• 한국방사선학회논문지
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.351-356
• /
• 2022

전립선암의 방사선치료 시 사용되는 세기조절방사선치료와 부피적회전방사선치료시 발생하는 광중성자선량을 측정하여, 암 발생률을 평가하며 기초자료를 제공하고자 하였다. Rando phantom에 중성자 측정용 광자극발광선량계를 복부와 갑상선에 위치시킨 상태에서 발생하는 광중성자선량을 측정하였다. 연구결과 세기조절방사선치료(7 portal)가 부피적회전방사선치료보다 복부와 갑상선 위치에서 모두 높게 측정되었다. ICRP 103의 명목위험계수를 이용하여 암 발생확률을 평가하였을 때, 세기조절방사선치료시 대장과 갑상선의 피폭으로 인한 암발생확률은 1,000명 당 9.9명 이었으며, 부피적회전방사선치료시는 1,000명 당 3.5명이었다. ALARA(As low as reasonably archievable)원칙에 의거하여 방사선치료계획 수립에 있어서 정상장기들의 피폭선량의 최소화를 위한 가이드라인이 되리라 사료된다.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.32-36
• /
• 2002

세기조절방사선치료(Intensity Modulated Radiation TheraIntensity modulated radiation therapy ; Virtual micro-IMRT ; Intensity map ; MLCpy)에서 세기분포도(intensity map; IM)의 공간적 분해능은 방사선 민감장기(Critical Organ)를 보호하면서 종양에 최대 선량을 주는데 매우 중요하며, 일반적으로 다엽콜리메이터(MLC)의 폭에 좌우된다. 세기분포도의 공간적 분해능을 향상시키기 위한 방법으로는 두. 가지 방법이 있는데, 하드웨어를 추가하는 방법과 방사선 조사 기술을 변경하는 것이다. 물론 다엽콜리메이터의 폭을 작게 만드는 것이 최상의 방법이나, 하드웨어 기술적으로 어렵고 또한 추가비용이 많이 들게 된다. 따라서 여기에서는 추가적 비용이 들지 않으면서 기존의 장비를 그대로 활용할 수 있는 기술적 방법 중의 하나인 가상 미세 세기조절방사선치료(Virtual micro-IMRT) 기법을 구현하여 임상적으로 적용을 하기 위한 예비적 연구를 수행하였다. 가상의 42$\times$54 픽셀크기, 0.5cm의 15 level IM을 이용하여 1$\times$1cm, 0.5$\times$lcm, 0.5$\times$0.5cm(VMIM) beamlet 크기에 대해 비교하였다. 분석결과, 기대와는 달리, 1cm 폭의 MLC로 전달가능한 0.5$\times$lcm beamlet에 비해 크게 개선되지 않았다. 이는 VMIM의 제약조건에 기인되는 것으로 판단된다. 향후, 두경부암에서와 같이 1cm이하의 beamlet 분해능이 요구되는 경우에 적용시켜 추가적인 연구가 필요하다 하겠다.

• Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.469-472
• /
• 2012

Intensity modulated photocurrent spectroscopy and intensity modulated photovoltage spectroscopy were investigated to measure the dynamic response of charge transfer and recombination in the standard, $TiCl_4$-treated and the combined scattering layer electrode dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). IMPS and IMVS provided transit time ($\tau_n$), lifetime ($\tau_r$), diffusion coefficient ($D_n$) and effective diffusion length ($L_n$). These expressions are derived that generation, collection, and recombination of electrons in a thin layer nanocrystalline DSSC under conditions of steady illumination and with a superimposed small amplitude modulation. In this experimental, IMPS/IMVS showed that the main effect of $TiCl_4$ treatment is to suppress the recombination of photogenerated electrons, thereby extending their lifetime. And the Diffusion coefficient of combined scattering layer electrode is $6.10{\times}10^{-6}$ higher than that of the others, resulting in longer diffusion length.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.213-219
• /
• 2013

본 논문은 현재 세기변조 방사선 치료를 시행 시에 일반적으로 사용 되고 있는 환자 치료 전 품질보증의 방법 중, 2차원 선량분포를 측정하여 품질을 보증하는 방법들에 관한 이슈들을 최근 3~4년 간 발표된 논문들을 중심으로 살펴보고, 향후 품질보증 방법의 개선방향에 대하여 조명해 보고자 하였다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.313-321
• /
• 2016

Purpose: Total scalp irradiation (TSI) is a rare but challenging indication. We previously reported that non-coplanar intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was superior to coplanar IMRT in organ-at-risk (OAR) protection and target dose distribution. This consecutive treatment planning study compared IMRT with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Materials and Methods: A retrospective treatment plan databank search was performed and 5 patient cases were randomly selected. Cranial imaging was restored from the initial planning computed tomography (CT) and target volumes and OAR were redelineated. For each patients, three treatment plans were calculated (coplanar/non-coplanar IMRT, VMAT; prescribed dose 50 Gy, single dose 2 Gy). Conformity, homogeneity and dose volume histograms were used for plan. Results: VMAT featured the lowest monitor units and the sharpest dose gradient (1.6 Gy/mm). Planning target volume (PTV) coverage and homogeneity was better in VMAT (coverage, 0.95; homogeneity index [HI], 0.118) compared to IMRT (coverage, 0.94; HI, 0.119) but coplanar IMRT produced the most conformal plans (conformity index [CI], 0.43). Minimum PTV dose range was 66.8%-88.4% in coplanar, 77.5%-88.2% in non-coplanar IMRT and 82.8%-90.3% in VMAT. Mean dose to the brain, brain stem, optic system (maximum dose) and lenses were 18.6, 13.2, 9.1, and 5.2 Gy for VMAT, 21.9, 13.4, 14.5, and 6.3 Gy for non-coplanar and 22.8, 16.5, 11.5, and 5.9 Gy for coplanar IMRT. Maximum optic chiasm dose was 7.7, 8.4, and 11.1 Gy (non-coplanar IMRT, VMAT, and coplanar IMRT). Conclusion: Target coverage, homogeneity and OAR protection, was slightly superior in VMAT plans which also produced the sharpest dose gradient towards healthy tissue.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.104-110
• /
• 2013

Purpose: Intensity modulated arc therapy (IMAT) is a form of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) that delivers dose in single or multiple arcs. We compared IMRT plans versus single-arc field (1ARC) and multi-arc fields (3ARC) IMAT plans in high-risk prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Sixteen patients were studied. Prostate ($PTV_P$), right pelvic ($PTV_{RtLN}$) and left pelvic lymph nodes ($PTV_{LtLN}$), and organs at risk were contoured. $PTV_P$, $PTV_{RtLN}$, and $PTV_{LtLN}$ received 50.40 Gy followed by a boost to $PTV_B$ of 28.80 Gy. Three plans were per patient generated: IMRT, 1ARC, and 3ARC. We recorded the dose to the PTV, the mean dose ($D_{MEAN}$) to the organs at risk, and volume covered by the 50% isodose. Efficiency was evaluated by monitor units (MU) and beam on time (BOT). Conformity index (CI), Paddick gradient index, and homogeneity index (HI) were also calculated. Results: Average Radiation Therapy Oncology Group CI was 1.17, 1.20, and 1.15 for IMRT, 1ARC, and 3ARC, respectively. The plans' HI were within 1% of each other. The $D_{MEAN}$ of bladder was within 2% of each other. The rectum $D_{MEAN}$ in IMRT plans was 10% lower dose than the arc plans (p < 0.0001). The GI of the 3ARC was superior to IMRT by 27.4% (p = 0.006). The average MU was highest in the IMRT plans (1686) versus 1ARC (575) versus 3ARC (1079). The average BOT was 6 minutes for IMRT compared to 1.3 and 2.9 for 1ARC and 3ARC IMAT (p < 0.05). Conclusion: For high-risk prostate cancer, IMAT may offer a favorable dose gradient profile, conformity, MU and BOT compared to IMRT.

• 한국의학물리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국의학물리학회 2002년도 Proceedings
• /
• pp.6-8
• /
• 2002

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is an advanced but expensive form of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy technique. While the initial clinical data appear to be promising for some treatment sites, the cost effectiveness of the treatment modality has yet to be justified by long-term clinical outcome. This presentation reviews the potential efficacy and limitation of IMRT in respect of the practicality, dosimetry, and resource aspects. It tries to explore and draw conclusions on the strategies for using this sophisticated and expensive treatment technique from AFOMP perspective.

• 대한방사선치료학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한방사선치료학회 2002년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.20-20
• /
• 2002

• 공업화학
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.461-466
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 염료감응형 태양전지의 효율을 향상시키기 위하여 여러 조건에서 $TiO_2$에 불소를 도핑한 후 이를 이용하여 광전극을 제조하고 그 전기화학적 특성을 평가하였다. 불소 도핑된 $TiO_2$를 이용하여 제조된 염료감응형 태양전지의 에너지 전환 효율을 전류-전압 곡선을 통하여 계산하였다. $TiO_2$ 광전극을 불소 도핑함으로써 에너지 전환 효율이 최대 3배 이상 향상되었다. 이와 같은 결과는 불소 도핑 후 에너지 준위가 감소된 $TiOF_2$가 $TiO_2$와 혼재됨으로써 광전극 내에 용이한 전자 전달이 가능하고 이로 인하여 염료 감응형 태양전지의 효율이 향상된 것으로 여겨진다. 이는 IMPS (intensity-modulated photocurrent spectroscopy) 및 IMVS (intensity-modulated photovoltage spectroscopy) 분석에서도 불소가 도핑됨으로써 전자 전달이 빨라지고, 전자 재결합은 느려지는 결과를 확인할 수 있었다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제37권4호
• /
• pp.249-253
• /
• 2019

Purpose: We aimed to analyze the trend in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) use in Korea from 2011 to 2018. Materials and Methods: We collected data from the Health and Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) big data based on the National Health Insurance Service claims and reimbursements records using primary treatment planning codes (HD 041) for IMRT from 2011 to 2018. We analyzed the changing patterns in clinical application to specific tumor sites and regional differences in IMRT utilization. Results: The use of IMRT has exhibited an 18-fold steep rise from 1,921 patients in 2011 to 34,759 in 2018. With regard to IMRT in 2018, 70% of patients (24,248/34,759) were treated in metropolitan areas (Seoul, Incheon, and Gyeonggi Province). IMRT was most commonly used to treat breast, lung, and prostate cancers in 2018. Among these, the use of IMRT for breast cancer shows the most remarkable increase from 2016 when the National Health Insurance began to cover IMRT for all solid tumors. Conclusion: The use of IMRT is steadily increasing to treat cancer and is concentrated in metropolitan areas.