• 제목/요약/키워드: KSE listed firms

검색결과 12건 처리시간 0.024초

상장중소기업의 직접금융 활성화를 위한 기관투자가 역할 (Expected Roles of the Korean Institutional Investors for listed S&M sized firms in the KSE)

  • 전양진
    • 한국산업융합학회 논문집
    • /
    • 제7권4호
    • /
    • pp.363-368
    • /
    • 2004
  • The stocks of listed S&M sized firms in the KoreaStock Exchange(KSE) have been neglected to investors for long time in site of their good performences. The word "Neglected" means that the stocks of listed S&M sized firms in the KSE have fail to acquried liquidity. In the result, Listed S&M sized firms in the KSE have not financed equity by issuing stocks timely in the primary market. This problem has resulted in poor investment to their listed S&M sized firms in the KSE. The possible key to sovlve this problem is in the Institutional Investors, especially to the Pension fund. Korean Institutional Investors have lost their basic roles, that is, final supports to prevent the markets not to demolish. The Acts prventing Pension to invest to the stocks is to change to allowing to invest them in soon. this opportunity is good chance to solve the problems of poor liquidity of stocks of listed S&M sized firms in the KSE.

  • PDF

중소·벤처기업의 M&A를 이용한 기술이전 전략 (A Strategy of Technology Transfer Based on M&A in Small & Venture Business)

  • 송명규;정혜순;임대현
    • 지식경영연구
    • /
    • 제5권1호
    • /
    • pp.39-56
    • /
    • 2004
  • Mergers and Acquisitions(M&A) have long played an important role in the growth of firm. M&A has been considered a effective strategy for Korean government to restructure industry. Previous studies provided mixed results on the synergy effect of M&A This study provides investigation on 39 mergers occurred over the sample period from 2000 to 2001. In this study, event study methodology arc used to calculate abnormal return(AR) and cumulative abnormal return(CAR) based on mean-adjusted model. The testing period of this study from date -30 through date +30, where date zero is the date of the first public announcement of the merger. The empirical results in this study can be summarized as follows. First, the return rates of KOSDAQ registered firms with M&A appears higher than that of KSE listed firms. This means that public announcement of M&A is more influential on stock price for KOSDAQ registered firms than KSE listed firms. Second, The difference between actual merging price and fair value is significant in KSE listed firms and KOSDAQ registered firms. This means that the investors take M&A of KOSDAQ registered firms as a good news. Third, the impact on the market prices of merging firms take place after the first public announcement of the merger in KSE registered firms. But the impact on the market prices take place not only merging firms but also merged firms in KOSDAQ registered firms. This result shows that the investors recognize a M&A is a strategy of technology transfer in small & venture business.

  • PDF

기업 소유구조가 연구개발비 지출에 미치는 영향: 유가증권시장과 코스닥시장 상장기업 비교를 중심으로 (The Effects of Corporate Ownership Structure on R&D Expenditures: Comparison between KSE and KOSDAQ Listed Firms)

  • 조신;정우진
    • 기술혁신학회지
    • /
    • 제20권1호
    • /
    • pp.239-270
    • /
    • 2017
  • 이 연구는 대표이사, 최대주주, 외국인의 지분율 변화가 R&D 지출 강도에 어떤 영향을 미치는지에 대해, 2007년부터 2014년까지 유가증권 및 코스닥 시장에 상장된 553개 제조업체를 대상으로 패널 분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과, (1) 대표이사 지분율과 R&D 지출간의 관계에 대해서, 코스닥 기업에서는 역-U자형 관계가 있음을 확인하였다. 이러한 비선형 관계는 이론 연구나 미국 기업에 대한 실증 연구들과 합치하며, 경영자 주식소유가 R&D 관련 대리인 비용을 줄이는데 일정 부분 기여함을 보여준다. 한편 최대주주가 아닌 대표이사가 의미 있는 수준의 주식을 보유하는 경우가 드문 유가증권시장 기업에서는 유의한 관계를 발견하지 못했다. (2) 최대주주 지분율과 R&D 지출간의 관계에 대해서는, 유가증권시장 기업에서 음(-)의 상관관계를 발견하였는데 이는 최대주주가 R&D 활동에 제대로 영향력을 행사하지 못하거나, 최대주주와 외부 주주간의 대리인 문제 때문으로 판단된다. 코스닥 기업에서는 최대주주가 R&D에 부정적 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났는데, 전문성을 가진 창업자가 경영 일선에서 활동하는 경우가 많아서 이러한 대리인 문제가 덜 일어나기 때문으로 보인다. (3) 외국인 지분율과 R&D 지출 강도 사이에는 두 시장 모두 유의미한 관계를 확인하지 못했다. 본 연구는 소유구조가 R&D 활동에 미치는 영향 면에서 유가증권시장과 코스닥 기업들 간에 뚜렷한 차이가 있음을 처음으로 보이고, 이를 이론적으로 설명하였다는 점에서 기존 연구와 차별성이 있다.

R&D Scoreboard에 의한 연구개발투자와 성과의 연관성 분석

  • 조성표;이연희;박선영;배정희
    • 기술혁신연구
    • /
    • 제10권1호
    • /
    • pp.98-123
    • /
    • 2002
  • This study develops a Korean R&D Scoreboard which has originated from the R&D Scoreboard in United Kingdom. The Scoreboard contains details of the R&D investment, sales, growth, profits and employee numbers for Korean companies which are extracted from company annual reports and key ratios calculated, with some movements over time. Companies are classified by the Korea Standard Industrial Classification. The Scoreboard contains 190 companies which consist of 100 largest companies and 30 middle-or small-sized firms listed in Korea Stock Exchange (KSE), and 30 ventures and 30 other firms listed in KOSDAQ. The overall company R&D intensity (R&D as a percentage of sales) is 2.1% compared to the international average of 4.2%. Korea has an unusually large R&D percentage of sales in IT hardware (4.9%) and telecommunication (3.7%). R&D intensity is positively correlated with company performance measures such as profitability, sales growth, productivity and market value. For largest companies listed in KSE and ventures listed in KOSDAQ, the ratio of operating profit to sales is greater for high R&D intensity companies. Sales growth is in proportion to R&D intensity for all companies. Plots of value added per employee or sales per employee vs R&D per employee rise together for the sectors studied, especially for the chemical sectors and automobile sectors, demonstrating a correlation with productivity. The average market value of high R&D companies in the KSE has risen more than 1.6 times that of the KOSPI 200 index. Given the correlation between R&D intensity and company performance and given that R&D is a smaller percentage of surplus (profits plus R&D) than international level (both overall and in several sectors), the challenges facing Korean companies are to maintain the leading position in IT hardware and telecommunication, and to increase the intensity of R&D in many medium-intensive R&D sectors where Korea has an average intensity well below international or US levels.

  • PDF

Family Firm Governance and Long-term Corporate Survival: Evidence from Korean Listed Firms

  • Ahn, Se-Yeon
    • 아태비즈니스연구
    • /
    • 제12권1호
    • /
    • pp.25-39
    • /
    • 2021
  • Purpose - This study aims to examine whether family firm governance is related to long-term corporate survival. To find out whether and why family firms have higher chances of long-term survival compared to non family firms, this study analyzes the relationship between some governance characteristics that are prevalent in family firms and corporate long-term viability. Design/methodology/approach - This study utilizes a sample of 285 family firms listed on the Korea Stock Exchange (KSE) to probe the influence of governance characteristics on corporate survival. This study conducts Cox proportional hazard regression analysis to estimate the influences on the survival duration. Findings - The results indicate that firms with particular governance characteristics show higher long-term survivability. Specifically, the probability of firm's long-term survival is increased when the CEO is the largest shareholder, which may be related to CEO's stewardship attitudes. Research implications or Originality - This study has significance in that it examines the direct causal variables that enhance long-term corporate viability through a large scale empirical examination. Also, the study findings provide some clues as to why certain family firms outlive non-family firms.

기업의 연구개발투자가 특허에 미치는 영향: 한국 제조업기업을 대상으로 (The Effects of R&D Investment on Patent: An Empirical Analysis Using Korean Manufacturing Firm Data)

  • 김태기;장선미
    • 기술혁신연구
    • /
    • 제12권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-24
    • /
    • 2004
  • This paper analyses the effects of R&D investment on patent in Korean manufacturing firms during the period 1984-99. The data contains 140 companies which listed in Korea Stock Exchange(KSE). We observed that the relative shares of R&D investments and patent applications are much higher in scientific firms than in the other firms. The regression results show that R&D investment has significantly positive effects on the growth of patent application and registration. And the effects of R&D on patent turns out to be stronger in scientific firms than the other firms. The firm size and the capital intensity also have an important effect on the propensity to patent.

  • PDF

Business Strategy and Overvaluation: Evidence from Korea

  • CHA, Sangkwon;HWANG, Sunpil;KIM, Yibae
    • The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
    • /
    • 제6권4호
    • /
    • pp.83-90
    • /
    • 2019
  • The purpose of this study is to test the effect of business strategy on valuation error. Business strategy includes managerial decision making and managerial tendency. In previous research, there is a negative relationship between business strategy and accounting quality. In this study, we try to confirm whether strategy tendencies affected valuation errors. In order to confirm empirically between business strategy and overvaluation, we use 8,117 firms that between 2006 and 2017 and listed in KSE and KOSDAQ. We calculated business strategy which is introduced by Bentley, Omer, and Sharp (2013). We also used the overvaluation method introduced in Rhodes-Kropf, Robinson, and Viswanathan (2005). The results show that the more the leading business strategy is, the greater the value error becomes. In the case of dividing into leading and defensive companies, the lead firms showed a significant positive correlation with the valuation errors, while the defensive firms showed the negative relationship with overvaluation. This study examined the business strategy and the overvaluation. we confirmed whether the management strategy deepens the evaluation error caused by the firm characteristics. The results are meaningful that we extended the study on the quality of financial reporting of leading strategic firms.

기업지배구조가 한국기업들의 국제화수준에 미치는 영향: 소유지분 집중도의 조절효과를 중심으로 (The Effects of Corporate Governance on Internationalization in Korean Firms: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Ownership Concentration)

  • 양영수;박영렬;이재은
    • 국제지역연구
    • /
    • 제17권4호
    • /
    • pp.23-42
    • /
    • 2013
  • 본 연구는 1999년부터 2006년까지 한국 상장기업(제조기업으로 한정) 454개사를 대상으로, 기업지배구조(재벌기업, 가족기업 여부)가 기업의 국제화 수준에 미치는 영향을 소유지분 집중도의 조절효과를 중심으로 분석하고 있다. 실증분석결과 재벌기업과 가족기업의 기업지배구조는 기업의 국제화수준에 유의한 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 소유지분 집중도의 조절효과를 검증한 결과 소유지분집중도가 높을수록 재벌기업의 지배구조가 국제화 수준에 미치는 정(+)의 영향이 약화된다는 증거가 발견되었다. 하지만 소유지분 집중도가 가족기업의 지배구조와 국제화 간의 관계에는 아무 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 분석결과는 재벌기업과 가족기업의 경우 그렇지 않은 기업보다 국제화에 긍정적인 영향을 미칠 수 있지만, 소유지분 집중도가 높은 경우 높은 위험회피 성향으로 인해 재벌기업이 국제화에 미치는 정의 영향이 약화될 수 있다는 것을 시사한다.

신흥국 기업의 지배구조와 기업의 장기 생존 (Corporate Governance and Long-term Corporate Survival in an Emerging Economy)

  • 김장훈;안세연
    • 무역학회지
    • /
    • 제46권3호
    • /
    • pp.65-79
    • /
    • 2021
  • This paper investigates how corporate governance characteristics are related to long-term corporate survival in an emerging economy. We used the data of 311 companies listed on the Korean Stock Exchange (KSE) in 1979 and examined the survival chances of those companies through the IMF crisis in 1998, upon governance characteristics that are expected to increase long-term strategic orientations. We utilized Cox regression model for the analysis. The results indicate that firms with particular governance characteristics that may be tied to CEO's long-term orientations show higher long-term survivability. Specifically, the probability of a firm's long-term survival is increased when founding family ownership is sustained, the company ownership is concentrated, and the CEO is the largest shareholder. This study has significance in that it is one of initial tries to examine the impact of corporate governance on long-term corporate survival with large scale statistical analysis. Also, the study findings provide some clues as to why the portion of family firms in emerging economies is continuously increased, thus providing meaningful insights to corporate governance literature.

최초공모주의 이론과 실증연구에 관한 고찰 (A Review on Theories and Empirical Studies of Initial Public Offers)

  • 김범진
    • 산학경영연구
    • /
    • 제11권
    • /
    • pp.217-239
    • /
    • 1998
  • 최초공모주의 공모가 결정에 관한 이론, 최초공모주의 공모가 결정에 관한 실무와 공모가 실태에 관한 실증적 연구의 동향을 파악할 필요가 있다. 우리나라 최초공모주에 관한 실증적 연구들을 종합적으로 조사하고 분석하여 다음과 같은 시사점을 확인하였다. 첫째, 공모가의 결정을 위해서 본질가치를 계산하는 경우에 기업의 특성(업종, 규모, 연령, 재평가 여부, 영업권의 크기 등)과 기업환경(산업, 경제여건과 정부와의 관계, 규제)이 반영되어야 하고, 상대가치를 계산하는 경우에 장외등록기업의 주가도 반영되어야 할 것이다. 둘째, 공개기업의 회계보고서를 감사하는 경우에 최초공모주의 상장연도부터 이익조정여부에 대한 관심을 높여야 할 것이다. 셋째, 주간사회사들은 발행기업에 대한 정보의 정확성을 높일 수 있도록 노력해야 할 것이고, 감사인도 감사의 질을 높일 수 있도록 노력해야 할 것이며, 관련 기관은 이에 대한 제도적 지원을 강구해야 할 것이다. 넷째, 최초공모주를 발행하는 경우에 경영자는 경영성과가 양호한 시기를 선택하는 경향이 존재한다는 점에 유의할 필요가 있을 것이다.

  • PDF