• Title/Summary/Keyword: J. Rawls

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

The Conditions of Communication for Autonomous Political Participation -Concentrating on the theories of J. Rawls and J. Habermas.- (자율적 정치참여를 위한 의사소통의 조건 -롤즈와 하버마스를 중심으로-)

  • Hong, Sung-Ku
    • Korean journal of communication and information
    • /
    • v.19
    • /
    • pp.295-327
    • /
    • 2002
  • Deliberative democracy places its great importance on the theory that the citizens should fill the role of conducting the principles of democratic society. This is divided into two main theoretical trends in modern political theories, a liberal theory advocated by J. Rawls and a critical one emphasized by J. Habermas. Mutual understanding between two scholars focuses on the responsibility of citizens; citizens should be the reflective persons who can accept the terms of just communication going beyond the preference of individual belief. It is not denied that the discussions of deliberative democracy guided by both Rawls and Habermas do not place emphasis upon mass media. Even though they seldom regard the argument how the current media can be a essential factor in encouraging deliberative democracy, they never close the eyes to the significance of communication. Rawls stresses the political freedom of speech as the very condition which leads to the citizens' autonomous participation in politics, while Habermas places his hope on the role of mass media that would amplify the citizens' will gushed out in public sphere.

  • PDF

On the immanent Problems of Liberalism and Hegels Philosophy of Right (자유주의의 내재적 문제와 헤겔의 법철학)

  • Kwon, Young-woo
    • Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
    • /
    • v.147
    • /
    • pp.29-58
    • /
    • 2018
  • The purpose of this article is to demonstrate that Hegel's philosophy of right is a dialectic critique of liberalism. The dialectical criticism in this article does not mean the formal logical denial, but a return to self by self-negation. Thus, if Hegel's philosophy of right is a dialectical critique of liberalism, Hegel's philosophy of right will be critical of liberalism and at the same time, it will not reject liberalism, but rather have aspects of liberalism. The criticism of liberalism implies that individual freedoms and rights can not be realized subjectively through individual free acts, but are realized intersubjectively through social mediums. And this is also found in controversies among modern liberalists because modern liberalism requires the government's role and institutional arrangements for the realization of individual freedoms and rights. We can find the aspects of liberalism in Hegel's philosophy of right since Hegel's ethical life entails ultimately the concrete realization and extension of individual freedom and rights.