• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제7권6호
• /
• pp.53-64
• /
• 2007

The idea that city culture can be employed as a driver for urban development has become part of the new orthodoxy by which cities seek to enhance their competitive position. Such development reflect not only the rise to prominence of the cultural sphere in the city development, but also how the meaning of culture has been refined to include new uses in order to meet the main objectives of sustainable development. This study focuses on the procedure how the cultural infrastructure and historical context can be applied for urban regeneration strategy. Two successful cases (Bilbao, Spain and Yokohama, Japan) were selected for analysis of strategies as a whole, background, main characteristics of culture-led urban regeneration strategies and their effect for urban regeneration have been analyzed in detail. In conclusion, lessons for the future development were suggested in terms of resources, planning and linking strategies.

• 한국수자원학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2002년도 학술발표회 논문집(I)
• /
• pp.301-304
• /
• 2002

• 한국지리정보학회지
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.144-155
• /
• 2014

과거 성장 중심의 산업화 과정에서 형성된 대규모 산업단지를 비롯한 공업지역이 기반시설 부족과 노후화로 인해 지방도시의 도시경쟁력을 악화시키는 요인으로 작용하고 있다. 이러한 인식하에 최근들어 정부주도의 노후산업단지 재생사업이 시범적으로 추진되고 있으나 지역마다의 산업단지의 형성여건과 물리적 환경이 상이하여 획일화된 재생계획의 우려가 있는 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 과거 민간주도로 조성된 부산 사상공업지역을 사례로 지역의 사회적 여건과 물리적 현황을 바탕으로 지역특성을 진단하고 재생방향을 제시하고자 하였다. 분석결과 사례지역은 사회적 측면에서 시역확장에 따른 입지적 도시기능 변화와 김해, 양산 등 주변도시의 급격한 성장에 따른 기업유출로 공업기능의 잠식, 물리적 여건측면에서는 기반시설 미흡 및 개발압력 가중으로 요약된다. 이를 바탕으로 향후 수립할 재생정책의 방향으로서 계획수립단계에서는 공공주도의 기반시설 확충에 우선하고 시범적으로 일부지역에 대한 우선정비구역 지정을 통한 전면철거방식 적용이 필요하다. 실행단계에서는 중장기적 관점에서 단계적 사업이 필요하며 협력적 거버넌스 구축을 통한 재생사업 추진과정에서 기업과의 공감대 형성이 중요할 것으로 여겨진다.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.89-113
• /
• 2020

도시재생사업에서 도서관은 기초생활인프라 중 하나로 필수적으로 고려되어야할 시설이다. 단순한 기초생활인프라로서의 의미를 넘어 도서관이 도시재생의 참여 주체로서 그 기능과 역할을 효과적으로 수행하기 위해서는 기존 도시재생 사업에서 도서관들의 역할 및 성격, 참여형태을 먼저 이해할 필요가 있다. 이에 본 연구는 도시재생사업 관련 전략계획의 내용에서 도서관과 관련된 내용을 조사하고, 도시재생 참여 주체로서의 도서관의 역할과 참여형태 차원에서 고찰하였다. 이를 통해 도시재생의 도서관이 향후 도시재생 참여 주체로서의 그 역할과 기능을 극대화할 수 있는 방향을 모색하고자 하였다. 연구 결과, 도시재생 내 도서관은 주거환경의 질 제고, 도시 활력증진, 생활밀착형 문화적·교육적·사회/복지적 역할, 지역 내 커뮤니티 허브로서의 역할이 기대되고 있다고 볼 수 있다. 또한, 도서관의 참여형태는 크게 지역·지리적 특화도서관, 다양한 서비스와 결합한 하이브리드 도서관, 지역사회 협력과 연계를 기반으로 한 도서관, 주민 참여를 기반으로 한 지역 커뮤니티 허브형 도서관으로 구분해 볼 수 있었다. 향후 도서관은 도시재생의 참여 주체로서 기대되는 5가지 역할을 바탕으로 보다 적극적인 역할 변화를 도모할 필요가 있다. 또한, 도서관이 도시재생 거점시설로서 그 역할을 성공적으로 수행하기 위해 도서관 서비스의 주체인 사서, 서비스, 프로그램 등에 대한 보다 세부적인 논의가 도시재생 계획 수립시에 필요할 것으로 보인다.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.131-138
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this paper is to identify the determinants of spillover effects of regional regeneration projects. This finds that the effects are positively determined by population sizes of regions and degree of industrial specialization of regeneration related industries. In particular, the improvement of accessibility through the development of transportation infrastructure facilities can contribute to increases of economic impacts of regeneration projects of high-income regions on the lagged regions. Microeconomic approaches and dynamic modelling need to be integrated for this impact analysis as further research fields.

• 토지주택연구
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.55-58
• /
• 2017

This short paper is about the background, progress, achievement as well as the direction of Urban Regeneration (UR) Policy since 2013 in Korea. The UR in Korea has been recognized and initiated late compared to UK, Japan as well as many other countries that have achieved economic growth earlier than Korea. In 2013, the Special Law on UR established and the UR project has begun in earnest. However, there are still a number of pending issues required to be resolved for the regeneration of declining cities. After reviewing the background of UR in Korea, we would go through the progress and achievement of UR and then we look at the follow-up measures required to be resolved in short period as well as longer term for successful UR.

• 토지주택연구
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to suggest diagnosis indicators and checklist for urban regeneration projects by Korea Land & Housing Corporation(LH). There are already deprivation indices in the Urban Regeneration Act but not any additional guidelines in the practical aspect. In order to use the diagnosis indicators, the central government should supply more specific checklist to the actors in the regeneration field. The key actor of many stakeholders is LH as an operator and implementer in the regeneration projects. So far, LH has developed housing and cities and there haven't been any obvious changes to realize public benefit in the deteriorated area. From now on, It has to plan, implement, and manage a lot of regeneration projects entirely. Therefore, It is necessary to develope and apply the diagnosis indicators and checklist based on projects. This paper came up with the 6 factors related with LH business field : housing, urban infrastructure, public service, private service, environment, and smart city. For these, 32 diagnosis indicators and 72 checklists were selected that can include both physical and qualitative indicators. These can be used not only for the selection of regeneration projects but also for the process monitoring such as planning and implementation.

• 한국농촌건축학회논문집
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.41-48
• /
• 2013

The study aims to figure out the problems of Daldongnae (hillside shantytown) in Jaman-dong, Jeonju, and to propose the countermeasures for village regeneration. Based on the survey of current conditions in the area and the case study of successful regeneration projects, this study suggests regenerating concepts for the community. The study on the current state analyzes that Jaman-dong is faced with the population decline, especially among the young, the lack of community facilities and infrastructure, and the unfavorable situation in the residential environment. The case study involves three successful Daldongnae regeneration projects: the culture-based regeneration of Cultural Village (in Gamcheon-dong, Busan), the regeneration focused on healthcare and education of Ibagugil (in Choryang-dong, Busan), and the community-led regeneration of Rainbow Village (in Dae-dong, Daejeon). The regenerating concepts for the community are as follows: utilizing the existing local community center as a gathering place for the residents, furnishing a cultural space for a growing number of visitors, adding new parking space, installing convenient facilities in order to provide better pedestrian environment for the disabled and elderly, improving street landscapes, and establishing citizen participation programs.

• 토지주택연구
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.59-71
• /
• 2017

With the passing of Special Act on Promotion and Support for Urban Regeneration (will be hereafter referred to as the Urban Regeneration Special Act) in December 2013, urban regeneration projects have begun in full scale. 13 regions including Jongno District, Seoul were selected as the urban regeneration leading area in 2014 and 33 regions as urban regeneration general regions in 2015 to push ahead a nationwide urban regeneration front supported by government funds. However, it is not clear if these urban regeneration projects will be revitalized by the sole means of government's financial support. Above all, cooperation among all interested parties including the central government that is propelling urban regeneration, local governments, state corporations, private entities, and citizens is urgent. In an urban regeneration project, delegation between state and private entities is absolutely crucial. The central government and the pertinent local government must provide their support by forming new policies and repairing old institutions that are right for urban regeneration, securing the necessary subsidy, and outsourcing government-owned land development. A state corporation must play its part in every aspect that requires public character such as an overall project management of an urban regeneration project, cooperation with the local government, and infrastructure installation. The private stakeholder must share his private capital and know-hows as a construction investor and a development businessman to make possible a successful urban regeneration project. In order for these public and private entities to cooperate with one another, it is necessary to reestablish the role of a public developer and contemplate running an urban regeneration project that permeates public character through a public developer.

• 토지주택연구
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.33-53
• /
• 2017

The UK Government's approach to how to deliver regeneration in its towns and cities has changed considerably in recent years. Traditionally, urban regeneration policy focused on reversing physical, economic and social decline in an area where market forces would not do this without intervention. Since 2010 urban regeneration has become a vital part of the Government's approach to increasing local growth and competitiveness and building a strong and balanced economy. The current emphasis is on a place-based approach to regeneration that builds on the particular strengths of different places to drive growth and addresses the factors that hold them back. This paper outlines the key features of current UK urban regeneration policy and how interventions to support regeneration and growth are being pursued at different spatial scales to ensure all parts of the country benefit. They include pan regional initiatives like the Northern Powerhouse and Midlands Way, to groups of local authorities operating at a sub regional level (combined authorities/city regions), Local Enterprise Partnerships, and a variety of smaller scale programmes delivering regeneration in areas of economic and social decline. The paper explains some of the policy instruments and funding programmes available to support regeneration, and provides case studies of some major urban regeneration projects that illustrate the new approach including housing and infrastructure improvements like the planned High Speed Rail 2 line. These are supporting regeneration through the creation of strategic partnerships involving government, places and investors. The paper concludes with some lessons from past and future regeneration schemes to improve their effectiveness and impact on places and enhance local growth potential.