• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.85-112
• /
• 2011

These days utilization of copyright in daily life and economic activities is becoming more important than ever, and IT technology is developing day by day. Along with those fact, copyright infringement and dispute is naturally increasing. This thesis dealt with the 3 different issues of ADR on copyright. The First part, introduce ADR system that was performed by Korea Copyright Committee according to Copyright law. This paper evaluate the committee's efforts to provide resolution of copyright disputes via conciliation was effective. So it needs to be look over several countries' ADR, beside conventional judicial remedy. And Korea's copyright conciliation system which is successfully operating also introduced. Second, In many countries, including South Korea are take advantage of conciliation as the way to settle down the dispute over copyright. Furthermore, looked over if we can use arbitration as tool to settle dispute or not. Currently in Korea, patent dispute is handled by Industrial Property Dispute Conciliation Committee(The Invention Promotion Act Ch.5) and Layout-design Review and Mediation Committee(The Act on the Layout-designs of Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Art.29-34), but using performance of those two committee is still too low. In comparison, the copyright committee, a affiliation organization of the ministry of culture, sports and tourism has much more result in conciliation compare with patent dispute. Copyright disputes has arbitrability of it's subject-matter and many regulating organs are interested in it. (especially, binding of arbitral award and final resolution). Take advantage of both conciliation and arbitration could be good way to resolve copyright disputes. Third, the writer look at the proposal on the creation of Northeast Regional Center for Intellectual Property ADR. Because of the nature of copyright and rapid development of internet technology, international use of work become more frequent and accordingly infringement cases are increasing. The role of commercial arbitration regimes and institutions which has progressed significantly worldwide level, but which has only just begun in the intellectual property ADR area, leads also to a clash of often very different legal cultures and protection in a market economy. International cooperation in regional area with conflict interests becomes an important alternative. But it will depend on the building of regional institutions and mechanisms. The feasibility of this proposal and preconditions were examined. Establishment of new international organization requires a lot of time, cost and efforts. And risk of failure is much too high. Therefore factual, statistical review should be preceded. In addition, technical measures, such as on-line arbitration is necessary to review also. Furthermore in order to establish new organization, the relative law, legal environment, public sentiment and international compliance must be carefully considered with factual review about the needs and economic benefits of each country Yet on complex regulatory matters such as IP and ADR, a great deal of the potential benefits from international standards arises not from the international legal framework nor even the formal content of national legislation, but from the informed and effective use made of the possibilities within the system, including by policymakers and regulators.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.199-241
• /
• 2004

This paper discusses to what extent the party autonomy can be allowed in intellectual property dispute resolution agreements in determination of governing law, international jurisdiction, and ADR agreement for arbitration, etc. in considering of the territoriality principle of IP. The party autonomy in choice of governing law and jurisdiction can be fully enjoyed in IP contract disputes. However, the freedom of choice is limited to the disputes regarding IF infringement disputes. The party autonomy is denied in the issues of determination of validity of patent or other IP rights. The author seeks the possibility to allow as much freedom in making choice of applicable law or jurisdiction, or entering into arbitration agreement.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제26권3호
• /
• pp.151-175
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 국제조약과 국내외 법령에 나타난 저작권의 제한과 예외에 관한 내용을 살피고, 디지털 장서의 공정이용에 관한 유럽사법재판소 판례를 분석하여, 디지털 장서의 공정이용을 위한 법제도적 전망을 논한다. 선행연구 분석과 이론 연구를 바탕으로 공정이용의 법리를 파악하고, 디지털 장서의 정의 및 유형을 알아본다. 공정이용을 둘러싼 실정법 체계의 이해를 위해 "베른협약", "세계지식재산권기구 저작권조약" 등 국제조약, 영국, 미국, 독일, 유럽연합 등의 국가별 법령, 그리고 국내법 상에 나타난 저작권의 제한 및 예외 규정을 살피고, 도서관 장서의 디지털 형태 전환과 부가서비스의 허용 여부 및 범주가 쟁점이 되었던 독일 다름슈타트 공과대학과 유겐 울머 출판사 간의 분쟁에 대한 유럽사법재판소의 판례를 분석하여, 이를 중심으로 우리나라 현행 저작권 체계의 개선을 위한 시사점을 제안한다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제11권6호
• /
• pp.144-154
• /
• 2011

영상저작물이 우리에게 익숙해진 만큼 영상저작물의 침해도 증가하고 있다. 영상저작물은 인터넷을 통해 늘 가까이에서 접할 수 있기 때문에 이러한 현상은 영상물의 장르나 국경을 손쉽게 넘나들며 발생한다. 우리나라의 뮤직비디오 "유혹의 소나타"가 일본 애니메이션 "파이널 판타지7"의 저작권을 침해한 사건이 대표적인 경우이다. 두 작품을 비교.분석해 보면 상당 부분에서 유사점이 발견되고, 심지어 뮤직비디오 "유혹의 소나타"에서 가수가 노래하는 부분을 제외하고는 새로운 장면이 없다고 표현할 수 있을 정도이다. 이런 상황은 개인에게도 불명예일 뿐만 아니라 국가적으로도 큰 손실일 수밖에 없으므로, 무의식적으로라도 타인의 저작권을 침해하지 않도록 철저한 대비를 하여야 한다.