• Title/Summary/Keyword: Initial and recurrent shoulder dislocation

Search Result 6, Processing Time 0.024 seconds

Initial and Recurrent Anterior Dislocation in Shoulder (견관절 초기 전방 탈구와 재발성 전방 탈구)

  • Kim Young-Kyu;Lee Jae-Hoon;Kim Hyun-Min;Lee Choong-Hoon
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • v.8 no.2
    • /
    • pp.148-153
    • /
    • 2005
  • Purpose: To assess the usefulness of early stabilization for initial shoulder dislocation which is indicated in some patients by comparing the arthroscopic findings and the outcomes of Bankart repair in the initial and recurrent dislocation. Materials and Methods: The study was performed on 16 cases of initial dislocation and 44 cases of recurrent dislocation. The follow-up period was 25 months in the initial dislocation group and 28 months in the recurrent group. Bankart lesion and the adjacent tissues were compared, and the results were evaluated by the Rowe rating scale. Results: Detached labrum and capsular ligament of the initial dislocation group were elastic and unretracted. While in the recurrent dislocation those were inelastic, and displaced and adhesive in many cases. The outcomes were mean 95 points in the initial group and 91 points in the recurrent group. In the initial group, apprehension was detected in only 1 case(6%). In the recurrent group, instability was detected in 4 cases(9%). Conclusion: Our data suggest that Bankart lesion in the initial dislocation can be repaired readily by surgery, the recovery is efficient, and the recurrence would be reduced. Thus, in active young sports lovers as well as athletes, early stabilization surgery for initial shoulder dislocation may be more helpful.

Open Versus Arthroscopic Technique in the Traumatic Recurrent Anterior Dislocation of the Shoulder (견관절 전방 재발성 탈구에 대한 관혈적 술식과 관절경적 술식의 결과 비교)

  • Kyung, Hee-Soo;Jeon, In-Ho;Kim, Sung-Jung;Yeo, Jun-Young
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • v.5 no.2
    • /
    • pp.110-117
    • /
    • 2002
  • Purpose: We compared the results of open and arthroscopic Bankart repair in traumatic recurrent anterior dislocation ,3f the shoulder. Materials and methods: We analysed 7 cases underwent open Bankart repair (group I) and 13 cases underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair (group Ⅱ). The average follow-up period was 68.1 months (51-113 months) in group I and 41.1 months (16~57 months) in group Ⅱ. All patients in group I and Ⅱ were non-athletes. We analyzed statistically objective evaluation, such as the stability of shoulder joint, the range of motion, pain, impaired throwing, Bankart rating system by Rowe and subjective evaluation, visual analog scale (VAS) between two groups. Results: In terms of dominant and non-dominant shoulders, the age at initial episode of dislocation, the elapsed time from injury to surgery, the number of preoperative dislocations associated with susceptibility to apprehension. respectively, there was no statistically significant differences between two groups. In group I the average Rowe's scortls was 84.3 and 3 cases (43%) had excellent results,4 cases (S7cfo), good ones. In group H the average Rowe's scores was 87.3 and 7 cases (54%) had excellent results,6 cases, good ones. There was tendency to show more excellent results in group ll, but there was no statistically significant differences. The average VAS were 90.3 points in group I and 88 points in group Ⅱ, which showed also no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: Open and arthroscopic Bankart repairs had no significant difference and showed also good results in travinatic recurrent anterior dislocation of shoulder.

Risk Factors for Recurrence of Anterior Shoulder Instability after Arthroscopic Surgery with Suture Anchors

  • Choi, Chang-Hyuk;Kim, Seok-Jun;Chae, Seung-Bum;Lee, Jae-Keun;Kim, Dong-Young
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • v.19 no.2
    • /
    • pp.78-83
    • /
    • 2016
  • Background: We investigated the risk factors for the recurrence of anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic surgery with suture anchors and the clinical outcomes after reoperation. Methods: A total of 281 patients (February 2001 to December 2012) were enrolled into our study, and postoperative subluxation and dislocation were considered as recurrence of the condition. We analyzed radiologic results and functional outcome including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation Form, the Korean Shoulder Society Score, and the Rowe scores. Results: Of the 281 patients, instability recurred in 51 patients (18.1%). Sixteen out of 51 patients (31.4%) received a reoperation. In terms of the functional outcome, we found that the intact group, comprising patients without recurrence, had a significantly better functional outcome than those in the recurrent group. The size of glenoid defect at the time of initial surgery significantly differed between intact and recurrent group (p<0.05). We found that the number of dislocations, the time from the initial presentation of symptoms to surgery, and the number of anchor points significantly differed between initial operation and revision group (p<0.05). The functional outcome after revision surgery was comparable to intact group after initial operation. Conclusions: Eighteen percent of recurrence occurred after arthroscopic instability surgery, and 5.6% received reoperation surgery. Risk factors for recurrence was the initial size of glenoid defect. In cases of revision surgery, good clinical outcomes could be achieved using additional suture anchor.

The Prognostic Factor Analysis Through Rowe Scoring System in Arthroscopic Bankart Operation Used Suture-anchor Method (Suture-anchor를 이용한 관절경적 Bankart 술식에서의 Rowe 점수를 통한 예후 인자 분석)

  • Han Jae-Hyeung;Seo Jae-Sung
    • Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
    • /
    • v.7 no.1
    • /
    • pp.81-86
    • /
    • 2003
  • Purpose : The clinical consequences of arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchor with non-absorbable suture as well as various factors, expected to have an effect on the prognosis of disease, have been evaluated and compared through preoperative and postoperative modified Rowe score. Materials and Methods : Twenty-eight cases were evaluated for the subject of this study, which enabled us to follow up at least for more than 18 months from lune, 1997 to May, 2001. Modified Rowe score was used for the evaluation of preoperative and follow-up shoulder function and stability. After setting up 9 factors expected to affect a prognosis, a statistical verification was conducted. Results : The postoperative Rowe score was 87.3, while preoperative Rowe score was 28.4 and the Rowe score was improved significantly(p=0.000). There were 1 case of redislocation and 2 cases of limitation of motion in the shoulder. In prognostic factor analysis through Rowe scoring system. Rowe score of their age at a trauma under 20 years was greater than that of above 20 years and it was significant(p=0.023). Conclusion : It was thought that arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchor was one or useful treatment method for recurrent shoulder dislocation patients. It was considered that their age at initial trauma was the factor to affect a prognosis.

  • PDF