• The Journal of Churna Manual Medicine for Spine and Nerves
• /
• v.6 no.2
• /
• pp.53-60
• /
• 2011

Objectives : The purpose of this study is to find out the relation between the height of intercrestal line, and HIVD(Herniated Intervertebral Disc)of Lumbar spine. Methods : We investigated 445 cases (208 male, 237 female) of patients who were diagnosed as HIVD of L-spine at either L4/5 or L5/S1 level. We analysed the relation between the height of intercrestal line and the level of HIVD. Results : 1. Among 445 cases, the level of intercrestal line with HIVD of L-spine at the specific location was different between male and female. In male, the intercrestal line is more likely to be located at L4 level, while in female more likely to be located at L5 level. 2. Among 445 cases, L5/S1 HIVD patients(272, 61.1%) were more than L4/5 HIVD patients(173, 38.9%). At L4 body area, L4/5 HIVD patients were more than L5/S1 HIVD patients, however, at L4/5 intervertebral area and L5 body area, L5/S1 HIVD patients were more than L4/5 HIVD patients. (p<0.01) 3. When the line is located at higher level, HIVD of L-spine tends to be occurred at L4/5 level. Contrastly, when the line is located at lower level, HIVD of L-spine tends to be occurred at L5/S1 level. (p<0.01) Conclusions : High intercrestal line leads to L4/5 HIVD, while low intercrestal line leads to L5/S1 HIVD. Possibly, it is caused by different length and thickness of the iliolumbar ligament.

• The Journal of Churna Manual Medicine for Spine and Nerves
• /
• v.3 no.2
• /
• pp.37-42
• /
• 2008

Objectives : One of the most important cause of spondylolisthesis is it's epidemiological structure and L5's stability takes a significant role. The purpose of this study is to assess the difference of the Tuffier's line among of Spondylolythesis patients. Methods : We analyzed the Anterior view of lumbar spine checked at erect position on 60 patients who had been diagnosed as spondylolythesis. We investigated the Tuffier's Line on X-ray film. Results and Conclusions : Age distribution was 15 to 66 and the average was 47.81. Men were 19 cases(31.6%) and women were 41 cases(68.4%). Compared to men, women were more exposed to spondylolisthesis and for the age distribution, 50's showed the biggest portion. Group of normal people showed proportion of 14.3% at L4, 44% at L4/5 and 41.7% at L5 each. And group of patients showed proportion of 48.4% at L4, 35% at L4/5 and 51.6% at L5 each. Comparing these results, significance probability was 0.004(<0.05) which was significant. As the results of comparing the relation between L4/5 and L5/S1 patients, Normal group showed average of 3.33 which were close to L4/5. When there are spondylolisthesis at L4/5, averege was 3.33, placed at lower part of the vertebra body. When there are spondylolisthesis at L5/S1, averege was 3.566, placed between lower part of the veterbra body of L4 and L4/5. The p value of Normal group and L4/5 spondylolisthesis patient group was 0.022(p<0.05) which was significant. But the p value of Normal group and L5/S1 spondylolisthesis patient group was 0.0239 which was not significant. Also p value of L4/5 spcndylolisthesis patient group and L5/S1 spondylolisthesis patient group was 0.721 which was also not significant.