117 patients who underwent LG for gastric carcinoma in three major institutions between 2012 and 2015. The data showed that 460 patients underwent 3-port LG without assistance, and 657 underwent conventional 5-port LG. We compared the overall and disease-free survival rates between the 2 groups. Results: There were 642 male and 475 female patients with a mean age of 56.1 years. Among them, 1,028 (92.0%) underwent distal gastrectomy and 89 (8.0%) underwent total gastrectomy. In the final pathologic examination, 1,027 patients (91.9%) were stage I, 73 (6.5%) were stage II, and 17 (1.5%) were stage III, and there were no significant difference in the pathologic stage between groups. The 3- and 5-port LG groups showed no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival (94.3% vs. 96.7%, P=0.138) or disease-free survival (94.3% vs. 95.9%, P=0.231). Stratified analyses according to pT and pN stages also showed no significant differences in overall or disease-free survival between the two groups. Conclusions: Long-term survival after 3- and 5-port LG was comparable in patients with early-stage gastric carcinoma. The 3-port technique requiring limited surgical assistance may be an appropriate surgical option for this patient population.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.135-144
• /
• 2022

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes between totally laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (TLPPG) with intracorporeal anastomosis and laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LAPPG) with extracorporeal anastomosis. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 258 patients with cT1N0 gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy using two different anastomosis methods: TLPPG with intracorporeal anastomosis (n=88) and LAPPG with extracorporeal anastomosis (n=170). The following variables were compared between the two groups to assess the postoperative surgical and oncological outcomes: proximal and distal margins, number of resected lymph nodes (LNs) in total and in LN station 6, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity including delayed gastric emptying (DGE). Results: The average length of the proximal margin was similar between the TLPPG and LAPPG groups (2.35 vs. 2.73 cm, P=0.070). Although the distal margin was significantly shorter in the TLPPG group than in the LAPPG group (3.15 vs. 4.08 cm, P=0.001), no proximal or distal resection margin-positive cases were reported in either group. The average number of resected LN was similar in both groups (36.0 vs. 33.98, P=0.229; LN station 6, 5.72 vs. 5.33, P=0.399). The operation time was shorter in the TLPPG group than in the LAPPG (200.17 vs. 220.80 minutes, P=0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of postoperative hospital stay (9.38 vs. 10.10 days, P=0.426) and surgical complication rate (19.3% vs. 22.9%), including DGE (8.0% vs. 11.8%, P=0.343). Conclusions: The oncological safety and postoperative complications of TLPPG with intracorporeal anastomosis are similar to those of LAPPG with extracorporeal anastomosis.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.94-106
• /
• 2022

Purpose: Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (LPG-DTR) is a function-preserving procedure performed for treating upper early gastric cancer (EGC). However, few studies have compared the outcomes of LPG-DTR with those of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). This study aimed at comparing the short-term outcomes of LPG-DTR between LTG and upper EGC. Materials and Methods: For upper-third EGC, a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial was performed to compare those who underwent LPG-DTR with those who underwent LTG. Short-term outcomes, including clinicopathologic results, morbidity, mortality, and postoperative courses, were evaluated using a full analysis set based on the intention-to-treat principle and the per-protocol set. Results: Of the patients, 138 who fulfilled the criteria were randomized to each group. One patient in the LPG-DTR group withdrew consent. Sixty-eight patients underwent LPG-DTR and 69 underwent LTG. The operative time (LPG-DTR=219.4 minutes; LTG=201.8 minutes; P=0.085), estimated blood loss (LPG-DTR=76.0 mL; LTG=66.1 mL; P=0.413), and the morbidity rate (LPG-DTR=23.5%; LTG=17.4%; P=0.373) between the groups were not significantly different. No mortality occurred in either of the study groups. Two weeks post operation, the Visick scores for postprandial symptoms, including reflux symptoms, were not significantly different between the groups (P=0.749). Laboratory findings on postoperative day 5 were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusions: The short-term outcomes of LPG-DTR for upper EGC were comparable to those of LTG.

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• 제23권6호
• /
• pp.615-624
• /
• 2022

Objective: To compare the therapeutic outcomes of laparoscopic hepatic resection (LHR) and laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) for single subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods: We screened 244 consecutive patients who had received either LHR or LRFA between January 2014 and December 2016. The feasibility of LRFA in patients who underwent LHR was retrospectively assessed by two interventional radiologists. Finally, 60 LRFA-feasible patients who had received LHR and 29 patients who had received LRFA as the first treatment for a solitary subcapsular HCC between 1 cm and 3 cm were finally included. We compared the therapeutic outcomes, including local tumor progression (LTP), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) between the two groups before and after propensity score (PS) matching. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was also used to evaluate the difference in OS and RFS between the two groups for all 89 patients. Results: PS matching yielded 23 patients in each group. The cumulative LTP and OS rates were not significantly different between the LHR and LRFA groups after PS matching (p = 0.900 and 0.003, respectively). The 5-year LTP rates were 4.6% and 4.4%, respectively, and OS rates were 100% and 90.7%, respectively. The RFS rate was higher in LHR group without statistical significance (p = 0.070), with 5-year rates of 78.3% and 45.3%, respectively. OS was not significantly different between the LHR (reference) and LRFA groups in multivariable analyses, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.12-1.54) (p = 0.818). RFS was higher in LHR (reference) than in LRFA without statistical significance in multivariable analysis, with an HR of 2.01 (0.87-4.66) (p = 0.102). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in therapeutic outcomes between LHR and LRFA for single subcapsular HCCs measuring 1-3 cm. The difference in RFS should be further evaluated in a larger study.

• 대한영상의학회지
• /
• 제84권3호
• /
• pp.615-626
• /
• 2023

목적 악성대장협착에서 스텐트 설치 후 시행한 단단계 수술의 결과를 평가하고자 하였다. 대상과 방법 2009년 1월부터 2018년 1월까지, 악성대장협착으로 투시장치 하 스텐트를 설치하여 장세척을 한 후 수술을 시행한 46명의 환자(남:여 = 28:18, 평균 67.2세)를 대상으로 하였다. 그중 31명은 복강경수술, 15명은 개복수술을 시행하였으며, 수술 결과를 후향적으로 분석하였다. 평균 38.9개월의 추적관찰 기간 동안, 무재발생존율과 전체생존율을 구하였고, 예후인자를 알아보았다. 결과 스텐트 설치 후 평균 10.2일 후에 수술을 시행하였으며, 전례에서 성공적으로 스텐트를 포함한 종양 절제 후 문합이 가능하였다. 수술 후 평균 입원기간은 11일이었다. 6명의 환자(13%)에서 수술 중 혹은 수술 후 병리 소견에서 장천공이 관찰되었다. 추적 기간 동안 10명의 환자(21.7%)에서 종양이 재발하였으며, 장천공이 관찰되었던 6명의 환자 중 5명에서 재발이 발생하였다. 장천공은 무재발생존율에 유의미한 영향을 미쳤다(p = 0.010). 결론 악성대장협착에서 스텐트 설치 후 시행한 단단계 수술은 효과적인 치료 방법으로 생각된다. 스텐트와 연관된 장천공이 재발의 위험인자였다.

• 한국간담췌외과학회지
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.42-47
• /
• 2024

Backgrounds/Aims: Hepatolithiasis and choledocholithiasis are frequent pathologies and unfortunately, with the current treatment strategies, the recurrence incidence is still high. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of laparoscopic choledochotomy using cholangioscopy via the percutaneous-choledochal tube for the treatment of hepatolithiasis and choledocholithiasis in Vietnamese patients. Methods: A cross-sectional study of patients with hepatolithiasis and/or choledocholithiasis who underwent laparoscopic choledochotomy using intraoperative cholangioscopy via percutaneous-choledochal tube at the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, 108 Military Central Hospital, from June 2017 to March 2020. Results: A total of 84 patients were analyzed. Most patients were females (56.0%) with a median age of 55.56 years. Among them, 41.8% of patients had previous abdominal operations, with 33.4% having choledochotomy. All patients underwent successful laparoscopic common bile duct exploration followed by T-tube drainage without needing to convert to open surgery. Most patients (64.3%) had both intrahepatic and extrahepatic stones. The rate of stones ≥ 10 mm in diameter was 64.3%. Biliary strictures were observed in 19.1% of patients during cholangioscopy. Complete removal of stones was achieved in 54.8% of patients. Intraoperative complications were encountered in two patients, but there was no need to change the strategy. The mean operating time was 121.85 ± 30.47 minutes. The early postoperative complication rate was 9.6%, and all patients were managed conservatively. The residual stones were removed through the T-tube tract by subsequent choledochoscopy in 34/38 patients, so the total success rate was 95.2%. Conclusions: Laparoscopic choledochotomy combined with cholangioscopy through the percutaneous-choledochal tube is a safe and effective strategy for hepatolithiasis and/or choledocholithiasis, even in patients with a previous choledochotomy.

• Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.219-227
• /
• 2006

목 적: 자궁내막증이 체외 수정에 미치는 영향에 대하여 알아보고, 자궁내막증의 체외 수정 결과의 차이에 대해 살펴보고자 하였다. 연구방법: 1994년부터 2004년까지 제일병원 아이소망센타에서 자궁내막증으로 체외 수정을 시술 받은 697명의 환자 (총 1,199주기)를 후향적으로 연구하였다. 경증의 자궁내막증은 638주기, 중증의 자궁내막증은 561주기였으며, 난관 요인을 가진 325명 (459주기)를 대조군으로 하였다. 제외 기준으로는 여성의 나이가 35세 이상, basal FSH level이 20 mIU/ml 이상인 경우, 심각한 남성 요인의 경우를 제외하였다. 결 과: 중증의 자궁내막증은 난관 요인 보다 획득된 난자의 수 ($9.97{\pm}7.2$ vs. $13.4{\pm}7.9$ (p<0.0001)), 총 배아 수 ($6.5{\pm}4.8$ vs. $9.1{\pm}5.6$ (p<0.0001)), 양질의 배아 수 ($2.43{\pm}1.6$ vs. $2.74{\pm}1.7$ (p=0.013))가 통계적으로 유의하게 낮았다. 하지만, 중증의 자궁내막증의 임신율은 난관 요인과 유사하였다 (35.7 vs. 36.8 (%)). 경증의 자궁내막증은 중증의 자궁내막증과 난관 요인보다 불임 기간이 길었으며 ($55.4{\pm}25.7$ vs. $47.6{\pm}25.6$ vs. $44.4{\pm}30.9$ (개월) p<0.0001)), 수정률이 의미 있게 낮았으나 ($64.8{\pm}22.9$ vs. $69.9{\pm}22.5$ vs.$70.8{\pm}20.8$ (%) (p<0.0001)), 임신율에 유의한 차이는 없었다 (31.1 vs. 35.7 vs. 36.8 (%)). 또한, 체외 수성 이전에 치료 받은 병력이 있던 경증과 중증의 자궁내막증 (363주기 vs. 470주기)은 경증의 자궁내막증에서 중증의 자궁내막증보다 불임 기간이 길고 ($56.5{\pm}26.3$ vs. $46.9{\pm}25.8$ (개월), p<0.0001), 수정률이 낮았으며 ($64.7{\pm}23.3$ vs. $70.5{\pm}22.7$ (%), p=0.001), 임신율과 태아 생존율이 통계적으로 유의하게 낮았다 (29.2 vs. 36.2 (%), p=0.045, 23.9 vs. 31.5 (%), p=0.043). 결 론: 체외 수정 시 이전에 치료를 받았던 경증의 자궁내막증은 중증의 자궁내막증보다 임신율과 태아 생존율이 낮았고, 이는 현저한 수정률 감소와 긴 불임 기간이 관련이 있다고 생각된다. 따라서, 장기간의 불임 기간을 가진 경증의 자궁내막증을 가진 불임 여성은 체외 수정을 좀 더 일찍 고려해 볼 수 있겠다.

• Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics
• /
• 제45권4호
• /
• pp.466-472
• /
• 2002

목 적 : Meckel 게실은 장출혈, 장폐색, 감염, 천공등의 합병증에 의한 증상이 나타날 수 있으며 급성 복증을 일으키는 다른 질환과 감별진단이 어렵고 진단이 지연되기 쉽다. 저자들은 Meckel 게실 환자에서 임상증상과 조직학적 소견을 비교하여 신속히 진단하고 치료하는데 도움이 되고자 하였다. 방 법 : 1993년 10월부터 2001년 8월까지 이화의료원에서 진단한 Meckel 게실 10례의 의무기록을 후향적으로 조사하여 임상증상과 조직학적 소견 등을 분석하였다. 결 과 : 1) 환자의 연령은 7일-14세의 분포를 보였고, 6세 이전(60%)이 많았다. 남녀비는 2.3 : 1로 남아에서 많았다. 2) 주요증상은 무통성 하부 장출혈, 복통, 복부 팽만, 구토 순이었고 나이가 많을수록 증상이 심하였다. 3) 수술 전에 Meckel 게실로 진단되거나 의심되어 수술 한 경우 5례, 초음파 유도하 수압으로 정복되지 않은 장중첩증(3례)과 장폐색(2례)으로 수술하여 발견된 경우 5례이었다. 4) Meckel 스캔($^{99m}Tc-pertechnetate$)은 cimetidine을 투여한 후 6례에서 시행되었으며, 이소성 위점막이 있었던 5례 중 4례에서 양성, 1례 위음성, 이소성 위점막이 없었던 1례에서 음성이었다. 5) Meckel 게실은 회맹판으로부터 35-70 cm 상부에 있었고, 길이는 4-12 cm이었으며 이중 80%가 5cm 미만이었다. 6) 하부 장출혈이 있었던 5례 모두에서 이소성 위점막이 발견되었고, 그 외의 조직학적 소견은 염증 3례, 궤양 3례, 천공 1례, 출혈 3례, 경색 1례이었다. 결 론 : Meckel 게실은 출혈량이 적거나 증상이 경미한 환자에서 신속히 진단하게 되면 출혈이나 수혈의 빈도를 줄일 수 있으며 회복도 빠르므로, Meckel 게실을 염두에 두고 조영술이나 내시경에 우선하여 Meckel 스캔을 시행하는 것이 좋다. 이소성 위점막이 없는 Meckel 게실에서는 Meckel 스캔이 음성이므로 임상적으로 의심될 때에는 복강경, 컴퓨터 단층촬영, 고해상도 초음파촬영 등의 다양한 진단법이 시도되어야 할 것이다.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제4권4호
• /
• pp.230-234
• /
• 2004

목적: 최근 위 질환에서 복강경 사용이 증가하고 있는 추세이다. 그러나, 조기위암의 경우 그 적응증과 표준 술식에 대해서는 논란이 있어 왔다. 본 연구의 목적은 handassisted laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (HALDG), laparos-copy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG), 그리고 개복하 원위 위 절제술간의 임상적 결과의 비교를 통해 조기 위암에서 복강경 술기의 유용성을 알아보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2001년 8월부터 2004년 7월까지 본원에서 조기위암으로 진단받아 HALDG (=18)와 LADG (=7)를 시행한 25명의 환자들을 대상으로 하였으며, 같은 시기에 개복하 원위 위 절제술을 시행한 40명의 환자와 수술시간, 재원 기간, 식이 시작 시기, 절제된 림프절 수 등의 임상적 결과를 비교 분석하였다. 또한 수술 시기에 따라 HALDG와 LADG을 각각 전기와 후기로 분류하여 임상적 결과를 비교하였다. 결과: 복강경 군과 개복술 군 간의 절제된 림프절 수에는 차이가 없었으며, 수술 시간은 복강경 군에서 유의하게 길었다(P<0.05). 또한, 그 외 임상적 결과들에서도 두 군 간에 차이가 없었다. 전기와 후기의 비교에서 후기의 HALDG 군에서 비록 수술 시간의 증가는 있었으나 절제된 림프절 수는 $22.31\pm4.29$에서 $29.40\pm3.21$로 후기에서 유의하게 증가하였다(P<0.05). 결론: 복강경하 위절제술의 경험을 통해 D1+$\beta$ 이상의 림프절 절제가 가능하였고 술식의 안정성 등 조기위암에서도 복강경 술식이 적용될 수 있음을 알 수 있었다. 하지만, 술식의 표준화가 필요하며, 대규모 전향적 연구를 통해 복강경 술식에서도 개복술에서 보인 종양학적 근치성이 입증되어야 할 것이다.