• 트랜스-
• /
• 제15권
• /
• pp.81-104
• /
• 2023

본 논문은 헨리 젠킨스가 제안한 참여문화 개념으로 탄막 현상을 분석한다. 탄막은 다른 댓글이나 달리 이용자들이 동영상을 볼 때 익명으로 글을 올릴 수 있도록 하고, 그 시간에 올린 댓글은 곧바로 화면에 뜨는 동시에 다른 시청자도 볼 수 있게 하는 기능으로, 2006년에 일본의 유명한 동영상 사이트인 나코니코(Niconico)에서 처음으로 서비스를 시작하였다. 본 논문에서는 중국 동영상 플랫폼 Bilibili에서의 탄막 현상을 세가지 측면에 집중하여 분석한다. 첫째, 집단지성 하의 창작 공유 측면에서는 사용자들이 자신의 창작물을 만들어 탄막을 통해 다른 이용자들과 공유하는 것이 어떻게 이루어지는지 탐구한다. 둘째, 대중 참여 하의 협력 모델에서는 사용자들이 상호작용을 통해 집단적인 협력을 구현하는 방법과 그 의미에 대해 다룬다. 셋째, 상업자본의 재력 지원 측면에서는 탄막 동영상이 상업적인 이익을 창출하는 영향력을 사례로 분석한다. 또한, Bilibili에서 나타나는 참여문화의 부정적 측면과 도전 과제를 분석한다. 참여격차, 저작권 침해, 그리고 탄막의 과도한 사용과 익명성의 문제와 같은 부정적 측면들을 검토하고 참여문화로서 탄막의 가능성을 실현하기 위한 주요 도전 과제들을 제안하였다. 본 논문은 문헌조사, 사례연구 등 연구 방법을 활용하여 탄막을 종합적으로 분석하고, 이를 통해 참여문화와 탄막이 현대사회에서 어떻게 상호작용하며 진화하는지에 대한 통찰을 도출하고자 하였다. 탄막은 참여적인 매체로서 개인과 집단의 창작과 상호작용을 촉진하는 중요한 도구로서 미디어 산업과 사용자들 사이의 새로운 경계를 개척하고 있지만 그 가능성을 실현하기 위해서는 여러 과제를 해결해야 함을 논의하였다.

• 미술이론과 현장
• /
• 제4호
• /
• pp.123-144
• /
• 2006

Foreigners who arrived in Korea after the age of enlightenment were Japanese, Chinese and 'Westerners' who were Europeans and Americans. The westerners were diplomats who visited Korea for colonization or for increasing their economical profits by trading after the spread of imperialism, and tourists curious of back countries, artists, explores and missionaries to perform their roles for their religious beliefs. They contacted with Korean cultural and educational people as missionaries and instructors during Japanese colonial period. In 1945, the allied forces occupied Korea under the name of takeover of Japanese colony after Japan's surrender and the relation between foreigners and Korean cultured men enter upon a new phase. For 3 years, American soldiers enforced lots of systems in Korea and many pro-American people were educated. This relationship lasted even after the establishment of the government of Korean Republic and especially, diplomats called as pro-Korean group came again after Korean War. Among them, there were lots of foreigners interested in cultures and arts. In particular, government officials under American Forces who were influential on political circles or diplomats widened their insights toward Korean cultural assets and collected them a lot. Those who were in Korea from the period of independence to 1950s wrote their impressions about Korean cultural assets on newspapers or journals after visiting contemporary Korean exhibitions. Among them, A. J. McTaggart, Richard Hertz and the Hendersons were dominant. They thought the artists had great interests in compromising and uniting the Orient and the West based on their knowledge of Korean cultural assets and they advised. However, it was different from Korean artist's point of view that the foreigners thought Korean art adhered oriental features and contained western contents. From foreigners' point of view, it is hard to understand the attitude Korean artists chose to keep their self-respect through experiencing the Korean war. It is difficult to distinguish their thought about Korean art based on their exotic taste from the Korean artists' local and peninsular features under Japanese imperialism. We can see their thought about Korean art and their viewpoint toward the third world, after staying in Korea for a short period and being a member of the first world. The basic thing was that they could see the potentialities through the worldwide, beautiful Korean cultural assets and they thought it was important to start with traditions. It is an evidence showing Korean artists' pride in regard to the art culture through experiencing the infringement of their country. By writing about illuminating Korean art from the third party's view, foreigners represented their thoughts through it that their economical, military superiority goes with their cultural superiority. The Korean artist's thought of emphasizing Korean history and traditions, reexamining and using it as an original creation may have been inspired by westerners' writings. 'The establishment of national art' that Korean artists gave emphasis then, didn't only affect one of the reactions toward external impact, 'the adhesion of tradition'. In the process of introducing Korean contemporary art and national treasure in America, different view caused by role differences-foreigner as selector and Korean as assistant-showed the fact evidently that the standard of beauty differed between them. By emphasizing that the basis to classify Korean cultural assets is different from the neighborhood China and Japan, they tried to reflect their understanding that the feature of Korean art is on speciality other than universality. And this make us understand that even when Korean artists profess modernism, they stress that the roots are on Korean and oriental tradition. It was obviously a different thought from foreigners' view on Korean art that Korean artists' conception of modernism and traditional roots are inherent in Korean history. In 1950s, after the independence, Korea had different ideas from foreigners that abstract was to be learned from the west. Korea was enduring tough times with their artists' self-respect which made them think that they can learn the method, but the spirit of abstract is in the orient.