• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.28-35
• /
• 2008

Purpose: This study was conducted to examine the clinical significance IV-contrasted helical abdomen computed tomography (CT) as a diagnostic screening tool to evaluate hollow viscus injury in blunt abdominal trauma patients. Methods: This is a retrospective study encompassing 108 patients, presenting to Korea University Medical Center (KUMC) Emergency Department (ED) from January 2007 to December 2007, with an initial CT finding suggestive of intra-abdominal injury. An initial non-enhanced abdomen CT was taken, followed by an enhanced CT with intravenous contrast. Patients' demographic data, as well as the mechanisms of injury, were inquired upon and obtained, initial diagnosis, as dictated by specialized radiologists, were added to post-operational (post-OP) findings and to additional CT findings acquired during their hospital stays, and all were combined to arrive at final diagnosis. Initial CT findings were further compared with the final diagnosis, yielding values for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, as well as positive and negative predictive values. Patients were further divided into two groups, namely, those that underwent operational intervention and those that did not. The initial CT findings of each group were subsequently compared and analyzed. Results: Initial CT scans revealed abnormal findings in a total of 212 cases - solid organ injuries being the most common finding, as was observed in 97 cases. Free fluid accumulation was evident in another 69 cases. Based on the CT findings, 77 cases (71.3%) were initially diagnosed as having a solid organ injury, 20 cases (18.5%) as having a combined (solid organ + hollow viscus) injury, and 11 cases (10.2%), as having an isolated hollow viscus injury. The final diagnosis however, were somewhat different, with only 67 cases (62.0%) attributed to solid organ injury, 31 cases (28.7%) to combined injury (solid + hollow), and 10 cases (9.3%) to hollow viscus injury. The sensitivity (CI 95%) of the initial helical CT in diagnosing hollow viscus injury was 75.6%, and its specificity was 100%. The accuracy in diagnosing hollow viscus injury was also meaningfully lower compared to that in diagnosis of solid organ injury. Among patients initially diagnosed with solid organ injuries, 10 patients (2 from follow-up CT and 8 from post-OP finding) turned out to have combined injuries. A total of 38 patients underwent an operation, and the proportion of initial CT findings suggesting free air, mesenteric hematoma or bowel wall thickening turned out to be significantly higher in the operation group. Conclusion: Abdominal CT was a meaningful screening test for hollow viscus injury, but the sensitivity of abdominal CT was significantly lower in detecting hollow viscus injury as compared to solid organ injury. This calls for special consideration and careful observation by the ED physicians when dealing with cases of blunt abdominal trauma.

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제37권2호
• /
• pp.140-146
• /
• 2024

Purpose: Despite the high incidence of abdominal stab injuries, the rate of nontherapeutic laparotomies and the predictors of therapeutic laparotomies have rarely been studied in low-income settings. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study involved three of the largest academic medical centers in central Ethiopia. All patients who sustained an anterior abdominal stab injury and underwent exploratory laparotomy, regardless of the intraoperative findings, were included over the 3-year course of the study. Results: Of the 117 patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy, 35 patients (29.9%) underwent nontherapeutic laparotomies. Three factors predicted therapeutic laparotomy: hollow viscus evisceration (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 5.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-28.64; P=0.032), localized and generalized peritonitis (AOR, 4.77; 95% CI, 1.90-11.93; P=0.001), and white blood cell count ≥11,500/mm³ (AOR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.002-7.650; P=0.049). The overall positive predictive value of the therapeutic predictors was 80.2%, while the negative predictive value of all predictor-negative patients was 58.1%. The predictors would have prevented 51.4% of the nontherapeutic laparotomies. Conclusions: Close to one-third of the patients had a nontherapeutic laparotomy. The clinical predictors of therapeutic laparotomy were shown to have a high positive predictive value despite a lower negative predictive value. Further prospective studies that involve all patients who sustain anterior abdominal stab injuries are needed to potentially improve on the negative predictive value of the predictors suggested by our study.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.235-239
• /
• 2019

고도의 외상성 간손상은 높은 이환율과 사망율을 동반한다. 저자들은 혈역학적으로 불안정한 외상성 간손상 환자를 인터벤션 영상의학 전문의의 즉각적인 개입으로 빠른 혈관조영술을 시행함으로써 효과적으로 치료한 증례를 보고하고자 한다. 29세 남자가 낙하산 훈련 중 추락하여 본원 응급실을 통해 내원하였다. 초기 환자 혈압은 80/40 mmHg였고 응급 초음파 검사에서 간 열상과 주변에 혈액으로 보이는 체액이 관찰되었다. 내원 16분 후 수액 소생술을 시행에도 불구하고 혈압이 60/42 mmHg로 감소하여 전산화단층촬영을 생략하고 바로 혈관조영술을 시행하였다 (병원 도착 후 동맥 천자까지의 시간: 36분). 혈관조영술에서 우후간동맥 (right posterior hepatic artery) 출혈이 관찰되어 색전술을 시행하였다. 혈관색전술 후 환자의 혈압은 120/77 mmHg로 상승하였고, 생체징후가 안정된 후 전산화단층촬영을 시행하여 추가적인 출혈이나 내강장기의 손상이 없음을 확인하였다. 환자는 중환자실로 입원하여 보존적 치료를 시행하였으며, 내원 후 30일째 특별한 합병증 없이 퇴원하였다. 본 증례에서 혈역학적으로 불안정한 고도의 간손상 환자에서 전산화단층촬영을 생략하고 매우 빠르게 혈관조영술 및 색전술을 시행하여 안전하고 효과적으로 치료할 수 있었다.