• Title/Summary/Keyword: Jigunsan Formation

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

The Mineralogy and Chemistry of Clay Minerals of the Middle Ordovician Jigunsan Formation: Implications for the Metamorphic Grade (중부오오도비스기 직운산층 점토광물의 광물학적 및 화학적 연구: 변성정도에 대한 의의)

  • Ko, Hee-Kyeong;Lee, Yong-Il
    • Journal of the Mineralogical Society of Korea
    • /
    • v.4 no.1
    • /
    • pp.32-42
    • /
    • 1991
  • Illite 'crystallinity' and chlorite chemistry are applied to the evaluation of the thermal grade of the Jigunsan Formation. Illite 'crystallinity' value of the formation has the range fom 4.48 to 32.5 in Weaver index (W.I.) and from $0.14{{\Delta}{\circ}}\;2{\Theta}$to $0.03{{\Delta}{\circ}}\;2{\Theta}$in kubler index (K.I). Most of illite 'crystallinity' values in this formation belong to the epizone field (K.I.<$0.21{{\Delta}{\circ}}\;2{\Theta}$). The chemistry and calculated temperature of chlorites from this formation (Fe/(Fe+Mg)=0.45, Tet. Al/Octa. Al=0.84, the calculated temperature=250-270${\circ}C$) are similar to those of epizone chlorites in the literature. The results of this work show that the metamorphic grade of the Jigunsan Formation belongs to the epizone and the formation is believed to have been reached paleotemperatures of at least 300${\circ}C$.

  • PDF

The Yemi Breccia : Origin and Stratigraphic Implications (예미각력암 : 성인과 층서적 의미)

  • Woo Kyung Sik
    • The Korean Journal of Petroleum Geology
    • /
    • v.5 no.1_2 s.6
    • /
    • pp.16-26
    • /
    • 1997
  • The Yemi Breccia has been reported as a separate formation near Yemi area, Kangwondo. This formation overlies the Maggot Formation of the Joseon Supergroup unconformably, and is overlain by the Goseong Shale conformably. Based on the field observation and textural examination of the Yemi Breccia, the breccia beds are interpreted as soluton-collapse breccia beds, which were formed by the dissolution of the pre-existing evaporites. The evaporites were precipitated during the deposition of the upper part of the Maggot Formation. Therefore, the Yemi Breccia should not be regarded as a separate formation, instead, it should be considered to be a upper part of the Maggot Formation. This implies that the overlying Goseong Shale and Goseong Limestone can be correlated with the Jigunsan and Duwibong Formtions, respectively.

  • PDF

Illite, Reviewed on the Chemical Compositions - The Mixed Phase among Muscovite, Pyrophyllite and Chlorite: EPMA Quantitative Analysis of Shale from the Jigunsan Formation at Seokgaejae in Samchuk-City, Gangwon-do (화학조성으로 다시 보는 일라이트-백운모, 파이로필라이트 및 녹니석의 혼합상: 강원도 삼척시 석개재에 분포하는 직운산층 셰일에 대한 EPMA 정량분석)

  • Choi, Seung-Hyun;Mun, Hyang-Ran;Lee, Young-Boo;Lee, Jung-Hoo
    • Journal of the Mineralogical Society of Korea
    • /
    • v.25 no.3
    • /
    • pp.143-153
    • /
    • 2012
  • Mica-type minerals (illites) in the shales of the Jigunsan formation at Seokgaejae in Samchuk-City, Gangwon-do are studied using electron probe micro analysis (EPMA). The average chemical formula of the mica-type mineral obtained from the quantitative analysis is $(K_{1.17}Na_{0.04}Ca_{0.01})(Al_{2.80}Mg_{1.17}Fe_{0.78})(Si_{6.34}Al_{1.66})O_{20}(OH)_4$, which shows a chemical formula within the range of illite. These illites so called can be considered as mixed-phases among muscovite, pyrophyllite and chlorite due to the low contents of interlayer cations and high Mg, Fe. The formula of illite is separated into those three minerals and the method for the separation is newly formulated and proposed in this study. From the formula of illite, the content of muscovite is estimated from K (Na and Ca included), the content of chlorite by Mg+Fe, and the rest remains as pyrophyllite. The chemical formula of muscovite can be calculated by subtracting the compositions of pyrophyllite and chlorite from the analyzed composition of illite using an ideal formula for pyrophyllite and analyzed average formula for chlorite. The calculated formula of muscovite is supposed to be stoichiometric in principle. The result of the separation of analyzed illite is 61% muscovite, 27.3% chlorite and 11.7% pyrophyllite and the calculated formula of muscovite after separation is $(K,Na,Ca)_{2.00}Al_{3.69}(Si_{6.75}Al_{1.25})O_{20}(OH)_4$. The calculated formula of muscovite slightly low in Al content can be considered to be reasonable in general when the low content of Al in the rock and the uncertainties of chlorite compositions used in the calculation are counted. This supports that the method of separation proposed in this study is also applicable.