• Title/Summary/Keyword: IAQG

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

A Study on Certification Activities on Aerospace Quality Management System (항공 품질경영시스템 인증활동에 관한 연구)

  • Lee, Sung-Ju;Byun, Jai-Hyun
    • Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management
    • /
    • v.35 no.3
    • /
    • pp.88-99
    • /
    • 2007
  • The AS9100 aerospace standard has become the aerospace quality management system standard instead of ISO9001 and MIL-Q-9858A by international aerospace manufacturing companies. The organization which adopts AS9100 standard is to be certified by an independent third party certification body as IAQG requests. The quality management system certification assessor shall utilize the AS9101 standard prepared by IAQG to assess AS9100 organization. In this paper, AS9101 quality system questionnaire is analyzed and scoring method which characterizes AS9101 is reviewed. Score attained can be utilized as an organizational quality index. Practical data gathered by certified assessors from 2002 to 2007 are analyzed and suggested to improve the organization's system operational efficiency based on the analysis results. Suggestions can be utilized by any organization to prepare assessment or to enhance the level of quality system maturity. This study is applicable to the future as well as present aerospace manufacturing activities throughout the world.

A Study on Improvement in Quality System Evaluation for Production Approval of Aircraft and Parts (항공기 및 부품 생산승인을 위한 품질시스템 평가기준 개선 연구)

  • Kang-Yi Lee;Jae-Hoon Han;Jung-Sam Lee
    • Journal of Aerospace System Engineering
    • /
    • v.17 no.6
    • /
    • pp.118-126
    • /
    • 2023
  • Most of the aerospace industries establish the SAE AS9100 Quality Management System, and acquire commercial certification by the 3rd party. Nevertheless, they repeatably have to cope with similar quality system evaluation by the airworthiness authority for the production certificate, parts manufacturer approval, and technical standard order authorization in accordance with the applicable regulations. The current quality system evaluation criteria of the airworthiness authority could be recommended for reforms in order to reduce duplication and correspond to the industrial development and environmental changes. In this paper, we propose measures to reform the authority's evaluation criteria through comparative analysis among the IAQG SAE AS9100, the FAA quality system codes, and the MOLIT ACSEP requirements.