• Title/Summary/Keyword: Indirect coal liquefaction (ICL)

Search Result 5, Processing Time 0.021 seconds

Economic Evaluations of Direct/indirect Coal Liquefaction Processes (직.간접석탄액화공정의 경제성 평가)

  • Park, Joo-Won;Bae, Jong-Soo;Kweon, Yeong-Jin;Kim, Hak-Joo;Jung, Heon;Han, Choon
    • 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2009.06a
    • /
    • pp.857-860
    • /
    • 2009
  • This report examines the economic feasibility of a commercial 50,000 barrel per day direct/indirect coal liquefaction (DCL/ICL) facility to produce commercial-grade diesel and naphtha liquids from medium-sulfur bituminous coal. The scope of the study includes capital and operating cost estimates, sensitivity analysis and a comparative financial analysis. Based on plant capacity of 50,000BPD, employing Illinois #6 bituminous coal as feed coal the total capital cost appeared $3,994,858,000(DCL) and $4,942,976,000(ICL). Also, the internal rate of return of DCL/ICL appeared 13.27% and 12.68% on the base condition. In this case, coal price and sale price of products were the most influence factors. And ICL's payback period(6.8 years) was longer than DCL's (6.6 years). According to sensitivity analyses, the important factors on DCL/ICL processes were product sale price, feed coal price and the capital cost in order.

  • PDF

Trends of Direct/Indirect Coal Liquefaction Technologies (직·간접 석탄액화 기술 동향)

  • Park, Joo-Won;Park, Chulhwan;Kim, Hak-Joo;Jung, Heon;Han, Choon
    • Korean Chemical Engineering Research
    • /
    • v.46 no.2
    • /
    • pp.248-257
    • /
    • 2008
  • Coal liquefaction technology was established in Germany in 1920s. Coal liquefaction refers to the process in which coal is converted into liquid fuels such as gasoline and diesel oil under certain conditions. Coal liquefaction is usually classified into direct coal liquefaction (DCL) and indirect coal liquefaction (ICL). Various technologies for coal liquefaction, conducted between 1970s and 2000s, resulted in the development and optimization of a communication ready technology for the production of petroleum substitutes as refinery feedstocks. The purpose of this paper is to review the research, development and demonstration of coal liquefaction. In these respects, various DCL and ICL processes under development were illustrated and compared. Also, the status and perspective of coal liquefaction projects in the world were viewed. Considering the scale, and technical difficulties of domestic coal liquefaction, the project has be leaded by the government.

Economic Evaluations of DCL/ICL Processes (직·간접석탄액화공정의 경제성 평가)

  • Park, Joo-Won;Bae, Jong-Soo;Kweon, Yeong-jin;Kim, Hak-Joo;Jung, Heon;Han, Choon
    • Korean Chemical Engineering Research
    • /
    • v.47 no.6
    • /
    • pp.781-787
    • /
    • 2009
  • This report investigates the economic proprieties of commercial 50,000 barrel per day direct/indirect coal liquefaction(DCL/ICL) plants to produce commercial-grade diesel and naphtha liquids. The scope of the study includes capital and operating cost estimates, sensitivity analyses and a comparative financial analyses. Based on plant capacity of 50,000BPD, employing Illinois #6 bituminous coal as feed coal, the total capital cost appeared $3,994,858,000(DCL) and $4,962,263,000(ICL). Also, the internal rate of return of DCL/ICL appeared 13.27% and 12.68% on the base condition respectively. In this case, coal price and sale price of products were the most influence factors. And ICL's payback period(6.8 years) was longer than DCL's(6.6 years). According to sensitivity analyses, the important factors on both DCL/ICL processes were product sale price, feed coal price and the capital cost in order.

A Study on the Economic Validity of Hybrid Coal-to-Liquid process (Hybrid형 석탄액화 공정의 경제적 타당성에 관한 연구)

  • Park, Joo-Won;Bae, Jong-Soo;Kweon, Yeong-Jin;Kim, Hak-Joo;Jung, Heon;Han, Choon
    • 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2010.06a
    • /
    • pp.109.1-109.1
    • /
    • 2010
  • Hybrid형 석탄액화 공정은 직접액화 (Direct Coal Liquefaction, DCL)공정과 간접액화 (Indirect Coal Liquefaction, ICL)공정으로 구성 되며, 공정의 경제성을 분석하기위하여 주요 제품 (디젤, 납사) 생산량이 50,000barrel per day (BPD)의 Hybrid형 석탄액화공정을 선정하고 공정에 적합한 검토기준을 세워 건설비용 및 매출액등을 산정하였다. 또한 석탄액화공정에 대한 중요 변수들의 가격 변동에 따른 민감도 분석을 실시하였다. 생산량을 기준으로 선정된 원료탄(Illinois #6 유연탄)의 사용하였을 때, 총 투자액은 $4,114,730,000 로 나타났으며, 고정비는 $93,610,000, 변동비는 $407,225,000으로 분석되었다. 경제성 분석결과 내부수익률 (internal rate of return, IRR)은 기본조건에서 11.48%로 나타났으며, 순현가(net present value, NPV)는 $526,478,000으로 나타났다. 원금상환 기간은 6.9년으로 나타났으며, 민감도 분석 결과 제품가격, 원료석탄가격, 건설비의 변동률 순서로 수익률에 변화를 주는 것으로 나타났다. 민감도가 가장 높은 제품 가격 25% 상승 시, IRR과 NPV는 각각 17.24%, $2,804,919,000로 나타났다.

  • PDF

The Status and Prospect of CTL (Coal-to-Liquid) (CTL(Coal-to-Liquid) 기술 현황)

  • Jung, Heon;Yang, Jung-Il;Kim, Hak-Joo;Chun, Dong-Hyun
    • Journal of Energy Engineering
    • /
    • v.16 no.2
    • /
    • pp.64-72
    • /
    • 2007
  • During the 2nd World War, several Coal-to-Liquid (CTL) plants were operated in Germany and England to convert coal to large volumes of liquid fuel. Big oil fields discovered in the Middle East after the war supplied crude oil at the low price and all CTL plants were forced to shut down. However, South Africa (Sasol) built a CTL plant in 1955 and 2 more plants afterward and the current production of coal-derived synfuel reached 150,000 bbl/day. Recently, the sustained high crude oil price and the fear of the "peak oil" rejuvenated the interest of CTL and several CTL projects are in progress. China established a plan to build CTL plants with the total capacity of 30 million tons of synfuel per year by 2030. China is building a direct coal liquefaction plant which is scheduled to produce 20,000bbl/day of synfuel in 2008. There are 8 CTL projects in USA either in the planning stage or in the ground-breaking stage. CTL projects are also carried out in Australia, Philippines, New Zealand, Indonesia and India. Korea needs to approach the CTL project in the perspective of the national energy security. In this paper, the history, the status, current activities and the prospect of CTL are described.