• Title/Summary/Keyword: Kamsarmax

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.013 seconds

Structural Strength Assessment of Forward Cargo Hold for Kamsarmax CSR Bulk Carrier (Kamsarmax급 CSR Bulk Carrier의 Forward Cargo Hold 구조적 특성 및 안정성 검증)

  • Hwang, Sang-Wook;Park, Jeong-Jun
    • Special Issue of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea
    • /
    • 2011.09a
    • /
    • pp.17-20
    • /
    • 2011
  • The International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) had developed the Common Structural Rules (CSR) for bulk carriers as per the needs noted above. ISO and IMO GBS (Goal-Based Standards) are now being developed in this regard. This study has been prepared to verity the strength of forward cargo hold of 82,000 DWT class bulk carriers. A cargo hold/tank 3-D FE model was established to assess the structural adequacy of the primary structural members with the loading conditions. Full breadth model was established for the analysis considering asymmetric nature of structural layout and loading conditions. To summarize this result of structural assessment based on IACS CRS for bulk carrier, it is benefit to design this kind of bulk carriers and to study the strength assessment for the similar type of bulk carriers.

  • PDF

Condition assessment of raking damaged bulk carriers under vertical bending moments

  • Kim, Do Kyun;Yub, Su Young;Choi, Han Suk
    • Structural Engineering and Mechanics
    • /
    • v.46 no.5
    • /
    • pp.629-644
    • /
    • 2013
  • This paper concerns about the raking damages on the ultimate residual hull girder strength of bulk carriers by applying the modified R-D diagram (advanced method). The limited raking damage scenarios, based on the IMO's probability density function of grounding accidents, were carried out by using sampling technique. Recently, innovative method for the evaluation of the structural condition assessment, which covers the residual strength and damage index diagram (R-D diagram), was proposed by Paik et al. (2012). This concept is applied in the present study and modified R-D diagram, which can be considered vessel size effect, is then proposed. Four different types of bulk carrier structures, i.e., Handysize (37K), Supramax (57K), Kamsarmax (82K) and Capesize (181K) by Common Structural Rule (CSR), were applied to draw the general tendency. The ALPS/HULL, intelligent supersize finite element method, was employed for the ultimate longitudinal strength analysis. The obtained empirical formulas will be useful for the condition assessment of bulk carrier structures. It can also cover different sizes of the bulk carriers in terms of ultimate longitudinal strength. Important insights and findings with useful guidelines developed in this study are summarized.