• 한국화재소방학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국화재소방학회 2007년도 춘계학술논문발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.77-82
• /
• 2007

• 한국원자력학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국원자력학회 2004년도 추계학술발표회 발표논문집
• /
• pp.553-554
• /
• 2004

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제49권2호
• /
• pp.127-143
• /
• 2021

Purpose: Smart Safety Living Lab is a Living Lab facility, constructed and operated by KITECH in Korea, to support the user experience(UX) evaluation, planning and certification of smart safety products and services. The purpose of this study is to develop a UX evaluation methodology that accommodates the characteristics of the Living Lab and smart safety products and services for a systematic and efficient UX evaluation in the Smart Safety Living Lab. Methods: A generic model of UX evaluation was first derived based on a review of related literature. Then, the generic model is revised to accommodate the characteristics of the Smart Safety Living Lab and smart safety products and services, resulting in the UX Evaluation Methodology for Smart Safety Living Lab (SSLL-UXEM). Results: The developed SSLL-UXEM consists of a structured process for UX evaluation, a guideline for conducting each step of the process, and a set of forms for recording the major evaluation results in each step. Conclusion: SSLL-UXEM can help to enhance the efficiency of the UX evaluation process and the consistency of the UX evaluation results. SSLL-UXEM is also expected to serve as a basis for UX evaluation in various living lab environments in the future.

• 한국화재소방학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국화재소방학회 2007년도 춘계학술논문발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.83-88
• /
• 2007

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.127-133
• /
• 2012

This paper shows survey result on safety management status of laboratories in Korea. In Korea, many studies and reports on laboratory safety have been published since the ministry of education, science and technology (MEST) enforced the Act on Establishing a Safe Environment of Laboratories (Lab Safety Act) in 2006. The MEST has surveyed status of safety management in institutions subject to Lab Safety Act in 2008 and 2010. According to the survey result, safety management status of universities and colleges has been improved on several factors such as establishment of safety manual and implementation of safety inspection; while the number of safety managers of universities and colleges have increased. However, the difficulties in performing duties of safety managers has increased because the number of exclusive safety managers has decreased. This paper identifies the similarities and differences between Occupational Safety and Health Act and Lab Safety Act on assignment and duties of safety managers; therefore, this paper suggests a standard to determine the number of safety managers and decide whether or not their duties should be exclusive. Besides current standard that is based on the number of researchers, the number of individual laboratories should be considered. The new method would be helpful to determine the number of exclusive safety managers because the amount of safety managers' duties generally do not depend on only the number of people who may be exposed to any risk but also the number of facilities that may be cause of any accident.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제37권2호
• /
• pp.54-68
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study is to provide implications for improving the safety behavior of university lab students by grasping the relationship between leaders' safety leadership, the lab's safety climate, and individual safety motivation variables. To this end, a survey was conducted on nationwide university laboratories, and the main results are as follows. First, transformational and transactional safety leadership had a positive effect on safety behavior, while the laissez-faire one had a negative impact.Second, it was found that the laboratory safety climate plays a mediating role in the relationship in which safety leadership affects safety behavior. Third, it was found that individual safety motivation was governed by the laboratory safety climate's effect on safety behavior. Fourth, individual safety motivation was found to control the mediating effect of the laboratory safety climate in the relationship between safety leadership and safety behavior. The conclusion of this study is the following: to strengthen the safety behavior of university laboratory students, the laboratory manager must operate the laboratory with a transformational and transactional safety leadership. Additionally, educational institutions must effectively operate their own safety-day programs to create a safe climate for each laboratory and improve students' safety motives.

• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.99-108
• /
• 2020

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the regulatory systems for laboratory safety and health management between Korea and Germany and discuss the implications. Methods: Laboratory safety and health regulations for legal enforcement and relevant technical guidelines in Korea and Germany were reviewed. Results: Lab safety and health management is enforced by the Act on the Establishment of Safe Laboratory Environment in Korea. Most provisions focus on supervisory control, that is, the principal's liability is emphasized. In addition, there is a lack of laboratory-specific procedures for safety and health management in the act since it is stipulated that other relevant regulations apply to some technical contents. Non-compulsory technical guidelines for lab safety and health management are also provided by the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA) in order to enable researchers to follow safe procedures. There is no independent regulation for lab safety and health in Germany, and it is also governed by several regulations. The German Social Accident Insurance Institute provides technical guidelines on lab safety and health, and these contain more specific content to allow them to be followed more easily compared to the KOSHA guidelines. The most remarkable differences between the regulation of each country were contents of the risk assessment and specific protect measures from hazardous agents. Conclusions: Regulatory control is an essential way to prevent accidents, but it is more important to create an environment in which all stakeholders, including individual lab members, are allowed to participate actively in safety and health management activities.

• 한국화재소방학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국화재소방학회 2007년도 춘계학술논문발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.72-76
• /
• 2007

• 한국식품위생안전성학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국식품위생안전성학회 2001년도 The Asia-Pacific Conference on Reproductive Biology and Environmental Sciences
• /
• pp.264-266
• /
• 2001

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.858-864
• /
• 2011

대학 연구기관 등의 연구실험실에서 감전, 전기화재 등 전기사고를 방지하고 안전을 확보하기위해 수행하는 전기분야 정기점검/정밀안전진단은 구체적인 기술적 표준모델이 없는 실정이다. 특히 전기분야 연구실에 대한 정기점검/정밀안전진단 관련 연구는 매우 취약한 상태로서 이에 대한 대책마련이 시급하다. 이에 대한 문제점을 파악하고 명확한 기준이 없는 점검항목, 점검방법, 필수 활용장비, 안전등급부여방법 등에 대한 구체적인 기준을 마련하였다. 또한, 기존 연구실험실의 전기전자분야 체크리스트를 검토, 분석하여 체크리스트개발연구를 수행하였다. 연구실험실에 실제 효율적으로 적용 가능하도록 구체적인 기준을 마련하여, 제시함으로서 전기안전 취약요인을 개선하도록 체계적이고 효율적인 표준모델을 제시하였다. 본 연구에서 개발된 전기분야 표준모델은 실제 필요한 점검항목에 대한 명확한 기준을 설정하여 모든 연구실에 공통으로 적용할 수 있도록 개발하여 정기점검과 정밀안전진단 수행 시 바로 실행 가능하도록 하였다. 이는 연구실의 전기사고방지를 위한 효율적인 점검뿐만 아니라, 연구실안전수준을 전반적으로 상승시킬 것이다.