• 가족자원경영과 정책
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.45-62
• /
• 2006

This research is carried out to inspect the Apartment Management System of Japan, to examine the similarities and differences between the Korean Apartment Management System and the Japanese Apartment Management System. First, as the basis law of apartment management, there exists the Building Unit Ownership Act, the Promotion Law fur Adequate Mansion Management of Japan, the Housing Law, Housing Execution Law and Rule of Korea. Second, the Association of Apartment Owners, an organization of owners of apartments in Japan and the Commission of the Representatives of the Occupants in Korea become the subject of maintenance. The Japan structure is made of the Assembly, the Director and the President. The Korean structure is made of Regular and Temporary Conferences and elected Officers(1 president, at least 2 directors and at least 1 inspector). The Commission of the Representatives of the Occupants and the Organization of Owners of Apartments make bylaws and diverse maintenance rules. Third, the foremost reason why the Korean structure of maintenance of apartments is less efficient than Japan is because of the small number of people dispatched to the living-environment maintenance team and their short terms. It is necessary to grow professionals related to this sector and to have enough public servants that specialize in this. Fourth, although it is compulsory to make long term plans for maintenance based on the Housing Law, because the reserve fund is decided by the maintenance rule(with no compulsory standards of reservation) of each apartment, it is difficult to reserve an adequate amount of reserve fund. So as in the example of the state of Hawaii in America, based on long term plans for maintenance, an execution rule of the Housing Law should be made which enforces to reserve at least 50 percent of future maintenance expenses.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.25-34
• /
• 2014

The major purposes of this study were to analyze main features of US Green Building Council's LEED for Homes rating system and examine residents' satisfaction on their LEED-certified homes and neighborhoods. The first part of this article shows the structure and features of the LEED for Homes rating system and the process to obtain credits of this rating system. The investigation to assess residents' satisfaction targeted LEED certified home residents in Midwest in the United State. The satisfaction was assessed in relation to socio-demographic and housing characteristics. To collect data, a quantitative survey was administered to the residents of LEED-certified homes in Midwest in the US. A total of 605 surveys was sent out and 235 were collected, yielding a 38.8% response rate. Findings revealed that LEED-certified home residents were highly satisfied with their homes and neighborhood although neighborhood satisfaction was lower than housing satisfaction. Residents' income and education were the significant socio-demographic factors that show significant relationships with housing satisfaction. Residents' home ownership, length of residence, housing types were significant housing characteristics on their satisfaction while the levels of LEED certifications (i.e., certified, silver, gold, and platinum) were not significantly related to housing satisfaction. The findings of this study suggest the importance of developing effective strategies for those who are less educated, lower income classes, renters, or multi-attached housing residents for more successful development of LEED-certified homes in the future.

• 한국경제지리학회지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.17-44
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 LA지역 한인 이주민을 대상으로 정착경로 및 주거입지 특성을 살펴보고, 이주민의 주택 소유구조와 주거 입지요인 선호에 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 분석결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째로, 이주민들의 정착경로를 보면, 초기 정착지는 한인타운이지만 이후 백인 주류층 거주지로 주거지를 이동하는 공간적 동화 유형과, 이주 초기부터 백인 주류층 거주지에 정착하는 유형이 대표적이다. 둘째로, 이주민의 현재 주거입지 결정요인에 대한 이항로짓분석 결과를 보면, 저소득층, 이주당시 연령이 높은 집단, 이주기간이 10년 이하인 집단, 주택을 소유하지 않은 집단에서는 한인타운을 거주지로 선택한 반면, 고자산층, 이주당시 연령이 낮은 집단, 주택을 소유한 집단, 미혼, 고학력자, 이주기간이 10년 이상인 집단에서는 백인주류층을 거주지로 선택한 것으로 확인된다. 셋째로, 이주민의 주택 소유구조 특성을 보면, 이주민들은 이주기간이 10년을 지나고, 소득수준이 6만 달러를 넘게 되면서 백인 주류층 거주지역의 단독주택을 보유하는 경향을 보인다. 넷째로, 주거 입지요인의 중요도에 대한 분산분석 결과를 보면, 고소득층 및 자가주택 거주자 집단은 경제성, 자연환경, 주택 내부시설의 우수성, 백인 주류층 네트워크와 같은 입지요인을 더 선호하는 것으로 나타난다. 이러한 연구결과를 통해 볼 때, 향후 경제적으로 성공한 이주민들과 그렇지 못한 이주민들 간에 주거지 양극화가 더 커질 것으로 보이며, 한인타운의 역할과 입지에도 변화가 예상된다.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제25권6호
• /
• pp.133-146
• /
• 2014

This study aims to analyze the changes of adjacent residential area after the restoration of covered urban streams in seoul. The changes of adjacent residential area after restoration were analyzed by changes of land using, urban structure, individual lot of land and architecture to investigate relationship of the urban stream and residential change. The result as follows: the first one is the change of land use and urban structure in adjacent residential area. This change of infrastructure through stream restoration has transformed land use and urban structure in adjacent residential area. Secondly, there is the changes of the individual lot of land. It seemed that new development by combined lots would be concentrated in stream-side blocks. But, the changes of lots such as combining or dividing lots tend to be concentrated in stream-side, main road and main streets. In stream-side, commercial function of land use has changed to residential one which has restored streams landscape by transformation of lots use without changes of ownership-lots. Finally, there is the change of architecture. It turned out new building in adjacent residential area is similar to general development. However, new building in streamside is related to direction of stream. In addition, remodeling and expansion tend to change in commercial buildings on stream-side bridges of corner lots intensively. As a result, it is related to expectation of architectural activation and improvement of sidewalk environment by stream restoration.

• 대한지리학회지
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.35-56
• /
• 1995

본 논문은 지속적인 서울시의 성장이 그 주변지역의 성장을 수반하면서 서울대도시 권화되어가는 과정을 밝히고 서울대도시권역을 설정한 후, 서울대도시권역 내에서 기능적 특성에 따라 지역을 분류하려는 것이 그 목적이었다. 1990년 시점에서의 서울대도시권역의 경계가 어느 정도 확대되었는가를 측정하기 위하여 도시화 정도를 측정하는 지표와 서울과 의 기능적 연계성을 측정하는 지표를 토대로 하여 그 권역을 설정하였다. 그 결과 서울대도 시권역은 수도권의 거의 전 지역을 포함하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 서울대도시권역에 포함된 지역들은 서울이 갖고 있는 기능을 일부 분담하면서 기능적인 면에서 특화되거나 전 문화되어 기능적 특성에 따라서 신종주거기능 탁월지역, 제조업기능 탁월지역, 서비스기능 탁월지역, 잠재적 개발가능지역의 4개 그룹으로 지역을 분류할 수 있었다.