• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제20권
• /
• pp.25-66
• /
• 2009

This paper checked the trend of exiting researches on Jeungsan's thought and investigated the academic problems of Daesun's thought as an basic work to form the deep academic discussions on Daesun's thought. Grouping into the scriptures of Jeungsangyo, its theses and papers, I synthesized the present state of researches. In the case of papers, I divided into three periods, before 1990, 1990s' and after 2000. Grouping into three fields, the periods, the researchers and the themes, I investigated the characteristics of the researches of Jeungsan's thought through the main scriptures, theses and papers, and reports of actual state. In conclusion, I brought up the ten problems about academic questions of Daesun's thought.

• 한국철학논집
• /
• 제52호
• /
• pp.243-280
• /
• 2017

19~20세기 초 한국에는 다양한 종교운동이 분출하였다. 서구 기독교가 유입하여 크게 성장하였고, 전통 유교 역시 종교로서 변화를 모색했다. 동시에 새로운 종교들도 나타났는데 대표적인 것이 동학(천도교), 대종교, 증산교, 원불교의 민족종교이다. 대체로 이들 민족종교는 한국의 전통적 종교성과 연관된 한국 정신문화와 깊은 관련이 있다. 본 연구에서는 민족종교 속에 내재한 한국 정신문화를 추론해 보고자 한다. 이를 위해 먼저 한국 전통의 정신문화인 단군신화, 제천의식, 소도 등과 외래문화와 한국 정신의 융합을 추구한 최치원, 원효, 일연, 이황 등의 철학을 경천사상, 실천사상, 조화사상 등으로 정리하고, 이후 민족종교인 동학, 원불교, 증산교에서 이들이 어떻게 발현되는지를 추론하고자 한다.

• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제24_1권
• /
• pp.255-289
• /
• 2014

This study's aim is to identify modern and post-modern values and transnationalism embodied in Daesoon Thought and to seek for the new value to overcome irrationality of modern values in this society we live in. Several previous studies discussed about these issues, but most of them studied them on the basis of Korean new religions or Jeungsangyo, or in sociological theory perspective. Therefore, this study focused on Daesoon Thought encompassing ideological perspective as well as historical perspective of Daesoonjinrihoe. As for nationalism, while Eastern learning(Dong-Hak) is prone to ethnocentricity, Daesoon Thought shows trans-ethnic perspective. As for historical perspectivel, Mugeuikdo, a precursor to Daesoonjinrihoe showed non-relationship with any politics as contrasted with other new korean religious movement at that time. As for aspects of modern values, 3 perspectives (political system, social system, abolition of premodern values) were discussed. As for political system perspective, while Eastern learning advocates democratic modernity but accepted monarchy, Jeungsan denied monarchy. And While western political philosophy advocated rationality-based absolute person, Daesoon Thought proposes ideal human who can have political power and do religious indoctrination all together. As for social system perspective, while western humanism is based on all of he people's equity in front of God, Eastern learning on humans are Heaven (人乃天), Daesoon Thought is based on Injon thought(人尊思想) which encompasses spiritual world, human world and all of the universe. Daesoon Thought also proposes abolition of discrimination by gender, social position. As for abolition of premodern values, Daesoon Thought critics pre-modern formalism and advocate acceptance of other nations' culture, pragmatism, and humanism. As presented above, Daesoon Thought has not only modern values but also aspects of post-modernity and transnationalism. In the future, further studies are needed which tackle these issues and search for new values of Daesoon Thought which can overcome limitation of modern values.