• Title/Summary/Keyword: Judicial Precedent Study

Search Result 20, Processing Time 0.028 seconds

A Study on the Unfair Aspect of Specific Provisions in the Construction Contract : Counterplan and Institutional Reformation (건설공사 계약서상 불공정특약에 대한 대처방안 및 제도개선에 관한 연구)

  • Choi Jea-Won;Park Keun-Hyung;Kim Yong-Su
    • Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • /
    • v.5 no.6 s.22
    • /
    • pp.146-153
    • /
    • 2004
  • The purposes of this study are to survey unfair aspects of specific provisions in the construction contract, and to suggest counterplans and institutional reformations. The research method of this study includes judicial precedent analysis and a questionnaire survey, The results of this study are as follows: 1) the main problems of unfair specific provisions are payment condition, shifting of the responsibility and adjustment in the contract sum. 2) counterplans ate suggested according to the construction phase : bid, construction and completion phase. 3) institutional reformations include firming up regulations, supervision, invigoration of claim, development of variation guideline, and so on.

A Study on the Legal Aspect of Concept for the Acupuncture and Moxibustion in Traditional Korean Medical Practice: based on Judicial Precedent (침구의료행위의 의미에 관한 법학적 고찰: 판례분석 중심의 접근)

  • Lee, Mee-Sun;Kim, Kun-Hyung;Kim, Jae-Kyu;Lee, Byung-Ryul;Yang, Gi-Young
    • Journal of Acupuncture Research
    • /
    • v.28 no.5
    • /
    • pp.19-27
    • /
    • 2011
  • Objectives : The purpose of this study is to describe the concept of the acupuncture and moxibustion in traditional Korean medical practice and to identify the meaning and potential rearrangement of the acupuncture and moxibustion. Methods : The study was performed by analyzing 136 cases of lawsuit in the year between 1968 and 2010 which were selected among the acupuncture and moxibustion in traditional Korean medical practice. Results : According to court rulings, the acupuncture and moxibustion in traditional Korean medical practice is an act to diagnose a person's illness, prescribe and treat to cure based on traditional Korean medicine, to be understood as a medical care in traditional Korean medicine, to have some factor to create or increase danger to preservation of health or hygiene, and to be practiced by medical specialists based on their professional knowledge. But, such definition is not proper and exceedingly vague. Besides medical circumstances in traditional Korean medicine are changing, the enlargement of definition of the acupuncture and moxibustion is required. Conclusions : The meaning and scope of the acupuncture and moxibustion in traditional Korean medical practice should be modified and amended, reflecting these conditions.

A Study of Authors' Moral Rights Infringements Regarding Cinematographic Works and Other Visual Works (음악·영상저작물의 동일성유지권 침해관련 연구)

  • Kang, Sang-Gu
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.21 no.6
    • /
    • pp.228-236
    • /
    • 2021
  • This research investigates the causes of infringements related to authors' moral rights which has most conflict among moral rights of authorship, through analysis of judicial precedents and compare whether there subsists any differences in viewpoints between judicial precedent trend and those on behind the scene of broadcast production. Copyright is divided into intellectual property and moral rights of authorship. Right to the integrity of the work is part of moral rights of authorship and produce one content and used in various media. When the edit is needed to fit the organization and advertisement time, advanced consultation from the rightful owner or written consent is needed. However, under the time pressure or ignorance of copyright, the arbitrary edits are made and content is used. This infringes the right of the integrity of the work. When we produce and use cinematographic works and other audiovisual works, there are considerable variablilies stemming from authorship, production cost and program staff. Therefore, prior conscent is needed to acquire and use the copyright in a proper manner. However, due to production-oriented environment and low understanding of the copyright protection, we usually depend on the users' work practices rhather than insufficiency of copyright laws in dealing with the infringement of right to the industry. In conclusion, we need to provide meticulous work manual and to focus on systematic eduction of professional copyright manpower.

A Study on the Rights of Transport Terminal Operators;An Analysis of the Korean Supreme Court's Judgment of 27 April 2007, Case No. 2007Da4943 (항만터미널운영자의 권리에 관한 고찰;대법원 2007.4.27.선고 2007다4943 판결 평석)

  • Kim, Jin-Kwon
    • Journal of Navigation and Port Research
    • /
    • v.32 no.1
    • /
    • pp.97-102
    • /
    • 2008
  • According to the trend of a large-sized vessel and a industrial carrier, the role of the independent contractors such as transport terminal operators, stevedores and warehousemen is increasing the base of cargo distribution that include the function of storage, warehousing, loading, unloading, trimming, dunnaging and lashing. But the common law doctrine of privity of contract has been a perennial source of difficulty for litigants seeking to enforce rights and obligations arising under a bill of lading contract. When carriage contract is negotiated, the concerned parties will be aware that some portion of obligations arising from the contract will be performed by the independent contractors engaged to carry out a particular function. It is reasonable for the independent contractors to be allowed the benefit of the carrier under the contract of carriage. As a part of the alleviating measures for the liability of independent contractors has been allowed various schemes, specially including 'Himalaya Clause'. Therefore, this study performed the validity of 'Himalaya Clause' by means of a recent judicial precedent by the Supreme Court and analyzed the rights of third parties, specially transport terminal operators, under the contract of carriage.

A Study on the Aviation Case Law - Focusing on the Air Carrier's Liability for Passenger - (항공판례의 연구 - 여객운송인의 책임을 중심으로 -)

  • Kim, Jong-Bok
    • The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
    • /
    • v.22 no.2
    • /
    • pp.53-83
    • /
    • 2007
  • The purpose of this paper is to study precedent cases of the Air carrier liability for passengers. The article 17 of Warsaw Convention (also in Montreal Convention article 17-1) provides the Air carrier liability for passengers which is the most essential part of the Air carrier liability. According to these Conventions, 1) the carrier is liable for damage sustained in case of death or bodily injury of a passenger. Precedents and theories have disagreements on whether the damage covers the mental injury as well. 2) The carrier is liable for damage sustained from aviation accident. The definition of 'aviation accident' is becoming problematic. 3) The carrier is liable for damage sustained in case of death or bodily injury of a passenger upon condition only that the accident which caused the death or injury took place on board the aircraft or in the course of any of the operations of embarking or disembarking. The question at issue is the range of the operations of embarking or disembarking. This paper introduces the precedents (also, the model precedents) about the carriers liability for passengers and related cases, so as to help understand the trend of judicial decisions. Furthermore, the cases, once took all of the attention of the international air carriers, concerned with the 'Economy class syndrome' (DVT : Deep Vein Thrombosis) are also presented. Under the new Montreal Convention, the carriers liability for passengers will continue to be the main issue. Thus it is required that academics as well as practical businesses may keep up their studies about this issue.

  • PDF

A Case Study on "Control" of the Franchisor (가맹본부의 통제의무에 관한 판례연구)

  • Min, Joo-hee
    • Korea Trade Review
    • /
    • v.42 no.5
    • /
    • pp.1-18
    • /
    • 2017
  • This study focuses on the recent case held as to control in franchising. On the basis of analysis of the recent case, it examines the validity of the decision and suggests practical advice. The extensive judicial precedent has held that the franchisor and the franchisee possess the independent contractor relationship. But Williams v. Jani-king of Philadelphia Inc. suggest the conversion of the franchisee's status to an employees instead of an independent contractor. Franchisees allege that they were wrongly classified as independent contractors instead of employees because Jani-King had the ability to control the manner in which franchisees perform their day-to-day tasks. The appeal court held that Pennsylvania law does not distinguish between controls put in place to protect a franchise's intellectual property and controls for other purposes, and a franchisee may be an employee or an independent contractor depending on the nature of the franchise system controls. However, some degree of controls by the franchisor over the franchisee is inherent in the franchise and may even be mandated by the federal and state laws. Moreover, the appeal court affirmed that the franchise agreement, policies manual, and training manual alone could be sufficient to resolve the employment status. But it seems appropriate that the right to control on the documents is considered with the actual control.

  • PDF

A Legal Study on the Electronic Ticketing (전자항공권의 법적 제문제에 대한 고찰)

  • Kim, Jong-Bok
    • The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
    • /
    • v.21 no.2
    • /
    • pp.55-69
    • /
    • 2006
  • Electronic ticketing ("e-ticketing") through the internet will be the most critical commercial tool in the international airline industry. Actually the International Air Transport Association(IATA) has announced that it's goal is to accomplish 100 percent implementation of e-ticketing worldwide by 2007. Domestically e-ticketing will be put into operation in a full scale from the next year(2007). Thus, we count on, sooner or later, e-ticketing will be accomplished globally. As a legal aspect, this e-ticketing raises many legal issues which are no longer subject to a static set of legal rules driven by judicial precedent because e-ticketing is carried out on the "cyber space" which is a new and developing law area. In this treatise, I studied these legal issues, specially on the time and place(jurisdiction) of the contract which are the most important issues based on the New Montreal Convention signed at Montreal on May 28, 1999, which would seem prove that the airline industry is receptive and capable of change. Upon this opportunity, I hope the more comprehensive legal study on the e-ticketing will be introduced in the near future.

  • PDF

A Study on the Judicial Precedent regarding a Right to a View (조망권에 관한 판례연구)

  • Koo, Jae-Koon
    • Journal of Environmental Policy
    • /
    • v.7 no.3
    • /
    • pp.63-88
    • /
    • 2008
  • In this treatise I have advanced a theory to regulate legal problems rationally arising from a right to a view and I have checked some precedents dealing with the temporary injunction, compensation for damage and the demolition of a house(mainly apartment) owing to an infringement of a right to a view. Relating to an infringement of a right to a view, there are more lawsuits which are instituted together with an infringement of a right to enjoy sunshine than lawsuits related only to the right to a view. In the cases of an infringement of a right to a view connects with educational or religious environment, the court made it a decision that the construction is prohibited from constructing more than a certain-story building to protect a right to a view. Plaintiffs won a case their suit in the original judgement regarding a claim for damages owing to an infringement of a right to a view, but the Supreme Court reversed the decision of a lower court. The right to a sky view should not be infringed in case of a dwelling house which is not built for the purpose of business or a view.

  • PDF

A Study on the Justification for Disciplinary by the reason for Whistle-blowing (근로자의 내부고발을 이유로 한 징계의 정당성)

  • Choi, Hong-Ki
    • Journal of Legislation Research
    • /
    • no.44
    • /
    • pp.611-653
    • /
    • 2013
  • An whistle-blowing is recognition of acts of misconduct or corruption by individuals(laborers) or party which belongs to a certain organization and it refers to the act of informing to the senior organization or to the outside public agency to avoid jeopardies that could be potentially lead against benefit of the public. These whistle-blowings can be a Ansatz that improve corporation's transparency and accountability by prevention of enterprise's misconduct as well, it has been recognized as an important role for the establishment of corporate ethics, moreover, social justice. What to be treated primarily as labor law problem is arousing some controversies of the possibility that the public announcement could be whether a disciplinary punishment or not because it brings some mischievous effects for the honor and the reputation to the company which conducted the illegal actions and the action of the contrary to the social value. And futhermore, recently, the matter of compensational responsibility according to the arrangement conversion, bullying followed by the informant has been brought up. The fundamental standpoint of precedent related with the judgement of justification for the punishment as reason of the whistle-blowing ought to do the sincere duty for the labor contract which is the employees are supposed to consider the employer's profits. For that reason, if the emploee release the inside fact to the public and give any damages to employer's secret or confidence or honor, it will be a causing reasong of the disciplinary punishment, but in specific cases, the relevant and level of punishment limitation can be judged by the contents of public announcement and the truth, the purpose of the acts and details and the way of announcement. Precisely, on the assumption that there are necessity of the characteristic profit or the freedom of expression for the informant, with overall consideration whether or the basis part of the informant is true or there is a fair reason which make the informant believe is true or the purpose of informant has the public profit or the contents of the whistle-blowing are important for relevant organization or the means and the way was suitable, if the whistle-blowing are approved to be resonable, the organization are not permitted the reprimand or dismiss Futhermore, to find the solution for the issues of the disciplinary punishment and the treatment of all sorts of disadvantages, for the reason of whistle-blowing, since the protection law for public declarer which was enacted in last 2011 have the position as the general law, the purport of the equal law has to be considered sytematically and also the judicial precedent which is related to the justification of whistle-blowing are needed to be considered as well.

A Legislative Study on the Plans for its Improvements and Problems of the Lien in the Real Estate Auction (부동산경매에서 유치권의 문제점과 개선방안에 대한 입법론적 검토)

  • Jun, Jang-Hean
    • Journal of Legislation Research
    • /
    • no.41
    • /
    • pp.261-302
    • /
    • 2011
  • A lien is the right to possession the thing until receiving repayment of its bonds in some cases that the property of other person or the occupant for marketable securities receive the bond that has occurred on that property or marketable securities. This has own purpose to break 'principle of creditor equality' to protect especially the bond of the subject occupant in terms of justice. These lien on our civil law come according to the law in prepared certain requirements. However, an incomplete real rights granted by way of security that does not have a preferential performance right or seniority on the exchange value of the object suffer from the problems a lot in the real estate auction process because of the feature that is not announced in the register unlike the mortgage. In addition, the lien of real estate is not lapsed in an auction process. There is no preferential performance righ in a positive law as providing that can oppose to the buyer(a successful bidder) until received repayment the secured bond price to be compliant with the lien(Civil Case Execution Law the 91st clause of Article 5). However, as asserted the super preferential performance righ to a buyer in real terms, acts as primary cause of breaking unexpected loss and according unfair law relation to a senior mortgagee and seizor, etc. and the principles of the creditors equality to the persons concerned in other words, the principles of justice. All of these issues are the establishment of the lien and theory conflict on the effects. In spite of the fluctuations of a real right about real estate is announced as a registration by the current law, only the lien come into unclear announcement means for possession. In addition, Civil Case Execution Law argument is caused by the adoption abernahmeprinzip about the lien (Civil Case Execution Law the 91st clause of Article 5). Therefore, this paper was examined briefly the significance and purpose, history and law-making examples of each country and the valid requirements and effect of the lien that is basic principle of law about the lien system above all. And then, it will be reviewed the improvement plan for de lege ferenda to improve the issues about this after reviewing the objection, theory and judicial precedent about opposing power and preferential performance right of the lien in the real estaKey Words : Lien, Oppose Power, Mortgage right, Preferential Performance right, Seizure, Real Estate Auction, Lien who can not Opposing against Successful Bidder, Lien who can Oppose against Successful Bidder, Possessionte auction that is a fundamental problem on requirement and effect of the lien.