• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.32-39
• /
• 2019

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine which factors contribute to the surgical treatment outcomes of acetabular fractures. Simultaneously, we aim to report on the treatment results after our hospital was designated as the focused training center for trauma. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who experienced acetabular fractures from January 1, 2014 to May 1, 2017 and visited our hospital. Patients who had associated pelvic ring fractures or were lost to the one-year follow-up were excluded; a total of 37 fractures were evaluated. We evaluated the clinical results using the scoring system of Merle $d^{\prime}Aubign\acute{e}$ (MDA) and grade of Brooker for heterotopic ossification. Results: Thirty-seven patients (31 men and 6 women) were identified. The mean injury severity score (ISS) was 8.7, with 32.4% of patients having a score >15. The average blood transfusion in the first 24 hours was 0.54 pints. Falling was the most common injury mechanism (32.4%). Chest injury was the most common associated injury (16.2%), followed by head injury (13.5%). The posterior wall and both column fracture were the most common (37.8%) fracture patterns. Excellent and good clinical grades of MDA included 28 patients (75.6%) and fair and poor grades included nine (24.3%), respectively. Four patients were diagnosed with a post-operative infection (10.8%); one out of four patients who had co-morbidity died (2.7%), and another patient underwent a replacement surgery (2.7%). Multivariate analysis showed that age and operation time were associated with MDA. In addition, operation time and ISS were significant co-factors of the Brooker grade. Conclusions: Korea University Guro Hospital showed similar treatment results of acetabular fractures compared to other publications. The age and operation time were co-factors of the clinical outcome of this fracture. Additionally, increased operation time and injury severity score were suggested to increase the Brooker grade.

• 한국방사선학회논문지
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.107-114
• /
• 2012

사고로 인해 응급실을 내원한 중증외상환자로 등록된 환자 중 혈관조영술을 시행 받고, 동맥 출혈이 진단되어 동맥색전술을 시행 받은 환자를 대상으로 생존군과 사망군을 비교하여 생존의 영향을 미치는 인자와 치료방법으로 혈관조영술 및 색전술의 유용성과 적절한 시행 시점을 연구하였다. 2006년 7월부터 2010년 12월에 경기도에 위치한 H병원 응급실에 중증외상환자로 분류된 환자 중 혈관조영술과 동맥색전술을 시행한 환자 45명을 대상으로 하여 후향적 분석을 실시하였다. 주요 지표로 ISS(Injury Severity Score)와 RTS(Revised Trauma Score), 적혈구 용적률 (Hematocrit)를 삼았다. 다발성 손상의 의한 중증외상환자의 경피적 동맥색전술은 모두 성공적으로 시술되었고, 환자의 사망률과 합병증을 줄이는데 도움을 줄 수 있으며, RTS, ISS, Hematocrit, 쇼크 등이 사망률 조기 인자로써 예측이 가능하였으며 생체활력증후가 안 좋은 환자는 색전술 시행 시점을 가능한 빠르게 진행시켜야 한다.

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.98-103
• /
• 2015

Purpose: To compare injury sustained and severity of child occupant according to the types of safety restraint systems in motor vehicle crashes. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. The study subjects were child occupants under the age of 8 years who visited a local emergency center following a motor vehicle crash from 2010 to 2014. According to safety restraint: child restraint systems (CRS), belted, and unbelted, we compared injuries sustained and injury severity using the maximal Abbreviated Injury Scale (MAIS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS), and analyzed the characteristics of severe injuries (AIS2+). Results: Among 241 subjects, 9.1% were restrained in CRS, 14.5% were only belted, and 76.3% was unbelted at the time of the crashes. Fourteen had severe injuries (AIS2+), all of whom didn't be restrained by CRS. Injuries in face and neck were the highest in unbelted group, and MAIS and ISS were the lowest in CRS group. Conclusion: Among safety restraint systems for child occupant in motor vehicle crashes, the CRS have the preventive effect of face and neck injuries, and are the most effective safety restraint systems.

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.135-142
• /
• 2018

Purpose: When hemodynamically unstable patients with blunt major trauma arrive at the emergency department (ED), the safety of performing early whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) is concerning. Some clinicians perform central venous catheterization (CVC) before WBCT (pre-computed tomography [CT] group) for hemodynamic stabilization. However, as no study has reported the factors affecting this decision, we compared clinical characteristics and outcomes of the pre- and post-CT groups and determined factors affecting this decision. Methods: This retrospective study included 70 hemodynamically unstable patients with chest or/and abdominal blunt injury who underwent WBCT and CVC between March 2013 and November 2017. Results: Univariate analysis revealed that the injury severity score, intubation, pulse pressure, focused assessment with sonography in trauma positivity score, and pH were different between the pre-CT (34 patients, 48.6%) and post-CT (all, p<0.05) groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that injury severity score (ISS) and intubation were factors affecting the decision to perform CVC before CT (p=0.003 and p=0.043). Regarding clinical outcomes, the interval from ED arrival to CT (p=0.011) and definite bleeding control (p=0.038), and hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay (p=0.018 and p=0.053) were longer in the pre-CT group than in the post-CT group. Although not significant, the pre-CT group had lower survival rates at 24 hours and 28 days than the post-CT group (p=0.168 and p=0.226). Conclusions: Clinicians have a tendency to perform CVC before CT in patients with blunt major trauma and high ISS and intubation.

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.155-160
• /
• 2005

Background: Falls are a major cause of emergency room visits. Injury secondary to falls is a largely preventable public health problem. This study helps to better understand the epidemiology of falls from height, then develops prevention strategies. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 192 patients admitted to the emergency department of Konyang university hospital with a history of falls from January 2004 to December 2004. Collected data included the patient's age, gender, height of fall and method, outcome of management, Injury Severity Score(ISS). Results: According to the characteristics of height of fall, the ISS was higher when the patient fell from height of 2 meters or more($13.79{\pm}12.17$) than not($8.13{\pm}9.25$)(p<0.05). There were positive correlation between mean age and ISS(p<0.001, r=0.7). To gender, ISS was higher in the male group($12.73{\pm}11.78$) than the female group($8.48{\pm}10.00$)(p<0.05). Conclusion: Falls often results from multiple concurrent problems including environmental and behavioral factors. This study suggests that we need to improve the occupational environment, especially above 2meters, for decreasing injuries of fall from heights. Also we consider the prevention of children from injuries of fall from heights.

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.68-75
• /
• 2016

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of regional trauma center's management. Methods: Data collected between January 2013 and December 2015 from a regional trauma center registry was retrospectively reviewed. The patients who had injury severity score (ISS) greater than 15 and over the age of 18 were included. We compared annual general characteristics, the injury mechanism, the pathway of transportation, the injury severity score, the length of stay in emergency department (ED) and hospital, the in-hospital mortality. Results: The annual numbers of enrolled patients were 337, 334 and 278, respectively. No significant differences were found in the annual patient's median ages, injury mechanism, ISS and in-hospital mortality. The annual proportions of coming from other hospital and the median length of stay in hospital were increased after establishment of regional trauma center. The annual median lengths of stay in ED were decreased remarkably. Conclusion: Through the establishment of regional trauma center, the length of stay in ED can be reduced but not in-hospital mortality. More multidisciplinary cooperation and well-organized study is needed to reduce mortality of major trauma patients and maximize effect of regional trauma center.

• 대한정형외과학회지
• /
• 제55권5호
• /
• pp.383-396
• /
• 2020

목적: 중등도 이상의 손상 환자를 대상으로 손상의 중증도에 따른 정형외과적 손상의 손상기전, 부위, 유형, 치료적 접근 및 그 치료결과를 분석하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 2014년부터 2019년까지 응급실/외상센터가 운영되지 않은 기간을 제외한 57개월 동안 국립중앙의료원 외상센터로 입원한 손상 중증도 점수(Injury Severity Score, ISS) 9점 이상의 환자들 중 정형외과적 손상이 동반된 778명을 대상으로 후향적 연구를 시행하였다. ISS와 생리학적 지표를 기준으로 한 손상의 중증도에 따라 중등도 손상군(1군, 679명)과 중증 손상군(2군, 99명)으로 분류하고 손상기전, 비정형외과적 손상을 평가하였다. 정형외과적 손상은 침범된 해부학적 영역과 골격구조의 수와 유형을 평가하였고, 치료적 접근 방법을 세분화하여 비교하였다. 치료결과는 재원기간을 포함하여 재원기간 내 발현된 전신 합병증과 사망률을 평가하였고 사망률에 미치는 요인을 분석하였다. 결과: 2군이 보다 젊고, 남성의 빈도가 높았고 고에너지 손상기전 및 동반 손상의 빈도가 유의하게 증가되었다. 정형외과적 손상 중 침범된 골격계의 수는 2군에서 유의하게 많아지면서 하지를 주로 침범한 1군에 비해 2군에서는 골반, 척추, 상지 영역의 침범이 유의하게 증가하였다. 정형외과적 손상은 환자의 임상적 상태에 따라 확정적 또는 단계적 치료가 시행되었으며 다발성 중증 손상을 보이는 2군에서는 일시적 외고정술을 이용한 단계적 수술의 빈도가 유의하게 높았고 1군에서는 생리학적 안정화를 이룬 뒤 확정적 수술을 시행하는 빈도가 유의하게 높았다. 중증도가 높아질수록 재원기간 역시 길어졌으며 재원기간 내 총 전신 합병증은 약 4.9%, 총 사망률는 약 4.5%였다. 중증도가 높아질수록 사망률은 유의하게 높아졌다(1군 2.9%, 2군 15.2%; p<0.0001). 사망률에 미치는 요인 중 고령과 높은 ISS가 중요한 요인으로 확인되었다. 결론: 손상의 중등도가 높을수록 고에너지 손상기전에 의한 손상의 발생 빈도가 높아지며 보다 젊고, 남성의 빈도와 동반 손상의 빈도가 높아졌다. 정형외과적 손상 역시 다발성 손상의 빈도와 중증도가 유의하게 증가되면서 정형외과적 외고정장치를 이용한 내고정술 등이 단계적 치료의 일환으로 시행된 경우가 유의하게 높아지는 경향을 보였다. 또한 재원기간, 전신 합병증 및 사망률 역시 유의하게 증가되는 경향을 보이며, 사망률에는 높은 연령과 ISS가 중요한 영향을 미치는 것으로 확인되었다.

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.3-12
• /
• 2021

Purpose: To evaluate the severity of trauma, many scoring systems and predictive models have been presented. The quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) is a simple scoring system based on vital signs, and we expect it to be easier to apply to trauma patients than other trauma assessment tools. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study of trauma patients who visited the emergency department of Jeju National University Hospital. We excluded patients under the age of 18 years and unknown outcomes. We calculated the qSOFA, the Modified Early Warning Score (mEWS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and Injury Severity Score (ISS) based on patients' initial vital signs and assessments performed in the emergency department (ED). The primary outcome was mortality within 14 days of trauma. We analyzed qSOFA scores using multivariate logistic regression analysis and compared the predictive accuracy of these scoring systems using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results: In total, 27,764 patients were analyzed. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis of the qSOFA, the adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI) for mortality relative to a qSOFA score of 0 were 27.82 (13.63-56.79) for a qSOFA score of 1, 373.31 (183.47-759.57) for a qSOFA score of 2, and 494.07 (143.75-1698.15) for a qSOFA score of 3. In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for the qSOFA, mEWS, ISS, and RTS in predicting the outcomes, for mortality, the AUROC for the qSOFA (AUROC [95% CI]; 0.912 [0.871-0.952]) was significantly greater than those for the ISS (0.700 [0.608-0.793]) and RTS (0.160 [0.108-0.211]). Conclusions: The qSOFA was useful for predicting the prognosis of trauma patients evaluated in the ED.

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.223-229
• /
• 2012

Purpose: The arterial base deficit and the serum lactate level are widely recognized indicators of injury severity, adequacy of resuscitation and outcome. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of the arterial base deficit as an injury-severity indicator in multiple-trauma patients with head injuries. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from trauma patients over 18 years of age who had been admitted at the emergency center between October 2005 and July 2006. The patients were divided into head-injury and non-head-injury groups. These patients were then sub-divided into minor ($$ISS{\leq_-}15$$)-injury and major ($$ISS{\geq_-}16$$)-injury groups according to their injury severity scores (ISS). We analyzed the differences in the base deficits and the serum lactate levels between the major- and the minor-injury sub-groups in both the head-injury and the non-head-injury groups. Results: In the non-head-injury group, we found statistically significant differences in the arterial base deficit between the major-injury and the minor-injury sub-groups($-6.86{\pm}2.40mmol/L$ vs. $-1.37{\pm}0.73mmol/L$, p=0.010). In the head-injury group, no significant differences were noted between the two sub-groups($-2.50{\pm}1.28mmol/L$ vs. $-1.51{\pm}0.74mmol/L$, p=0.897). Moreover, the differences in arterial base deficit between the major-injury and the minor-injury sub-groups were not significant both for either single-head-trauma or multiple-head-trauma patients (p=0.643 vs. p=0.832). Conclusion: We conclude that neither the arterial base deficit nor the serum lactate level can be used to predict injury severity in multiple-trauma patients with head injuries.

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.268-276
• /
• 2022

Purpose: Rib fractures are common injuries that can lead to morbidity and mortality. Methods: Data on all patients with rib fractures admitted to a single trauma center between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2018 were reviewed. Results: A total of 1,671 admissions for rib fracture were examined. Patients' median age was 57 years, the median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 14, and the median number of fractured ribs was three. The in-hospital mortality rate was 4%. Age, the number of rib fractures, and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were poor predictors of mortality, while the ISS was a slightly better predictor, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.60, 0.55, 0.58, and 0.74, respectively. Multivariate regression showed that age, ISS, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score, but not the number of rib fractures, were associated with significantly elevated adjusted odds ratios for mortality (1.03, 1.14, and 1.28, respectively). Conclusions: Age, ISS, and comorbidities were independently associated with the risk of mortality; however, they were not accurate predictors of death. The factors associated with rib fracture mortality are complex and cannot be explained by a single variable. Interventions to improve outcomes must be multifaceted.