• 제목/요약/키워드: Intra-arterial chemotherapy

검색결과 12건 처리시간 0.016초

전이성 폐암의 외과적 치료 (Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Lung Cancer)

  • 조성래
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • 제25권9호
    • /
    • pp.948-954
    • /
    • 1992
  • In spite of recent progress in anticancer chemotherapy, the survival of patients with metastases to the lung treated nonsurgically has been extremely poor. So we adopted more aggressive surgical approaches for the treatment of patients with pulmonary metastases since 1985. We experienced 22 operations of metastatic lung cancer in 19 patients in the department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery in Kosin Medical College since 1985, so we reviewed the results of treatment retrospectively. The results were as follows: 1. The primary organs of metastatic lung cancer were 4 cases in each of the breast, uterus, and extremities, 3 cases in the rectum, 2 cases in the kidney, 1 case in each of the pelvis and liver, and the pathological findings were 13 cases in carcinoma and 6 cases in sarcoma. 2. The treatments for primary lesions were 15 cases of the operations with anticancer chemotherapy or radiation therapy, 2 cases of choriocarcinoma with anticancer chemotherapy only, 1 cases of uterine cervical carcinoma with chemo-radiation therapy, and 1 case of pelvic synovia sarcoma with intra-arterial anticancer chemotherapy. 3. Disease free intrerval were as follows: 7 cases were in 2 years to 4 years, 4 cases were in 1 year to 2 years, and 5 cases were beyond one year, of them one case was discovered primary lesion and metastatic lung tumor concomittently. 3 cases were above 4 years, of them one case of breast cancer were above 13 years especially. 4. The sites of metastatic lung cancer was 15 lesions in the right lung, and 9 lesions in the left lung, And the lobar sites were 10 lesions in the upper lobe, 2 lesions in the middle lobe, and 12 lesions in the lower lobe. 5. The operative methods of metastatic lung cancer were 7 case of partial resection of lung, 12 cases of pulmonary lobectomy, 1 case of pneumonectomy and 1 case of dissection of mediastinal lymph node. 6. The postoperative complications were 1 case of mild respiratory insufficency, 1 cases of pyothorax, and 1 case of urethral stricture. 7. Postoperative adjuvant therapy were as follows: No adjuvant therapy were 4 cases, anti-cancer chemotherapy were 8 cases, radiation therapy was 1 case, and combined with chemo k radiation therapy were 8 cases. 8. The results of long term follow-up were as follows: The 5 patients were died at 2 months, 22 months, 24 months, 32 months, and 49 months postoperatively, so mean survival period was 32 months postoperatively excluding one patient who was died at 2 months postoperatively. And 14 patients are aliving, of them 3 patients are living in recurred state, and the other 11 patients are living without any evidence of recurrence.

  • PDF

상악동암의 치료 방법에 따른 성적 비교 (Comparison of Results according to the Treatment Method in Maxillary Sinus Carcinoma)

  • 정웅기;조재식;안성자;남택근;나병식;박승진
    • Radiation Oncology Journal
    • /
    • 제13권1호
    • /
    • pp.9-18
    • /
    • 1995
  • 목적 :상악동암의 적절한 치료 방법을 알기 위하여 후향적 분석을 시행하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 1986년 1월 부터 1992년 12월 까지 전남대학교 병원에서 치료받은 상악동에서 발생한 편평상피세포암 33명을 대상으로 하였다. 남자가 24명 여자가 9명이었고 연령의 중앙간은 55세였다. 1988년에 제시된 AJCC 병기 분류법에 따른 종양의 병기는 T2 1명, T3 10명, T4 22명이었으며 경부임파절 전이는 5명에서 관찰되었다(Nl:4명, N2b;1명). 치료방법에 따라 3군으로 분류하여 분석하였으며 첫 군(FAR 군으로 명명, 16명)은 수술전 경동맥 항암화학요법(5-FU, 평균 3078mg)과 방사선치료(평균 3433cGy) 및 비타민 A(50,000 IU. daily)를 병용하고 이어서 상악전적출술 과 술 후 방사선치료(평균 2351cGy)를 시행하였다. 방사선총량은 5255cGy였다. 둘째군(SR 군으로 명명, 7명)은 상악전적출술과 술후 방사선 치료(평균 5920cGy)를 시행하였다. 셋째군(R 군으로 명명, 6명)은 근치적 목적의 방사선 치료(평균 7164cGy)만 시행하였다. 생존율 분석에는 Kaplan-Meier법을 이용하였고 두 군간의 차이에 대한 검정은 Mantel-Cox법으로 하였다. 결과 : 국소종양 제어율은 2년에 FAR, SR, R군에서 각각 $100\%$, $50\%$, $27.7\%$로 나타났다. 무병생존율은 2년에 FAR, SR, R군에서 각각 $88.9\%$, $33.3\%$, $0\%$였다. 전체적인 생존율은 2년에 FAR, SR, R군에서 각각 $88.9\%$, $40\%$, $50\%$였다. FAR군과 SR군간에, 그리고 FAR군과 R군간에 국소종양 제어율, 2년 무병생존율, 2년 생존율에 있어서의 차이는 통계학적으로 유의하였다. 그러나 SR군과 R군간의 차이는 통계학적 유의성이 없었다. 결론 :수술전 경동맥 5-FU와 비타민 A 그리고 방사선 치료를 병용 치료하여 종양의 부분적 관해를 유도한 후 상악전적출술과 추가적인 방사선 치료를 시행한 FAR군이 상악전적출술후 방사선치료를 시행한 군이나 방사선 단독치료군보다 더 좋은 성적을 보였다. 앞으로 이에 대한 전향적 연구가 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

  • PDF