• 대한건축학회논문집:계획계
• /
• 제35권1호
• /
• pp.93-98
• /
• 2019

Recently, the rise in the housing burden on young couples has led to a serious housing poverty among young people. The number of young people who move into public rental housing is very small because the eligibility for public rental housing is determined based on income, the status of housing subscription, and the size of the household. With this background, the government launched a public rental housing program called Happy Housing Project, which gives young people the priority to move in first. However, the program is facing an obstacle due to the opposition of local residents. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether public rental housing can induce the NIMBY syndrome through conducting a literature review, followed by an analysis of NIMBY syndrome around the currently supplied Happy House development areas, and finally analyzing the household characteristics in order to identify which households were prone to the NIMBY syndrome. To confirm the existence of the NIMBY syndrome, this paper comparatively analyzed the two groups using binary logit analysis. The first group consists of households that are against the Happy House policy, and the second group consists of households that are aware of the Happy House development taking place in their neighborhoods, and are against the development. This study considered the households against the Happy House development in their neighborhoods to have NIMBY tendencies, and focused on comparing the households with NIMBY tendencies with those who do not. To confirm whether the residents around the Happy House neighborhoods have NIMBY tendencies, this paper compared the two groups and confirmed that about 4% of the households have NIMBY tendencies. This paper subsequently analyzed the households with NIMBY tendencies, and found them to have a higher number of children, reside in apartments and reside in owned homes. The volume of the 2018 Happy Housing (35,000 households) is three times higher than that of 2017. The present study aims to analyze the tendency of residents who oppose the construction of Happy Housing so as to derive policy implications for the smooth provision of public rental housing.

• 한국주거학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국주거학회 2011년도 춘계학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.161-166
• /
• 2011

This research was conducted in order to suggestion management program of Happy house center which facility of detached housings, multi family housing, and semi-detached housing management. This study's purpose is to systematically help create a district customized co-management housing management system among detached housing area by reflecting resident opinion and simultaneously provide basic research. The area of research is Sanjoen district in Ulsan city that compact old detached houses. The research study's results are follows: First, the overall survey results showed that most respondents demanded program of happy house center for housing energy deduction method and support of house insulation cost and heating fuel cost. Second, happy house center try to order of priority or housing maintenance and seek of cost deduction plan. Third, happy house center propose the Maeulmandeulgi(Machizkuri) program or housing management plan for residents' talent contribution.

• 토지주택연구
• /
• 제5권4호
• /
• pp.247-257
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 최근 임대 및 소규모 위주의 공공주택정책과 개발 패러다임의 변화를 반영하여 소규모 주택사업지구와 행복주택사업지구를 중심으로 하는 새로운 주택수요평가모델을 제시하였다. 공공주택 사업지구의 수요평가모델은 정량적 평가요소인 잠재소요지표, 수요압력지표와 정성적 평가요소인 지역여건지표로 구성된다. 소규모 주택사업지구의 잠재소요지표는 읍 면 동 단위의 해당 지역에서 도출된 잠재소요량에서 기 공급된 건설임대와 매입 임대 재고물량을 차감하여 산출하였다. 이렇게 산출된 실제소요물량과 신규공급계획물량을 비교하여 공급의 미달, 적정, 초과를 판단하였다. 도심 내 젊은 층을 위한 행복주택사업지구의 경우 잠재소요지표는 시 군 구 단위의 해당 지역에서 행복주택공급대상계층인 대학생, 사회초년생, 신혼부부를 대상으로 임차여부, 소득요건 등을 바탕으로 추정하였다. 중소도시 및 농어촌지역 소규모 주택사업지구의 경우 수요압력지표는 해당 지역의 청약저축가입자수, 기초생활보장수급자수, 국가보훈대상자수와 각각의 무주택가구수 대비 비중으로 산출하였다. 다만 지역여건지표와 산업단지 개발 등 향후 인구유발요인 등을 감안하여 후보지 선정여부를 종합적으로 판단하도록 하였다. 행복주택사업지구의 수요압력지표는 해당지역의 소형주택재고비율, 전세가격상승률, 전세가격수준, 월세거주가구비율로 하였고 이를 전국 및 해당 시 도 평균과 비교하여 수요압력 정도를 판단하였다. 또한 행복주택의 사업여건이나 입지경쟁력과 관련된 대중교통이용여건, 주변시설현황, 중심지와의 거리, 지역개발현황 등의 지역여건지표를 바탕으로 최종적인 평가가 이루어지도록 하였다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.211-223
• /
• 2022

본 연구는 주거정책 분야에서 여론을 수렴하기 위해 블로그의 활용 가능성을 고찰하고자 한다. 이를 위해 '행복주택'을 키워드로 관련 게시글을 수집하고 주요 키워드를 추출하여 키워드 분석과 단어 군집 분석을 통해 대중들의 인식을 파악하였다. 행복주택에 대한 사회적 논의가 확산된 2013년 5월부터 2021년 8월까지 블로그 게시글 137,002개를 분석 자료로 활용하였으며, 주요 정책과 자료 수집량을 고려하여 수집 기간을 3단계로 나누어 도출된 단어를 분석한 결과는 다음과 같다. 키워드 분석에서 전반적으로 행복주택의 위치, 세대수, 단지 및 주택 규모, 입주 가능 조건 등과 관련된 단어의 중요도가 높았다. 1단계에서는 정부 정책 시행, 2단계에서는 행복주택 신청 절차, 3단계에서는 모집공고, 입주 자격, 임대조건에 중요도가 각각 높은 것으로 나타났다. 군집 분석에서는 모든 단계에서 사업 진행, 신청 절차, 사업지역이 주요 주제로 도출되었다. 특히, 1단계에서는 정책 시행 및 추진방안, 2단계는 입주 자격 및 금융 지원, 3단계에서는 정책 시행 및 입주 자격이 주요한 주제로 도출되었다. 이러한 결과는 블로그를 통해 정책 관련 정보 공유 및 사회적 이슈 반영, 정책 전달 여부 평가, 대중의 정책 참여도 유추가 가능하며, 블로그를 여론 수렴 방법으로 활용할 가능성을 제시한 데에 의의가 있다.

• 토지주택연구
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.145-152
• /
• 2013

This paper addresses the relationship between public housing tenure and social disadvantage. The research examines social capital levels among public tenants in Australia, concentrating on their level of interpersonal trust and confidence in a range of public institutions. Through multivariate analyses of national survey data it also profiles the social and political background of public housing tenants. Although public housing tenants have access to secure and affordable housing, they appear to be less trusting and 'happy' than private renters or homeowners, and exhibit less confidence in some institutions such as the Australian parliament, universities and the ABC (the Australian public television broadcaster). These results probably reflect the residualised nature of public housing in Australia and indicate that public tenants are likely to be 'alienated' from certain aspects of mainstream culture. However, public tenants have higher levels of confidence than homeowners in the Australian defence forces and trade unions. So public housing may 'shore up' confidence and social capital in some areas, and levels of trust would be lower if public housing was not available to disadvantaged citizens.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제21권5호
• /
• pp.35-42
• /
• 2010

This study examines and analyzes plan of Hanok which has been newly built at rural areas in Jeollanam-do province and is to present the direction in setting architectural plan of Hanok at rural areas. For the purpose of this study, analyzed the types of Hanok based on the topological characteristics of main house and main spaces including room, living room and kitchen. Five types of 105 Hanoks, type-I, type-II, type-III, type-IV and type-V were drawn on the based of the shape of main house and topological characteristics of main rooms including room, living room and kitchen. Type-I had spatial composition of main rooms in a row and showed similar shape of main house with traditional private houses in Honam region, type-II showed placement of living room in center and main rooms beside it, type-III showed change of type-II and placed kitchen and annex behind living room and similar plan composition with type-III and secured the area of living room and rooms by enlarging the number of rooms, and type-V had the shape of main house with twisted form and placed living room in the center and each room at side or twisted part to ensure openness of living room.

• 토지주택연구
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.39-55
• /
• 2024

본 연구의 목적은 통합공공임대주택 본격 공급 시기에 맞추어 유형통합 대상인 영구임대, 국민임대, 행복주택 유형별 거주자의 주거만족도와 영향요인에 대한 분석을 실시하여 공공임대주택 단지계획 시 입주자의 주거만족도 제고를 위해 우선 고려해야 하는 요소를 도출하고 정책적 시사점을 찾고자 하는 것이다. 연구의 범위는 공공임대주택 유형별 거주자의 주거만족도 차이를 분석하고 주거만족도 영향요인을 규명하고 비교하는 것이다. 분석대상 자료는 2021년도 국토교통부 '주거실태조사' 마이크로 데이터이며 분석방법으로는 일원배치 분산분석과 이항 로지스틱 회귀분석을 활용하였다. 실증분석 결과 영구임대주택 거주자와 국민임대주택 거주자의 주거만족도 수준에 차이가 있었으며 국민임대 거주자의 주거만족도가 더 높았다. 임대유형별 주거만족도 영향요인으로 전반적 주택상태만족도의 경우 영구임대와 국민임대 거주자는 주택상태, 주택소음, 시설접근성 요인, 행복주택 거주자의 경우 주택소음과 주거환경요인으로 나타나 상이하였다. 전반적 주거환경만족도의 영향요인은 영구임대 거주자의 경우 주택상태, 시설접근성 및 주거환경 요인이었으며 국민임대 거주자는 주택소음, 시설접근성, 주거환경 요인, 행복주택 거주자는 주택상태, 주택소음, 시설접근성 요인으로 나타나 상이하였다. 세 가지 유형 모두 공통적으로 주택소음 요인을 주택상태만족도의 영향요인으로, 시설접근성 요인을 주거환경만족도의 영향요인으로 인식하고 있어 단지계획 시 우선 반영해야 하는 요인으로 밝혀졌다. 후속 연구를 통해 영향요인의 변화 추세에 대한 시계열 분석이 필요하다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제16권9호
• /
• pp.170-184
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 우리나라 공공임대주택정책은 '왜' 역대 정부에 따라서 경로변화를 할 수밖에 없었는가를 신제도주의 한 분파인 역사적 제도주의의 비교 역사적 분석방법과, 역사적 제도주의의 한계점을 보완하기 위하여 등장한 핵커(Hacker, 2004: 248)의 경로 진화모형을 혼합하여 분석하고자 한다. 우리나라는 고도의 산업화와 도시화로 인하여 이농현상이 초래되었으며 여기에 따른 부작용으로 주택문제가 심각한 사회문제로 대두되었다. 이러한 주택문제를 해결하기 위하여 역대 정부는 어떠한 정책을 시행하였는가를 살펴보고자 한다. 5,16군사정변으로 인한 제3공화국의 등장, 대한주택공사 설립, 정권의 정통성 부재에 대한 여론 호도용 이라는 우연성과 결정적 시기를 계기로 공공임대주택정책의 경로가 시작되었다고 보고 본 연구에서는 심층적인 연구를 하기 위해 경로진화 과정 중 이명박 정부의 '보금자리주택',과 박근혜정부의 '행복주택',을 비교 분석함으로써 공공임대주택정책의 현주소를 진단하고, 향후 공공임대주택정책의 바람직한 방향을 제시하는데 연구의 목적이 있다.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.47-55
• /
• 1993

The research was carried out by posing a questionnaire, making middle and high schoolstudents 549 in Taehu an object of this research, in order to grasp the residential outlook of juveniles.1. The first order of reason why they have resided in present their houses was by a school group and their parents' choice and work place and second order of reason was by their parents' choice, life convenience in present house add traffice convenience And there was littledifference in the first and second residential reasons according to sew.2. In compareson with past and present house type, past and present house type shewed same tendency and future wanted house type was separate house absolutely.3. Points to be considered in selectong future were in the order of facilities, traffice,, surrounding, educational, social and economical circumstances. There was little difference in almost items to be considered in choosing accordant to sew. But in case of schoolgirls, they consisered more items in selecting houses than in schoolboys.4. As a result of researching ideal house of juvenile, happy family was most Preferred and the desire to possess house was expressed strongly.5. The first value on house was health of family, the stability, the stabi]ity and the residential convenience. And schoolboys attacged more importance to the gealth of family, ghe stability and the education fer children than in case of school-girls but on the other hand school girls attached more importance to economical value house and happy and harmonious family.

• 산경연구논집
• /
• 제11권11호
• /
• pp.29-38
• /
• 2020

Purpose: The problem of housing poverty among young people is a very important problem for the nation. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to identify the problems of the government's housing support policy for young people. And it is in presenting specific solutions by fully reflecting the opinions of experts. Research design, data and methodology: This study consisted of analyzing the following three research topics: 1) the differences of youth residential support housing policy impact on young adults' housing stability, 2) the problems and solutions of youth housing support policy, and 3) the differences of experts' opinions on the impact of government policy on youth housing stability. The subject of this study is the government's seven housing policies for young people. The targets include Happy Public Rental Housing (Happiness Housing), Station Area Rental Housing for youth (Station Area 2030), Public Dormitory for College Students (Public Dormitory & Hope Dormitory), Jeonse Rental Housing for College Students (Subject Lease Rental Housing for College Students), Social Housing for Young People, and Share House. The data was organized through expert surveys from 1st to 30th June 2020. The experts surveyed include professors & researchers, public officer & public institutions staff, and private developers of young adults' housing. The methodology of analysis on the problem and the solution of government policy was Frequency analysis. And analysis methods on differences of experts' opinion were ANOVA, Levene' test, and Schefe test. Results: Problems in Government's youth residential support housing policy include high rents, lack of supply, difficulty in acquiring rental housing, inconvenience in using shared spaces, conflicts with cohabitants, and invasion of privacy. Solutions include expanding supply to urban areas, establishing long-term plans, securing privacy, diversifying business methods, establishing platforms for rental housing transactions, and expanding various public support (financial support, etc). Conclusions: There was a difference in perception among groups of experts on the impact of public rental housing (called 'happiness housing') in youth housing stability. It is very urgent to come up with the most reasonable policy to support youth housing. This requires in-depth discussions by experts to narrow their differences.