• 한국한의학연구원논문집
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.53-66
• /
• 2005

This study is concerned with the patentability and protection of intellectual property rights in Traditional Korea Medicine Paper. The results analyzed significance of patentability by investigated for many kinds of Traditional Korea Medicine Paper. It provide extension of intellectual property rights protection and further research region of TKM field by analysing information of patentability. Recently, In the protection of intellectual property rights, the importance of traditional knowledge resource in many country is increased. It will predict the number of apply for the patent increased annually This study will be provide judging guideline and strategy of intellectual property rights protection by search to detect all existing similar patents in Patent Office (Korea, Japan, U.S.A. EPO) about Traditional Korea Medicine Paper. As a result, It can not be investigated about 33% because of paper research or theoretical study or question investigation etc. But the case of 'The Korea Association of Herbology' and 'The Korean Oriental Medical Ophthalmology & Otolaryngology & Dematology Society' have about 10% rate. If it will be constructed DB system, they will be protected by national treatment.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.90-103
• /
• 1999

This article is dedicated to present a cornerstone for a desirable legal structure in the area of the administration and utilization of the intellectual property rights of the university research results sponsored by the government, and, in the long run, contribute to the industrial development of our country. In order to achieve that purpose, this article reviews basic theories and current status of the intellectual property regime for the research results sponsored by the government, and presents some suggestions for a desirable legal institution, in particular, including that 'Intellectual Property Rights Administration Center', should be established, an exclusive institution for the systematic administration of the follow-ups of the research results with speciality.

• 한국IT서비스학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국IT서비스학회 2007년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.145-156
• /
• 2007

In the previous e-government studies, there was no study in which the ambitious problem of assessing the expected performance of an e-government software when it is adopted in other country. This study was motivated to propose a new method to resolve this research question. With using the KIPONet (Korean Intellectual Property Office Net) as a target e-government software, which has been successfully implemented and operated by the Republic of Korea government since Jan 1999 for the purpose of managing the intellectual property rights (IPRs), we propose a Hybrid Qualitative Reasoning (HQR) approach to predicting the expected performance of the KIPONet. The main recipes of the HQR are that the HQR considers causal relationships existing among both qualitative and quantitative variables of the KIPONet, and that uncertainties embedded in some variables are handled by using Monte Carlo mechanism. The application of the proposed HQR to predicting the expected performance of the KIPONet results in statistically significant outcomes with 95% confidence level.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.489-510
• /
• 2011

한국과 EU는 2007년 5월에 FTA 협상을 시작하여 2011년 7월 1일 자로 한 EU FTA가 잠정 발효되었다. EU는 2007년 1월에 루마니아, 불가리아의 추가 가입으로 27개 국으로 확대 개편되어 세계최대의 선진화된 단일 경제권으로 등장하였으며, 한국에게는 중국에 이어 제 2위의 교역파트너가 되었다. 일반적으로 FTA가 포함하고 있는 분야는 체약상대국들이 어떤 나라인가에 따라 상당히 다른 양상을 보인다. 오랜 역사적 전통에 따른 문화적, 학문적 자산과 상대적으로 오랜 기간 동안 축적해온 경제적, 산업적 기반을 가진 EU는 여러 가지 부문 중에서 지적재산은 단순한 보유자산의 의미를 넘어 보다 능동적으로 사용할 수 있는 자산이라는 인식이 확산되면서 이를 통해 구체적 이익을 창출하고자 노력하고 있다. 한 EU FTA에 포함된 지적재산권은 저작권 및 저작인접권, 상표, 지리적 표시, 디자인, 특허 등이다. 전체적으로 지리적 표시를 제외하면 한국에 유리한 면이 있지만, EU의 지적재산권 보호에 대한 관심이 높기 때문에 향후에도 많은 요구가 있을 것으로 판단된다. 따라서 협정에 나타난 지적재산권의 보호와 특정에 대해 살펴보는 것은 꼭 필요한 일이 될 것이다.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.145-173
• /
• 2007

Using patent and firm-level panel data for 1982-2001, this study investigates spillover effects of patents and the strengthening of intellectual property rights on Productivity and Innovation. As well as we consider the effect of intra-industry spillovers, we extend the effect to inter-industry spillovers which implies the effects of IT industries on non-IT industries. The empirical results are summarized as follows. First, allowing for firm-level variables, market competition and technological spillovers, the strengthening of intellectual property rights does not play a significant role on innovative activities. Second, while innovative activities of domestic firms affect significantly firms' innovative activities, those of foreign firms do not. Third, innovative activities of IT industries as inter-industry spillovers play a significant role on innovative activities and labor productivities of domestic firms.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.93-112
• /
• 2004

A license under UCITA(Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act) which represents the first comprehensive uniform computer information licensing law is not fundamentally rooted in intellectual property law such as patent or copyright law. A license under UCITA is simply a commercial contract, dependent wholly on the parties' ability to enter into a normal, commercial contract, just as a contract of sale or lease is simply and wholly a commercial contract. However, intellectual property rights may be licensed in a contract subject to UCITA. UCITA may not be used to vary or extend informational rights that are intellectual property rights, and expressly recognizes preemption by copyright, patent, or other federal intellectual property law in Section 105(b). Like the law of sales and leases, in general, the right to contract is constrained by principles of unconscionability, good faith and fair dealing, UCITA has an additional restraint, an express power for a court to deny enforcement of a provision in a licensing contract that violates fundamental public policy. This public policy defense is unique in UCITA. An essential purpose of this defense is to give courts some latitude in reconciling commercial licensing law with the principles of intellectual property law. Most intellectual property law is federal, and UCITA expressly recognizes the preemptive effect of that federal law. But the public policy defense gives courts an additional power to consider intellectual property principles purely within the context commercial law.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.23-45
• /
• 2008

본 연구의 목적은 해외 지식재산권 분쟁현황을 분석하고 그 대응방안을 제시하는데 있다. 특허 분쟁(국내/국외)은 2006년 7월말 현재 청구건수 기준으로 2,044건이 보고되고 있다. 이 중 외국 기업과의 특허분쟁(2000-2006)은 전기전자 분야 47건, 화학약품분야 9건, 기계분야 2건 등 58건으로 나타나고 있다. 본 연구는 주요 국제 특허분쟁 사례, 즉 우리나라의 기업체가 외국기업체를 상대로 특허침해 소송을 제기하였거나 소송을 제기 당한 사례를 전기.전자 분야 47건 중 27건, 화학약품분야 9건 중 5건, 기계분야 2건 등 34건을 기술 분야별로 정리하였다. 이들 사례의 공통점은 대개 거액을 지불하고 분쟁을 타결한 경우로서 지식재산권 관리의 중요성과 분쟁 시 정부나 기업이 적절한 대응을 하여야 함을 시사하고 있다. 우리나라가 해외 지식재산권 분쟁에 대응할 수 있는 방안은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 정부의 대응방향이다. 특허권 침해물품의 국경조치 강화, 해외지식재산권보호센터 기능의 강화 등을 수행하여야 한다. 둘째, 기업의 대응방향이다. 지식재산중시 경영(no patent no future), 강한 특허권 창출 및 전략적 분쟁 대응, 특허 풀(patent pool) 형성 및 표준화에 적극 참여, 기술이전 및 라이센스 계약 관리의 전문화 등을 기하여야 한다.

• 한국벤처창업학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국벤처창업학회 2007년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.15-43
• /
• 2007

본 연구의 목적은 해외지식재산권 침해 현황을 분석하고 그 대응방안을 제시하는데 있다. $1990{\sim}2005$년 동안 출원된 특허를 대상으로 2005년까지 발생한 권리분쟁은 모두 3,508회 발생하였으며, 이 중 무효심판(전부 무효 포함)이 1,903회로 가장 많은 것으로 나타났다. 소극적 권리범위 확인 심판은 1,001회 발생하여 발생된 분쟁의 28.5%를 차지하고 있으며, 특허권자가 권리를 침해받은 경우에 제기하는 적극적 권리범위 확인심판은 366회 발생하였다. 일본은 권리분쟁이 모두 275회 발생하여 다른 국가의 특허권자에 비해 분쟁횟수가 가장 높고, 그 중 무효심판이 107회로 38.9% 정정심판이 두 번째로 많은 83회 발생하여 30.2%를 차지하고 있다. 미국은 일본에 이어 두 번째로 분쟁횟수가 많으며, 무효심판이 66회로 무려 64.7%에 달하며, 정정심판은 21회 발생하여, 20.6%를 차지하고 있다. 해외지식재산권 침해 대응방안은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 정부의 대응방향이다. 해외지식재산권보호센터 기능의 강화, 특허권 침해물품의 국경조치 강화, 국제특허분쟁연구회 활동 강화, 국제특허분쟁 전문가의 양성, 특허소송 관할법원의 집중과 심판제도의 마련, 사회적 자본으로서 신뢰 구축 등을 수행하여야 한다. 둘째, 기업의 대응방향이다. 지식재산중시 경영(No Patent No Future), 출원 및 분쟁대응의 전문화, 특허풀(Patent Pool) 형성 및 표준화에 적극 참여, 기술이전 및 라이센스 계약 관리의 전문화 등을 기하여야 한다.

• 복식문화연구
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.287-298
• /
• 2024

Clothing is intimately intertwined with daily lives as every individual relies on it. The pervasive issue of plagiarism in the fashion industry has led to an increased demand to protect intellectual property rights. Currently, studies on the protection of fashion design intellectual property rights in China remain in the exploratory stage and warrant further investigation. This paper addresses the issue in two parts. The first part contains an analysis of the theoretical foundation for the protection of fashion design copyrights. It is further divided into three subsections. The first subsection primarily examines the concept of copyrights and laws. The second subsection focuses on the concept of fashion design copyrights and laws. The third subsection analyzes copyright laws concerning fashion designs in China. The second section offers an analysis of infringement cases involving fashion designs published during the Baiyi Cup Intellectual Property Case Summary Writing Competition held in China in 2023. It outlines the shortcomings of the current Chinese copyright laws regarding the protection of fashion designs, and proposes measures for improvement. This study argues that the institutional framework for intellectual property rights in the Chinese fashion industry should align with practical considerations and explores suitable legal regulations and how they relate to specific circumstances in China. Besides refining the legal framework, fashion designers and enterprises must take measures to entablish the intellectual property rights of their clothing brands.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.424-435
• /
• 2022

When the owners of the intellectual property rights of digital content have lost control over it in the digital environment, there emerged fears that the intellectual property laws, especially copyright law, would not be effective as in the material (Offline ) world. The reason is that the digital environment helps to reproduce copies in high quality and at almost no cost, while copyright law protection has been limited to programs embedded in CDs. According to copyright laws, the owner of the program did not have the right to prevent buyers of the initial physical copy of the program from copying and reselling it to more than one individual without the permission of the original owner. As a result, business owners have invented the idea of licensing digital content and programs instead of selling them. They set out terms that serve their commercial interests regardless of their abuse to intellectual property laws or even the rules of the traditional contract to sell a material property. The abuse has resulted from the way those terms are concluded and the heavy rules that are unfair to consumer rights. Therefore, business owners insisted on dealing with the website and its programs and digital content as material property. Here raises the question of whether the website and its digital content are subject to the protection of copyright law or the rules of the traditional contract or licensing contracts. As the answer to this question affects the protection of consumer rights, is it possible to find a balance between it and the protection of the owners of digital programs' rights.That is what we will discuss in this paper.